Appellate Circuit

Rent a Government Watchdog: Is Tony Alexis Of Counsel for CFPB while at Goodwin Procter?

Is Anthony Alexis currently skipping between both Goodwin Procter and CFPB or what the legal standing is for this gentleman who is an attorney for both?

CASE NO. 19-13015-D



                                         Plaintiff – Appellee



OCWEN MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC., a U. S. Virgin Islands corporation,


OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

Defendants – Appellees



Intervenor Plaintiffs – Appellants.

On Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Florida, Houston


District Court Docket No. 9:17-cv-80495-KAM



May 28, 2020

Appellants, Joanna Burke and John Burke (“Burkes”), now file a Motion seeking clarification as to why Anthony ‘Tony’ Alexis is listed on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s CIP as an attorney for Plaintiff’s (CFPB)?

“Tony Alexis is a partner in Goodwin’s Financial Industry and Consumer Financial Services Litigation practices and serves as the head of the firm’s (Goodwin Procter’s “Goodwin”) Consumer Financial Services Enforcement practice.”

The Burkes have identified and the court is clearly aware, the ‘opposing parties’ colluded against the Burkes in this case. This is now firmly evidenced by the fact that Mr. Alexis, per Goodwin’s website bio, states, in part;

“Prior to joining Goodwin in 2017, Mr. Alexis served as Assistant Director and Head of the Office of Enforcement at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), where he developed and managed the CFPB’s enforcement strategy, consumer financial investigations and litigation.”

Goodwin Procter’s Other Trials and Tribulations: The Burkes are alarmed, as they uncover more and more unethical and criminal acts by Goodwin. In preparation of a deluge of formal written complaints against these lawyers to their respective State Bar(s), the Burkes are investigating.

What the Burkes have unearthed is a modern day “Erin Brockovich”. One of extreme deception and corrupt acts by this large law firm. These findings will be addressed separately and in conjunction with this case and the ethics complaints that will be forthcoming.

As Brockovich says on her website;

“Often times we don’t think about or worry about or understand what is happening to another until it happens to us. Deceits have no boundaries. Disease doesn’t recognize the color of our skin or our political parties affiliation. When it comes to cover-ups and destruction of our environment, we are all up for grabs.”

Conclusion: The Burkes appreciate the call today from the court expressing that the Burkes reply was deficient due to the “One Attorney, One Filing” rule for Reply Brief(s) and that the Burkes have to resubmit one brief on or by June 11, 2020.

As such, the Burkes respectfully requests clarification if Mr. Alexis has represented CFPB in this case or the lower court proceedings, is currently skipping between both Goodwin and CFPB as “of counsel” or what the legal standing is for this gentleman.

After all, the filer of the reply brief for the CFPB, Mr. Barrett, also has a pseudonym depending on where he files cases on behalf of the CFPB. To be frank, it is  very confusing and clandestine.

Respectfully submitted,

Rogue Florida Lawyers, Russians, Real Estate and Fraud Claims Assigned to Judge Marra’s Courtroom. Here’s What Happened Next

The facts of this court order is limited to whether or not two attorney’s should be sanctioned by Marra and delegated to Magistrate Judge Matthewman. In the end, another standard issue, wordsmithed opinion dismisses the motion for sanctions.

Operation Whiteout: Lyin’ Senior Judge Kenneth “Magic” Marra Tosses CFPB Claims

Judge Kenneth A. Marra’s Void Order Granting Ocwen’s Motion for Summary Judgment on 9 out of 10 Claims on the basis of Res Judicata in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Ocwen Financial Corp. Inc., S.D. Fl.

No Glossin’ Required on a Void Order Sayeth The Constitution. Fraud By The Court Commands Reversal.

The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that federal courts possess the inherent power to vacate their own judgments upon proof that a fraud has been perpetrated upon the court.

Rent a Government Watchdog: Is Tony Alexis Of Counsel for CFPB while at Goodwin Procter?
1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. Pingback: Former Florida Foreclosure Defense Lawyer Indicted -

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Laws In Texas is a blog about the Financial Crisis and how the banks and government are colluding against the citizens and homeowners of the State of Texas and relying on a system of #FakeDocs and post-crisis legal precedents, specially created by the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to foreclose on homeowners around this great State. We are not lawyers. We do not offer legal advice. We are citizens of the State of Texas who have spent a decade in the court system in Texas and have been party to during this period to the good, the bad and the very ugly.

Donate to LawsInTexas. Make a Difference.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

We keep your data private and share your data only with third parties that make this service possible. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

© 2020-21 LawInTexas com is an online trading name which is wholly owned by Blogger Inc., a nonprofit 501(c)(3) registered in Delaware. | All Rights Reserved.

To Top