202126089 –
MELBER, KENNETH vs. BAILEY, F KENNETH JR
(Court 281, JUDGE CHRISTINE WEEMS)
APR 30, 2021 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: MAY 9, 2023
Default judgment signed by Judge Weems (datestamped August 8, 2023), awarding Kruckemeyer his attorney fees ($5k) and client his judgment of appx $1.4 million, without the need for any loan paperwork or agreements. See; Flores v. Hun Chang, No. 01-20-00421-CV, at *12 (Tex. App. June 30, 2022) (“ Although pleadings are not evidence, no evidence is necessary to support a default judgment because the defendant’s failure to answer is taken as admitting the allegations of the petition. Huynh v. Vo, No. 01-02-00295-CV, 2003 WL 1848607, at *1 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] Apr. 10, 2003, no pet.) (mem. op.).”)
Case (Cause) Number | Style | File Date | Court | Case Region | Type Of Action / Offense | |
201374628- 7 Disposed (Final) |
TEXAS CAPITAL BANK NA vs. BAILEY JR, KENNETH F | 12/12/2013 | 190 | Civil | OTHER CIVIL | |
197942071- 7 Purged |
KAYE, DONALD B vs. FLOUR ENGINEERS & CONSTRUCTORS |
9/25/1979 | 234 | Civil | DAMAGES (OTHER) |
TCPA IN TEXAS 2023
“It’s a matter of public concern” @SupremeCourt_TX @JusticeLehrmann sayeth Rusty Hardin. Have a Rusty Nail or two and reverse and render for the Bailey’s.
Ingredients:
2 oz Scotch whisky
1 oz Baileys Irish Cream
Serve with Icehttps://t.co/4eEO43cKBe#TWO— lawsinusa (@lawsinusa) November 14, 2023
202126090 –
KRM INVESTMENTS INC vs. BAILEY, F KENNETH
(Court 127, JUDGE RAVI K. SANDILL)
APR 30, 2021 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: MAY 9, 2023
Writ returned. No assets. Retired lawyer. Fixed income. Dementia. No non-exempt assets.
Plaintiff’s Cert Written Discovery
Request for Writ of Execution
ORDER SIGNED SUBSTITUTING ATTORNEY OF RECORD
DEFENDANT COSTS
MONETARY DAMAGES AWARDED
ORDER SIGNED AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES
Kruckemeyer’s known Ken Melber since 2010. Kruckemeyer submits time sheets at $450 and $475 per hr but affidavit says his charge out rate is $500. He also wants $25k for any appeal or supreme court petition. LIT has seen this in state court filings and in LIT’s opinion, judgments of this nature – including fees before any proceeding commences – is unconstitutional, period.
Lawyer Anthony S Muharib buys Judge Ravi Sandill’s Home as Judge Upgrades to $4M River Oaks Pad – Laws In Texas https://t.co/Q5bahK7btV
— lawsinusa (@lawsinusa) May 9, 2023
202126091 –
JVH INTERESTS INC vs. BAILEY, F KENNETH (JR)
(Court 269, JUDGE CORY SEPOLIO)
APR 30, 2021 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: MAY 9, 2023
Writ returned. No assets. Retired lawyer. Fixed income. Dementia. No non-exempt assets.
DEFAULT JUDGMENT SIGNED | 05/10/2023 | |
MONETARY DAMAGES AWARDED | 05/10/2023 | |
ORDER SIGNED AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES |
Kruckemeyer’s boilerplate default judgment request, awarding Kruckemeyer his attorney fees and client his judgment.
Kruckemeyer’s known Ken Melber since 2010. Kruckemeyer submits time sheets at $450 and $475 per hr but affidavit says his charge out rate is $500. He also wants $25k for any appeal or supreme court petition. LIT has seen this in state court filings and in LIT’s opinion, judgments of this nature – including fees before any proceeding commences – is unconstitutional, period.
Debt Collectin’ Lawyer Nathan Milliron’s Firm Doesn’t Have an Active Surety Bond with TX SOS – Laws In Texas https://t.co/bJPIJw45pG
— lawsinusa (@lawsinusa) May 9, 2023
202351403 –
VIRAGE SPV 1 LLC vs. F KENNETH BAILEY JR P C
(Court 152)
AUG 9, 2023 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: NOV 15, 2023
Response in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment:
LIT: How can you represent someone with dementia, Johnie Patterson?
Comes now Plaintiff Virage SPV I LLC (“Virage”), and regarding its motion to compel, filed on February 13, 2024, states as follows:
1. The Court heard Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel on March 8, 2024.
At the time, the Court granted Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel and issued the Order, attached as Exhibit 1, compelling production of documents.
