Debt Collector

Lawyer Ken Bailey: Honey, Here’s Our $3.3M Home for Ten Bucks. That’ll Keep the Zombie Warrior Away

As debt collectin’ lawyer Bob Kruckemeyer seeks to garnish lawyer F. Ken Bailey for millions, Bailey passes title of main residence to spouse.

LAWSUIT 1 OF 3: PERSONAL DEBT COLLECTION BY KRUCKEMEYER

202126089 –

MELBER, KENNETH vs. BAILEY, F KENNETH JR

 (Court 281, JUDGE CHRISTINE WEEMS)

APR 30, 2021 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: MAY 9, 2023
Jul 5, OCT 15, 2024

CASE DISPOSED: DEFAULT JUDGMENT SIGNED

Last visited and/or updated by LIT.

Default judgment signed by Judge Weems (datestamped August 8, 2023), awarding Kruckemeyer his attorney  fees ($5k) and client his judgment of appx $1.4 million, without the need for any loan paperwork or agreements. See; Flores v. Hun Chang, No. 01-20-00421-CV, at *12 (Tex. App. June 30, 2022) (“ Although pleadings are not evidence, no evidence is necessary to support a default judgment because the defendant’s failure to answer is taken as admitting the allegations of the petition. Huynh v. Vo, No. 01-02-00295-CV, 2003 WL 1848607, at *1 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] Apr. 10, 2003, no pet.) (mem. op.).”)

Case (Cause) Number Style File Date Court Case Region Type Of Action / Offense
201374628- 7
Disposed (Final)
TEXAS CAPITAL BANK NA vs. BAILEY JR, KENNETH F 12/12/2013 190 Civil OTHER CIVIL
197942071- 7
Purged
KAYE, DONALD B  vs.
FLOUR ENGINEERS & CONSTRUCTORS
9/25/1979 234 Civil DAMAGES (OTHER)

LAWSUIT 2 OF 3: PERSONAL DEBT COLLECTION BY KRUCKEMEYER

202126090 –

KRM INVESTMENTS INC vs. BAILEY, F KENNETH

(Court 127, JUDGE RAVI K. SANDILL)

APR 30, 2021 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: MAY 9, 2023
Jul 5, OCT 15, 2024

Last visited and/or updated by LIT.

Writ returned. No assets. Retired lawyer. Fixed income. Dementia. No non-exempt assets.

Plaintiff’s Cert Written Discovery

Request for Writ of Execution

DEFENDANT COSTS

FINAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT SIGNED

MONETARY DAMAGES AWARDED

ORDER SIGNED AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES

Kruckemeyer’s known Ken Melber since 2010. Kruckemeyer submits time sheets at $450 and $475 per hr but affidavit says his charge out rate  is $500. He also wants $25k for any appeal or supreme court petition. LIT has seen this in state court filings and in LIT’s opinion, judgments of this nature – including fees before any proceeding commences – is unconstitutional, period.

LAWSUIT 3 OF 3: PERSONAL DEBT COLLECTION BY KRUCKEMEYER

202126091 –

JVH INTERESTS INC vs. BAILEY, F KENNETH (JR)

 (Court 269, JUDGE CORY SEPOLIO)

APR 30, 2021 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: MAY 9, 2023
Jul 5, OCT 15, 2024

Last visited and/or updated by LIT.

Writ returned. No assets. Retired lawyer. Fixed income. Dementia. No non-exempt assets.

DEFAULT JUDGMENT SIGNED  

05/10/2023
MONETARY DAMAGES AWARDED  

05/10/2023
ORDER SIGNED AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES

Kruckemeyer’s boilerplate default judgment request, awarding Kruckemeyer his attorney fees and client his judgment.

Kruckemeyer’s known Ken Melber since 2010. Kruckemeyer submits time sheets at $450 and $475 per hr but affidavit says his charge out rate  is $500. He also wants $25k for any appeal or supreme court petition. LIT has seen this in state court filings and in LIT’s opinion, judgments of this nature – including fees before any proceeding commences – is unconstitutional, period.

THE $85 MILLION DOLLAR DEBT COLLECTION CASE

 202351403 –

VIRAGE SPV 1 LLC vs. F KENNETH BAILEY JR P C

(Court 152)

AUG 9, 2023 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: NOV 15, 2023
 OCT 15, 2024

SAVE THE DATE: OCT 18, 2024 PARTIAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Last visited and/or updated by LIT.

Response in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment:

LIT: How can you represent someone with dementia, Johnie Patterson?

