First Amendment

Disbarred Lyin’ Lawyer Mark Cantu Loses 5 Year Defamation Case Where He Sued the Journalists for Reporting the Facts

The ruling was made under provisions of a state law that protect First Amendment rights by discouraging frivolous lawsuits, called anti-SLAPP.

AIM Media newspapers awarded $150,000 in defamation suit

Originally Published: March 8, 2020 | Republished by LIT: Dec. 5, 2020

EDINBURG — A judge awarded The Monitor and its parent corporation AIM Media Texas $150,000 for legal fees incurred while defending itself against a frivolous defamation lawsuit.

Judge Luis M. Singleterry of the 92nd state District Court ruled against former attorney Mark A. Cantu on Tuesday.

In May 2015, Cantu sued The Monitor, Valley Morning Star, a former editor and a reporter for defamation for reporting on a Texas Supreme Court decision that found the former attorney colluded with a juror to obtain a $3 million settlement during a personal injury trial in 2014.

“The judgment entered today by Judge Singleterry is hopefully the last chapter in defending The Monitor’s and the Star’s free press rights in a case of enormous public importance,” AIM Media Texas attorney John Bussian said. “The journalists for The Monitor and the Star, as the court of appeals found earlier in the litigation, were simply reporting what the courts had to say about Mr. Cantu’s conduct and the public has a right to know about that.”

The ruling was made under provisions of a state law that protect First Amendment rights by discouraging frivolous lawsuits, called anti-SLAPP or Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation.

Cantu’s 2017 Appeal at 13th COA.

Singleterry issued the same ruling against Cantu in October 2017, but Cantu appealed the decision to the 13th Court of Appeals, which dismissed his lawsuit in its entirety and remanded the case back to Singleterry.

The parties argued their case again in Singleterry’s court in August 2019, and six months later, the judge issued the final judgement.

“We were hopeful throughout the course of this case that our constitutional right to publish the news, generally and of course in this case about the judicial community, would be upheld,” said Stephan Wingert, publisher and editor of The Monitor as well as regional vice president for AIM Media Texas. “This judgment shows our faith in these proceedings, and in our case, was well-placed, and we are certainly pleased with the outcome.”

Singleterry also included future legal fees in case Cantu decides to appeal his ruling. Cantu will have to pay AIM Media Texas $25,000 for an appeal to the Court of Appeals or $10,000 if he files a petition for review in the Texas Supreme Court. If the Supreme Court calls for briefs, he’ll have to pay an additional $25,000, and if the court decides to hear arguments, he’ll have to pay another $10,000.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Most Popular

Laws In Texas is a blog about the Financial Crisis and how the banks and government are colluding against the citizens and homeowners of the State of Texas and relying on a system of #FakeDocs and post-crisis legal precedents, specially created by the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to foreclose on homeowners around this great State. We are not lawyers. We do not offer legal advice. We are citizens of the State of Texas who have spent a decade in the court system in Texas and have been party to during this period to the good, the bad and the very ugly.

Donate to LawsInTexas. Make a Difference.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

We keep your data private and share your data only with third parties that make this service possible. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

© 2020-21 LawInTexas com is an online trading name which is wholly owned by Blogger Inc., a nonprofit 501(c)(3) registered in Delaware. | All Rights Reserved.

To Top