2. Since the time of the Order, counsel for Plaintiff and Defendants have conferred in good faith.
Counsel for Defendants has provided some updates as to the availability of certain information, but no new documents have been produced or discovery responses have been propounded since the date of the Order.
3. Given the two months between the date of the Order and the renewed hearing date, Plaintiff is requesting that Defendants either
(1) produce any further responsive documents and provide any updated within two weeks of the date of the hearing; or
(2) confirm no further responsive documents and no further discovery responses will be provided.
4. Such an order will allow this case to move forward expeditiously and avoid further discovery disputes regarding the information responsive to Plaintiff’s discovery requests that were subject to the Motion.
Dated: June 4, 2024 Respectfully Submitted,
AHMAD, ZAVITSANOS & MENSING, PLLC
ORD SGN GRNTNG PROTECTION FROM DISCOVERY REQUEST (ATTORNEY EYES ONLY PROTECTIVE ORDER)
Texas: The $4 Million Dollar Wrongful Foreclosure Judgment Against Deutsche Bank and PHH Ocwen
Texan Dilemma: Will the corrupt Texas Courts and Gov. collude to settle with Deutsche Bank and PHH Ocwen, or obliterate $4M judgment? https://t.co/RxBRMDyK0R#appellatetwitter #TWO
— lawsinusa (@lawsinusa) November 5, 2023
Bailey Four Canyon Ranch Properties, Ltd.
(18-34527)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas
AUG 13, 2018 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: APR 27, 2022
Notice of Abandonment (Dec. 27, 2021)
In the context of a bankruptcy case, a notice of abandonment of real property is a legal document filed by a bankruptcy trustee or debtor in possession that relinquishes their interest in a piece of real property that is part of the bankruptcy estate.
Abandonment means that the trustee or debtor in possession is giving up any right or claim to the property, and it is no longer considered part of the bankruptcy estate. This notice is usually filed when the trustee determines that the value of the property is not worth the cost of administering and selling it for the benefit of creditors.
Once the notice of abandonment is filed, the debtor or any other interested party may take possession of the property and may use or dispose of it as they wish. It is important to note that the abandonment of real property does not relieve the debtor of any existing liens or encumbrances on the property.
Overall, a notice of abandonment of real property in a federal bankruptcy case means that the trustee or debtor in possession is relinquishing their interest in the property and it is no longer considered part of the bankruptcy estate.
CONVERTED, CLOSED, PlnDue, DsclsDue, DUPFILER |
Southern District of Texas (Houston)
Bankruptcy Petition #: 18-34527
Assigned to: David R Jones Chapter 7 Previous chapter 11 Original chapter 11 Voluntary Asset
Debtor disposition: Discharge Not Applicable |
|
Debtor Bailey Four Canyon Ranch Properties, Ltd. 5555 San Felipe Suite 900 Houston, TX 77056 HARRIS-TX Tax ID / EIN: 76-0582686 |
represented by | Richard L Fuqua, II Fuqua & Associates, PC 8558 Katy Freeway Suite 119 Houston, TX 77024 713-960-0277 Email: fuqua@fuqualegal.com |
Trustee Christopher R Murray Jones Murray LLP 602 Sawyer St Ste 400 Houston, TX 77007 832-529-1999 |
||
U.S. Trustee US Trustee Office of the US Trustee 515 Rusk Ave Ste 3516 Houston, TX 77002 713-718-4650 |
represented by | Hector Duran, Jr U.S. Trustee 515 Rusk Ste 3516 Houston, Tx 77002 7137184650 Email: Hector.Duran.Jr@usdoj.gov |
Filing Date | # | Docket Text | |
---|---|---|---|
12/26/2021 | 111 (1 pg) |
Notice of Abandonment of Real Property in Tyler County Filed by Christopher R Murray (Murray, Christopher) (Entered: 12/26/2021) | |
02/07/2022 | 112 (1 pg) |
Order Approving Trustee’s Compensation and Expenses (Related Doc 107). Signed on 2/7/2022. (VrianaPortillo) (Entered: 02/07/2022) | |
02/09/2022 | 113 (3 pgs) |
BNC Certificate of Mailing. (Related document(s):112 Order on Trustee’s Application for Compensation and Expenses) No. of Notices: 5. Notice Date 02/09/2022. (Admin.) (Entered: 02/09/2022) | |
