Burke v. Hopkins et al
S.D. Tex. and CA5 Appeal (20-20209)
Currently on Appeal, [ASSUMED] it has been stayed while FHFA case resolved at U.S. Supreme Court. See email correspondence below from CA5.
Gilmer v. Higley, 110 U.S. 47 (1884)
It seems very clear that to require him to state whether his fare was demanded of him by the regular agent of this company, and on his refusal to pay he was ordered to leave the coach and refused, was an examination in regard to the very thing about which he testified in chief. To permit a party to the suit to tell his own tale of a transaction like this, and to conceal what is important to the defendant in regard to the same occurrence and at the same time, would be a gross perversion of justice, and would bring into discredit the policy of permitting parties to actions to testify in their own behalf.
3-Panel
Lead is Snr Judge Edith Clement in this 3-panel, Judge Stephen Higginson was panel member and author of the first erroneous opinion in Deutsche I (15-20201) and Judge JW Elrod is Mrs. Federalist Society and Ethics Backup Singer.
STRIKE HOPKINS REPLY AS VOID (JUL 28)
STRIKE HOPKINS REPLY RE SANCTIONS (JUL 28)
HOPKINS RESPONSE TO SANCTIONS (JULY 19, 2021)
CORRECT OPINION (JUL 18)
MOTION FOR SANCTIONS (JUL 8)
MOTION TO CLARIFY (JUL 8)
CA5 LETTER (JUNE 29)
MOTION TO DISQUALIFY
MOTION TO STAY (JUN 28)
MAY 12 & JUNE 7, 2021
PAPER COPIES (MAY 5 ORDER)
DISPUTING DEFICIENCY (APR 23)
APR 6, 2021
PETITION EN BANC (APR 5)
APR 2, 2021
NEW 3-PANEL OPINION (MAR. 30)
JAN 19, 2021
NOV 18, 2020
NOV 6, 2020
OCT 16, 2020
OCT 5, 2020
OCT 2, 2020
JULY 30, 2020
JULY 27, 2020
JULY 6, 2020
MAR 27, 2020
Burke v. Ocwen et al
S.D. Tex. and CA5 Appeal (19-20267)
Currently on Appeal, [ASSUMED] it has been stayed while FHFA case resolved at U.S. Supreme Court. See email correspondence below from CA5.
Via Email: Oct 5, 2020 to CA5
Dear Clerk of Court
On the 21st of Sept, en banc held oral argument in the case of CFPB v. All American Check Cashing Inc., case #18-60302. This is pertinent to our appeals, cases #19-20267 and 20-20209.
However there is no available MP3 download on your website as at 10/5/2020, some 2 weeks later.
We would respectfully ask when is this oral argument going to be available on your website at your oral argument recordings section?
Thanking you in advance for your assistance in this matter.
Sincerely
Joanna Burke
—————————
Ms. Burke,
Case 18-60302 was not heard on 9/21/20, therefore there is no recording to make available. The case was removed from the calendar on 9/8/20 and has been placed in abeyance pending a decision in 2 US Supreme Court cases, 19-422 & 19-563.
3-Panel
Lead is Judge Patrick Higginbotham in this 3-panel, Judge Leslie Southwick maintains a relatively low key position barring the odd high profile political case, and former Supreme Court Justice and Twitter ‘laureate’ Judge Don Ray Willett.
JULY 19, 2020
MAR 26, 2020
DEC 13, 2019
DEC 12, 2019
NOV 10, 2019
Burke v. Ocwen et al, Intervention II
S.D. Fl and CA11 Appeal (21-12160)
The Burkes are back for Round II.
WAIVE PAPER COPIES (JUL 19)
INITIAL BRIEF DUE AUG 4 (JUL 19)
RECONSIDERATION AND RECUSAL DENIED (JUN 10)
Burke v. Ocwen et al, Intervention
S.D. Fl and CA11 Appeal (19-13015)
Judicial and Legal Lawlessness ended the Burke’s motion to intervene, but not their will for justice to prevail.
This page provides you with a detailed timeline of the events of the Burke’s intervention (denied) in Florida by S.D. Fl. District Court and on Appeal to the 11th Circuit.
Questions That Need Answers
In order to effect change, we need your strength. A determined community of civilians and organizations that see the value in our campaign:
“Restore Moral Integrity to Texas Courts”. #RESTORETX
Steve Mnuchin
Why is government, and in particular, the part of government that controls mortgages and lending, led by US Treasurer and active “foreclosure king” Steve Mnuchin, formerly of IndyMac and OneWest?
Conflict of Interest.
Joseph Otting
How about Mnuchin’s newly appointed colleague, Joseph Otting, Comptroller of the Currency.
Why is he leading the OCC? This was the individual who would write to the OCC in his role as CEO at OneWest Bank (now CIT) asking for documentation from the FDIC to help expedite foreclosures due to “lost paperwork”.
Mick Mulvaney
A lawyer defending foreclosure lawyers from a position in Government called a “Consumer” department (CFPB).
Why is the CFPB writing Amicus Briefs for the pending Obduskey Supreme Court case when they are called the “consumer” agency – yet supporting debt collecting foreclosure lawyers?
Tommy Bastian
Why is the Supreme Court of Texas Task Force filled with Foreclosure Mill attorneys like Tommy Bastian of Barrett Daffin (BDFTE) who are pushing House Bills to expedite foreclosure?
Why are the oral hearing tapes being suppressed when these Task Forces admit on the record to fraud on the court by fabrication of documentation required to foreclose?
LIT COMMENTARY
LIT’s promise to hold outlaws in robes accountable and in the public domain remains firm.
Here’s 2020’s end of year hall of shame for the Federal District Court and Appellate Circuit Judges.
2021 Most Wanted Stamp Collection Part I.
Outlaws in Robes. A LIT Series. https://t.co/GxZKmIgNIU
No Bull. Just the Truth.
We Light Up Corruption. pic.twitter.com/pA4Lu6rI5H— LawsInTexas (@lawsintexasusa) December 24, 2020