Comes now Plaintiff Virage SPV I LLC (“Virage”), and regarding its motion to compel, filed on February 13, 2024, states as follows:

1.      The Court heard Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel on March 8, 2024.

At the time, the Court granted Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel and issued the Order, attached as Exhibit 1, compelling production of documents.

2.      Since the time of the Order, counsel for Plaintiff and Defendants have conferred in good faith.

Counsel for Defendants has provided some updates as to the availability of certain information, but no new documents have been produced or discovery responses have been propounded since the date of the Order.

3.      Given the two months between the date of the Order and the renewed hearing date, Plaintiff is requesting that Defendants either

(1) produce any further responsive documents and provide any updated within two weeks of the date of the hearing; or

(2) confirm no further responsive documents and no further discovery responses will be provided.

4.      Such an order will allow this case to move forward expeditiously and avoid further discovery disputes regarding the information responsive to Plaintiff’s discovery requests that were subject to the Motion.

Dated: June 4, 2024                                        Respectfully Submitted,

AHMAD, ZAVITSANOS & MENSING, PLLC

ORD SGN GRNTNG PROTECTION FROM DISCOVERY REQUEST (ATTORNEY EYES ONLY PROTECTIVE ORDER)

SDTX FEDERAL BANKRUPTCY CASE FOR THE RANCH

Bailey Four Canyon Ranch Properties, Ltd.

(18-34527)

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas

AUG 13, 2018 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: APR 27, 2022

Notice of Abandonment (Dec. 27, 2021)

In the context of a bankruptcy case, a notice of abandonment of real property is a legal document filed by a bankruptcy trustee or debtor in possession that relinquishes their interest in a piece of real property that is part of the bankruptcy estate.

Abandonment means that the trustee or debtor in possession is giving up any right or claim to the property, and it is no longer considered part of the bankruptcy estate. This notice is usually filed when the trustee determines that the value of the property is not worth the cost of administering and selling it for the benefit of creditors.

Once the notice of abandonment is filed, the debtor or any other interested party may take possession of the property and may use or dispose of it as they wish. It is important to note that the abandonment of real property does not relieve the debtor of any existing liens or encumbrances on the property.

Overall, a notice of abandonment of real property in a federal bankruptcy case means that the trustee or debtor in possession is relinquishing their interest in the property and it is no longer considered part of the bankruptcy estate.

CONVERTED, CLOSED, PlnDue, DsclsDue, DUPFILER

 

U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Southern District of Texas (Houston)
Bankruptcy Petition #: 18-34527

Assigned to: David R Jones
Chapter 7
Previous chapter 11
Original chapter 11
Voluntary
Asset

 

Debtor disposition:  Discharge Not Applicable

Date filed:   08/06/2018
Date converted:   06/07/2021
Date of Intradistrict transfer:   08/09/2018
Date terminated:   04/25/2022
341 meeting:   08/10/2021
Deadline for filing claims:   10/12/2021
Deadline for filing claims (govt.):   02/19/2019

 

Debtor
Bailey Four Canyon Ranch Properties, Ltd.
5555 San Felipe
Suite 900
Houston, TX 77056
HARRIS-TX
Tax ID / EIN: 76-0582686
represented by Richard L Fuqua, II
Fuqua & Associates, PC
8558 Katy Freeway
Suite 119
Houston, TX 77024
713-960-0277
Email: fuqua@fuqualegal.com
Trustee
Christopher R Murray
Jones Murray LLP
602 Sawyer St
Ste 400
Houston, TX 77007
832-529-1999
U.S. Trustee
US Trustee
Office of the US Trustee
515 Rusk Ave
Ste 3516
Houston, TX 77002
713-718-4650
represented by Hector Duran, Jr
U.S. Trustee
515 Rusk
Ste 3516
Houston, Tx 77002
7137184650
Email: Hector.Duran.Jr@usdoj.gov

 