03/22/2022 | 114 | The United States Trustee has reviewed the Chapter 7 Trustee’s Final Account and Distribution Report Certification that the Estate has been Fully Administered and Application to be Discharged. The United States Trustee does not object to the relief requested. (United States Trustee SDTXts, Trish) (Entered: 03/22/2022) | |
03/22/2022 | 115 (7 pgs) |
Chapter 7 Trustee’s Final Account and Distribution Report Certification that the Estate has been Fully Administered and Application to be Discharged (United States Trustee SDTXts, Trish) (Entered: 03/22/2022) | |
04/25/2022 | 116 (1 pg) |
Final Decree Signed on 4/25/2022 (hcar) (Entered: 04/25/2022) | |
04/27/2022 | 117 (3 pgs) |
BNC Certificate of Mailing. (Related document(s):116 Final Decree) No. of Notices: 1. Notice Date 04/27/2022. (Admin.) (Entered: 04/27/2022) |
PACER Service Center | |||
---|---|---|---|
Transaction Receipt | |||
05/09/2023 21:47:40 |
Lawyer Randy Sorrels is Debt Collecting for his law firm PRO SE in Harris County D. Court 234 (Judge Reeder). His hrly rate is $900 or just shy of $2m per yr. Regular corporate entities have to retain a law firm.https://t.co/rsPuid0dBI @astros @HoustonTexans @statebaroftexas pic.twitter.com/4waeUpkqjN
— lawsinusa (@lawsinusa) April 22, 2023
TEXAS SUPREME COURT: 23-0859
FLOYD KENNETH BAILEY, JR. AND KENNETH CAMP BAILEY
v.
ADAM PEAVY AND ADAM PEAVY PC
OCT 13, 2023 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: NOV 14, 2023
Uncovering the Next Personal Injury Law Firm Lawyer Protected by Harris County District Judges from LIT: https://t.co/8YPS5wLdAx @rks127th @MikeEngelhart @CDMenefee @txag @statebaroftexas @JusticeWillett @RMFifthCircuit @courthouse_mom @JacksonLeeTX18 @Jackson_Walker #txlege #TMO pic.twitter.com/intBrprA0Y
— lawsinusa (@lawsinusa) November 14, 2023
Houston Lawyer Sues Former Partners, Alleging They ‘Cheated Him Out of Millions’
JAN 29, 2019 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: MAY 9, 2023
Houston plaintiffs lawyer Adam Peavy is at odds with his former partners, Ken Bailey and Camp Bailey, alleging in a newly filed lawsuit that he was promised millions in fees that his former firm never paid.
“Peavy was involved in cases that generated hundreds of millions in fees for the firm, but the Baileys have cheated him out of the compensation he was owed—like so many other lawyers the Baileys have stiffed or cheated the past few years,” Peavy alleges in a petition he filed on Monday in state district court in Houston.
Peavy, now a solo practitioner in Houston, alleges that the Baileys shortchanged him for his tort litigation work, including his work on a case involving the antidepressant Paxil.
Camp Bailey is a founding partner of Bailey Cowan Heckaman, and his father, Ken Bailey, a former partner in the firm, is now of counsel. When asked to respond to the allegations in the suit, Camp Bailey said the suit is “wrong, unfortunate and misguided” and they will defend it vigorously.
Alan Daughtry, a solo practitioner in Houston who represents Peavy, said Peavy is owed, easily, $5 million in fees or more.
Peavy alleges in Peavy v. Bailey that he entered into an agreement in 2008 with the firm, then called Bailey Perrin & Bailey, to work on Paxil litigation for 5 percent of gross recovery of the litigation, whether by settlement or judgment. Peavy alleges that he “took over complete control” of the firm’s Paxil docket, and did the bulk of the work on the litigation for a joint venture Bailey Perrin had entered into with another firm.
“Meanwhile, the Baileys did nothing,” Peavy alleges in the petition. “They never attended a hearing, deposition, client meeting, trial or settlement meeting.”
Peavy was involved in the first Paxil trial in September 2009, his petition said, and the plaintiff’s team won a multimillion-dollar verdict.
After the first group of Paxil suits settled, Peavy alleged, he was responsible for organizing the suits for settlement and payment, and “the Baileys did nothing.” Then, he said, in a “glimpse of things to come,” the Baileys failed to compensate him on $12 million of the fee income, which he didn’t learn about until 2018.
“At the time of the settlement, Peavy had no clue that the Baileys misstated the amount of recovery, and they never provided any accounting to substantiate the compensation he received,” Peavy alleged in the petition. “Peavy has been shorted (and damaged) by the Baileys for approximately $1 million from this misdeed alone.”
