Appellate Judges

In N.D. Georgia’s Blind Draw System, there’s Obviously Only One Federal Judge. That’s Why He’s Called Chief.

No matter what Lin Woods’ state of mental health is, there is a blind draw system which federal courts claim to operate, but is frequently abused.

Judge Who Dismissed Two of Lin Wood’s Post-Election Lawsuits Won’t Recuse Himself from Wood’s Case Against the Georgia Bar

LIT COMMENT: No matter what Lin Woods’ state of mental health is, there is a blind draw system which federal courts claim to operate, but is frequently turned off for personal agendas.

MAY 10, 2021 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: MAY 11, 2021

LIN WOOD

A federal judge who dismissed two of Lin Wood’s post-election lawsuits last year—and called one of them “astonishingly speculative“—refused on Monday to recuse himself from the pro-Trump lawyer’s case against the State Bar of Georgia.

Wood sued the State Bar of Georgia earlier this year in response to the bar’s previously confidential inquiry into his post-election conduct and its related demand that he receive a mental health examination.

That case landed before U.S. District Judge Timothy Batten, a George W. Bush appointee who had previously dismissed two of Wood’s other lawsuits that landed on his docket last year after the 2020 election.

The first one, part of the so-called “Kraken” lawsuits filed with Sidney Powell, sought to decertify President Joe Biden’s victory in Georgia. Judge Batten rebuked that request as “the most extraordinary relief ever sought” in his court.

In the lead-up to the Georgia Senate runoff elections, Wood tried to challenge the constitutionality of election procedures with a conspiracy theory about Dominion Voting Systems involving dead Venezuelan autocrat Hugo Chavez.

“Not only is this allegation astonishingly speculative, but it also presumes that because independent bad actors allegedly fixed the election of a now-deceased Venezuelan president, fraud will recur during Georgia’s runoff,”

Batten wrote late last December.

“Even if Wood’s alleged fraudulent events were to ultimately occur, he has not shown more than a possible future injury. This is insufficient to confer standing.”

Those words may have been emphatic, but Judge Batten found that there is “nothing in the court’s handling of Wood’s earlier cases would lead to impartiality, prejudice, or bias that would require recusal.”

Initiated in early February, the Bar’s inquiry was confidential until Wood posted all 1,677 pages of its memorandum and exhibits on Telegram, an encrypted social media app where the lawyer has hundreds of thousands of followers.

The Bar’s nine-page summary recaps Wood’s post-election lawsuits, including his so-called “Kraken” lawsuits in Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Arizona with Sidney Powell.

All of those lawsuits were dismissed, and the attorneys who brought them are now facing multiple demands for sanctions and calls for their disbarment.

The summary also reprises Wood’s conspiracy theories that Chief Justice John Roberts is a “member of a club or cabal requiring minor children as an initiation fee” and that former Vice President Mike Pence is a “TRAITOR, a Communist Sympathizer & a Child Molester.”

The Bar also extensively quoted Wood’s contract dispute with three professional colleagues he used to describe as his law partners.

In a lawsuit, the colleagues described what they called Wood’s “erratic, abusive, and unprofessional behavior” from late 2019 to 2020.

Two of those former colleagues claim Wood assaulted them, and they also claim that they taped him declaring:

“I might actually be Christ coming back for a second time in the form of an imperfect man, elevating Christ consciousness.”

In an inquiry extensively quoting Wood’s comments and litigation, the State Bar of Georgia looked into whether Wood violated Rule 4-104, which allows for confidential referrals to a mental health professional to look into whether a lawyer should be removed because of mental illness.

Firing back in a lawsuit against the State Bar of Georgia, Wood insisted that the official inquiry was politically motivated and compared the psychiatric examination demand to the Salem Witch Trials. But the Bar was not alone in its concern for Wood’s mental well-being.

In a recording exclusively reported by Law&Crime’s podcast “Objections,” Wood can be heard emotionally recounting his children’s request that he get treatment.

“Right now, they want me to tell them I’ll go to a mental health healthcare professional for regular monthly therapy however long it takes, which I’m never going to do,” Wood can be heard saying of his children on one recording provided to Law&Crime.

Wood claimed that he wanted to call Judge Batten as a witness and could not do so without the jurist recusing himself.

The judge rejected that, noting that “information learned in court proceedings is not grounds for recusal.”

“Further, the Court agrees with Wood’s assertion that it never sanctioned Wood for inappropriate or unprofessional conduct or otherwise took action or filed a complaint that would call Wood’s professional conduct or mental stability into question based on Wood’s 2020 cases in this Court,” Batten’s ruling states. “This obviates the need for the undersigned to testify as a witness.”

In an email, Wood told Law&Crime that he immediately appealed the ruling.

“Judge Batten’s failure to disqualify himself from my lawsuit against the State Bar of Georgia Grievance Committee is clearly erroneous and a notice of appeal to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals was filed immediately after Batten entered the erroneous order,” Wood wrote.

Wood previously appealed the dismissal of a different post-election lawsuit to the 11th Circuit, which rejected that challenge late last year.

Creditor Rights BigLaw Firm Goodwin Procter LLP are Whining in Op-Eds for their Wall St Banking Clients

The CFPB amendments provide that a mortgage servicer can offer a streamline modification to borrowers with COVID-19-related hardship based on an incomplete package.

CFPB v Ocwen, Florida: Motion for Reconsideration and Recusal of Judge Kenneth A. Marra

This court unlawfully denied the Burkes access to court documents. Both sets of counsel conspired with the Court and committed perjury, repeatedly.

CPFB v Ocwen, Florida: Renewed Motion to Intervene and Memorandum in Support

This court unlawfully denied the Burkes access to court documents. Both sets of counsel conspired with the Court and committed perjury, repeatedly.

In N.D. Georgia’s Blind Draw System, there’s Obviously Only One Federal Judge. That’s Why He’s Called Chief.
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Laws In Texas is a blog about the Financial Crisis and how the banks and government are colluding against the citizens and homeowners of the State of Texas and relying on a system of #FakeDocs and post-crisis legal precedents, specially created by the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to foreclose on homeowners around this great State. We are not lawyers. We do not offer legal advice. We are citizens of the State of Texas who have spent a decade in the court system in Texas and have been party to during this period to the good, the bad and the very ugly.

Donate to LawsInTexas. Make a Difference.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

We keep your data private and share your data only with third parties that make this service possible. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

© 2020-21 LawInTexas com is an online trading name which is wholly owned by Blogger Inc., a nonprofit 501(c)(3) registered in Delaware. | All Rights Reserved.

To Top