Filing Date # Docket Text
12/26/2021 111
(1 pg)
Notice of Abandonment of Real Property in Tyler County Filed by Christopher R Murray (Murray, Christopher) (Entered: 12/26/2021)
02/07/2022 112
(1 pg)
Order Approving Trustee’s Compensation and Expenses (Related Doc 107). Signed on 2/7/2022. (VrianaPortillo) (Entered: 02/07/2022)
02/09/2022 113
(3 pgs)
BNC Certificate of Mailing. (Related document(s):112 Order on Trustee’s Application for Compensation and Expenses) No. of Notices: 5. Notice Date 02/09/2022. (Admin.) (Entered: 02/09/2022)
03/22/2022 114 The United States Trustee has reviewed the Chapter 7 Trustee’s Final Account and Distribution Report Certification that the Estate has been Fully Administered and Application to be Discharged. The United States Trustee does not object to the relief requested. (United States Trustee SDTXts, Trish) (Entered: 03/22/2022)
03/22/2022 115
(7 pgs)
Chapter 7 Trustee’s Final Account and Distribution Report Certification that the Estate has been Fully Administered and Application to be Discharged (United States Trustee SDTXts, Trish) (Entered: 03/22/2022)
04/25/2022 116
(1 pg)
Final Decree Signed on 4/25/2022 (hcar) (Entered: 04/25/2022)
04/27/2022 117
(3 pgs)
BNC Certificate of Mailing. (Related document(s):116 Final Decree) No. of Notices: 1. Notice Date 04/27/2022. (Admin.) (Entered: 04/27/2022)

 


 

PACER Service Center
Transaction Receipt
05/09/2023 21:47:40

TEXAS SUPREME COURT: 23-0859

FLOYD KENNETH BAILEY, JR. AND KENNETH CAMP BAILEY
v.
ADAM PEAVY AND ADAM PEAVY PC

OCT 13, 2023 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: NOV 14, 2023

Houston Lawyer Sues Former Partners, Alleging They ‘Cheated Him Out of Millions’

JAN 29, 2019 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: MAY 9, 2023

Houston plaintiffs lawyer Adam Peavy is at odds with his former partners, Ken Bailey and Camp Bailey, alleging in a newly filed lawsuit that he was promised millions in fees that his former firm never paid.

“Peavy was involved in cases that generated hundreds of millions in fees for the firm, but the Baileys have cheated him out of the compensation he was owed—like so many other lawyers the Baileys have stiffed or cheated the past few years,” Peavy alleges in a petition he filed on Monday in state district court in Houston.

Peavy, now a solo practitioner in Houston, alleges that the Baileys shortchanged him for his tort litigation work, including his work on a case involving the antidepressant Paxil.

Camp Bailey is a founding partner of Bailey Cowan Heckaman, and his father, Ken Bailey, a former partner in the firm, is now of counsel. When asked to respond to the allegations in the suit, Camp Bailey said the suit is “wrong, unfortunate and misguided” and they will defend it vigorously.

Alan Daughtry, a solo practitioner in Houston who represents Peavy, said Peavy is owed, easily, $5 million in fees or more.

Peavy alleges in Peavy v. Bailey that he entered into an agreement in 2008 with the firm, then called Bailey Perrin & Bailey, to work on Paxil litigation for 5 percent of gross recovery of the litigation, whether by settlement or judgment. Peavy alleges that he “took over complete control” of the firm’s Paxil docket, and did the bulk of the work on the litigation for a joint venture Bailey Perrin had entered into with another firm.

“Meanwhile, the Baileys did nothing,” Peavy alleges in the petition. “They never attended a hearing, deposition, client meeting, trial or settlement meeting.”

Peavy was involved in the first Paxil trial in September 2009, his petition said, and the plaintiff’s team won a multimillion-dollar verdict.

After the first group of Paxil suits settled, Peavy alleged, he was responsible for organizing the suits for settlement and payment, and “the Baileys did nothing.” Then, he said, in a “glimpse of things to come,” the Baileys failed to compensate him on $12 million of the fee income, which he didn’t learn about until 2018.

“At the time of the settlement, Peavy had no clue that the Baileys misstated the amount of recovery, and they never provided any accounting to substantiate the compensation he received,” Peavy alleged in the petition. “Peavy has been shorted (and damaged) by the Baileys for approximately $1 million from this misdeed alone.”

In 2011, Peavy alleged, the Baileys made him a nonequity partner in the firm, and agreed to pay him a 7 percent “profit” from the Paxil litigation and other cases. In 2013, the Baileys made him a name partner in Bailey Peavy Bailey, giving him a 10 percent interest in the firm for all litigation.

But, Peavy alleged, “during this whole period of time,” the Baileys were not sharing fees with him. Instead, they promised to “make it up to him” on future settlements, he said.

“Unfortunately, the Baileys did not live up to their rosy promises and representations of income. Instead, the Baileys gave Peavy his same old draw,” Peavy’s petition said.

Just months after he was made a name partner in the firm, the Baileys took out a loan in March 2014, borrowing against Paxil fees, Peavy alleged. “Apparently, the Baileys pocketed a loan of $17 million for themselves,” the petition said, adding that the loan was taken out in the firm’s name without informing him.