In 2011, Peavy alleged, the Baileys made him a nonequity partner in the firm, and agreed to pay him a 7 percent “profit” from the Paxil litigation and other cases. In 2013, the Baileys made him a name partner in Bailey Peavy Bailey, giving him a 10 percent interest in the firm for all litigation.
But, Peavy alleged, “during this whole period of time,” the Baileys were not sharing fees with him. Instead, they promised to “make it up to him” on future settlements, he said.
“Unfortunately, the Baileys did not live up to their rosy promises and representations of income. Instead, the Baileys gave Peavy his same old draw,” Peavy’s petition said.
Just months after he was made a name partner in the firm, the Baileys took out a loan in March 2014, borrowing against Paxil fees, Peavy alleged. “Apparently, the Baileys pocketed a loan of $17 million for themselves,” the petition said, adding that the loan was taken out in the firm’s name without informing him.
Peavy also alleged that the firm failed to pay him after getting $40 million in fees from a vaginal mesh litigation.
The Baileys agreed to give Peavy 20 percent equity in a newly created firm, Bailey Peavy Bailey Cowan Heckaman, in 2015.
In 2016, Peavy was involved in two trials that led to a global settlement in Paxil litigation, his petition said, and to get payments he had to secure approval from “hundreds of clients.” Despite that work, Peavy alleged, Camp Bailey took 20 percent off the top of the Paxil income for “referral fees.”
Later, the Baileys claimed that the $46 million in fees and expenses the firm was paid in 2018 for Paxil litigation was “all gone” and the litigation was not profitable, the petition said.
In his petition, Peavy alleged the Baileys failed to pay him what he is due, even though they claimed they would. His causes of action include breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, fraudulent transfer, and conspiracy, and he seeks more than $1 million in actual and exemplary damages.
“They refused every last chance to do right by him. They short-changed him on fees by millions of dollars, stopped his draw, and canceled his medical benefits,” the petition said.
Sealed and Submitted, Apr. 6, 2023 for Opinion
Ken Bailey Wins Texas Lawyer’s 2016 Professional Excellence Award
Bailey Peavy Bailey Cowan Heckaman founding partner Ken Bailey was recently named to Texas Lawyer’s list of 2016 Professional Excellence Award: Lifetime Achievers.
AUG 2, 2016 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: MAY 9, 2023
Texas Lawyer magazine annually recognizes lawyers who made their mark on the legal profession through their extraordinary careers. The publication’s September issue will include full profiles of the honorees, and they will be honored with an awards ceremony at the Belo Mansion in Dallas on September 13.
Bailey was one of only 18 lawyers named to 2016’s list of Lifetime Achievers. “I want to thank Texas Lawyer for this recognition,” Bailey said in a written statement. “I am honored and humbled to be included in a list of distinguished legal colleagues who I know either personally or professionally.”
Bailey founded the law firm that is now Bailey Peavy Bailey Cowan Heckaman (BPB) in 2005 after spending years representing victims suffering from cancer and other lung injuries caused by asbestos exposure, persons injured by explosions and prescription drugs, and representing state governments against companies attempting to fleece state coffers. Most notably, Williams Bailey Law Firm, of which Bailey was a founding partner, represented the State of Texas against Big Tobacco along with four other law firms in 1997. The legal team successfully secured the then-largest multi-billion dollar settlement in the history of the United States, totaling $17.3 billion.
“Over the past 44 years, I have met so many good and wonderful people who needed assistance,” said Bailey. “My life, both legally and personally, has been driven by the motto that when someone says ‘I need help,’ that is a call to action. I hope I am being honored with this recognition for my assistance to those who have asked me for help. I also hope that my relationships, both as a lawyer and a friend, were beneficial for the people I have counseled throughout my career.”
Bailey’s success continues at BPB, having secured hundreds of millions of dollars in settlements and verdicts since the firm’s doors opened over a decade ago, including the recent recovery of hundreds of millions of dollars for victims injured by false and misleading antipsychotic drug marketing practices. His firm continues to litigate against major drug companies and others that profit from selling dangerous products to unknowing consumers. BPB is also a nationally leading firm representing injured and dying victims of asbestos exposure.
BPB is a trial-ready and tested firm passionate about fighting for the underdog. With decades of experience, the attorneys at Bailey Peavy Bailey Cowan Heckaman have built a reputation of grit and tenacity in the courtroom, as well as care, concern, and quality service for its clients.
Contact Bailey Peavy Bailey Cowan Heckaman directly by calling us at (888) 367-7160, or visit our website at https://www.bpblaw.com.