Peavy also alleged that the firm failed to pay him after getting $40 million in fees from a vaginal mesh litigation.

The Baileys agreed to give Peavy 20 percent equity in a newly created firm, Bailey Peavy Bailey Cowan Heckaman, in 2015.

In 2016, Peavy was involved in two trials that led to a global settlement in Paxil litigation, his petition said, and to get payments he had to secure approval from “hundreds of clients.” Despite that work, Peavy alleged, Camp Bailey took 20 percent off the top of the Paxil income for “referral fees.”

Later, the Baileys claimed that the $46 million in fees and expenses the firm was paid in 2018 for Paxil litigation was “all gone” and the litigation was not profitable, the petition said.

In his petition, Peavy alleged the Baileys failed to pay him what he is due, even though they claimed they would. His causes of action include breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, fraudulent transfer, and conspiracy, and he seeks more than $1 million in actual and exemplary damages.

“They refused every last chance to do right by him. They short-changed him on fees by millions of dollars, stopped his draw, and canceled his medical benefits,” the petition said.

Sealed and Submitted, Apr. 6, 2023 for Opinion

Ken Bailey Wins Texas Lawyer’s 2016 Professional Excellence Award

Bailey Peavy Bailey Cowan Heckaman founding partner Ken Bailey was recently named to Texas Lawyer’s list of 2016 Professional Excellence Award: Lifetime Achievers.

AUG 2, 2016 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: MAY 9, 2023

Texas Lawyer magazine annually recognizes lawyers who made their mark on the legal profession through their extraordinary careers. The publication’s September issue will include full profiles of the honorees, and they will be honored with an awards ceremony at the Belo Mansion in Dallas on September 13.

Bailey was one of only 18 lawyers named to 2016’s list of Lifetime Achievers. “I want to thank Texas Lawyer for this recognition,” Bailey said in a written statement. “I am honored and humbled to be included in a list of distinguished legal colleagues who I know either personally or professionally.”

Bailey founded the law firm that is now Bailey Peavy Bailey Cowan Heckaman (BPB) in 2005 after spending years representing victims suffering from cancer and other lung injuries caused by asbestos exposure, persons injured by explosions and prescription drugs, and representing state governments against companies attempting to fleece state coffers. Most notably, Williams Bailey Law Firm, of which Bailey was a founding partner, represented the State of Texas against Big Tobacco along with four other law firms in 1997. The legal team successfully secured the then-largest multi-billion dollar settlement in the history of the United States, totaling $17.3 billion.

“Over the past 44 years, I have met so many good and wonderful people who needed assistance,” said Bailey. “My life, both legally and personally, has been driven by the motto that when someone says ‘I need help,’ that is a call to action. I hope I am being honored with this recognition for my assistance to those who have asked me for help. I also hope that my relationships, both as a lawyer and a friend, were beneficial for the people I have counseled throughout my career.”

Bailey’s success continues at BPB, having secured hundreds of millions of dollars in settlements and verdicts since the firm’s doors opened over a decade ago, including the recent recovery of hundreds of millions of dollars for victims injured by false and misleading antipsychotic drug marketing practices. His firm continues to litigate against major drug companies and others that profit from selling dangerous products to unknowing consumers. BPB is also a nationally leading firm representing injured and dying victims of asbestos exposure.

BPB is a trial-ready and tested firm passionate about fighting for the underdog. With decades of experience, the attorneys at Bailey Peavy Bailey Cowan Heckaman have built a reputation of grit and tenacity in the courtroom, as well as care, concern, and quality service for its clients.

Contact Bailey Peavy Bailey Cowan Heckaman directly by calling us at (888) 367-7160, or visit our website at https://www.bpblaw.com.

Ali Choudri Files State Court Suit Claiming Wrongful Foreclosure before Judge Michael Gomez

2503 S. Shepherd Dr., 2502 and 2424 Huldy St., 9201 Memorial Drive and 2727 Kirby 26L, Houston Texas are the properties in dispute.

Pro Hac Vice by IFP Application: Sanctioned Lawyer Ray L. Shackelford Appears Without Authority

LIT’s watched Shackelford appear in many of his removed foreclosure cases without submitting a pro hac vice application and fees.

Zions Bancorporation and Cenlar FSB Dash to Foreclose on Thrash’s $9M Dollar Residential Estate

Dr John Thrash has owned the property since 1994. He’s been litigating this dispute in a few proceedings this year about the same property.

Lawyer Ken Bailey: Honey, Here’s Our $3.3M Home for Ten Bucks. That’ll Keep the Zombie Warrior Away
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To Top