LIT COMMENTARY & UPDATES
JUN 1 27, 2024
“OVERWORKED” JUDGE MARK PITTMAN SELF-RECUSES: REASSIGNED TO JUDGE REED O’CONNOR AS SHELLEY HOPKINS STEPS IN TO RESPOND TO LAWSUIT
How is it that Mark Hopkins is filing for extensions of time “for the forseeable future” due to his lawyer brother Mike’s terminal illness on May 6, 2024 – but it able to pull together a motion to dismiss less than 3 weeks later?
U.S. District Court
Northern District of Texas (Fort Worth)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 4:24-cv-00389-O-BJ
Nicholson v. Barrett Daffin Frappier Turner & Engle LLP et al Assigned to: Judge Reed C. O’Connor Referred to: Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton Cause: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Date Filed: 05/02/2024 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Nature of Suit: 480 Other Statutes: Consumer Credit Jurisdiction: Federal Question |
Date Filed | # | Docket Text |
---|---|---|
06/17/2024 | 39 | AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF FDCPA 1692f(6) AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENT FOR QUIET TITLE ACTION against All Parties filed by Harriet Nicholson. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: Attorney Information – Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration(s) HARRIET NICHOLSON’S DECLARATION TO SUPPORT SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT, # 2 Exhibit(s) APPENDIX WITH EXHIBITS TO SUPPORT HARRIET NICHOLSON DECLARATION AND SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT) (Nicholson, Harriet) (Entered: 06/17/2024) |
06/18/2024 | 40 | ELECTRONIC ORDER finding as moot 33 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim per [doc. 39]. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 6/18/2024) (chmb) (Entered: 06/18/2024) |
06/24/2024 | 41 | MOTION for Summary Judgment PLAINTIFF’ S PARTIAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT BARRETT DAFFIN FRAPPIER TURNER & ENGLE LLP FOR COUNT 1, VIOLATION OF FDCPA 1692f(6) filed by Harriet Nicholson (Nicholson, Harriet) (Entered: 06/24/2024) |
06/24/2024 | 42 | Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Harriet Nicholson re 41 MOTION for Summary Judgment PLAINTIFF’ S PARTIAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT BARRETT DAFFIN FRAPPIER TURNER & ENGLE LLP FOR COUNT 1, VIOLATION OF FDCPA 1692f(6) (Attachments: # 1 Declaration(s) Harriet Nicholson’s Unsworn Declaration to Support Plaintiff’s Partial Motion for Summary Judgment against BDFTE, # 2 Exhibit(s) EX. B, 3.19.24 BDFTE FDCPA DEBT COLLECTOR LETTER ADMISSION, # 3 Exhibit(s) EX. C, 4.16.24 BDFTE NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEE’S SALE OF D202032012 SECURITY INTEREST, # 4 Exhibit(s) EX. D, 8.2.12, TRUSTEE’S DEED D212187326 CONVEYANCE 7.3.12 NON-JUDICIAL FORECLOSURE SALE, # 5 Exhibit(s) EX. E, 6.21.18, AFFIDAVIT OF ADVERSE POSSESSION, # 6 Proposed Order PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S PARTIAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT) (Nicholson, Harriet) (Entered: 06/24/2024) |
06/25/2024 | 43 | NOTICE of PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE OF RELATED COURT CASE 2.17.16 HEARING TRANSCRIPT filed by Harriet Nicholson (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) 048-276347-15 RELATED CASE 2.17.16 HEARING TRANSCRIPT HARRIET NICHOLSON V. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC) (Nicholson, Harriet) (Entered: 06/25/2024) |
06/25/2024 | 44 | NOTICE of REQUEST TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE OF RELATED CASE TRANSCRIPT filed by Harriet Nicholson (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) 8.4.20 342-262692-12 HEARING TRANSCIPT MOTION TO REINSTATE STRICKEN PARTIES RELATED CASE) (Nicholson, Harriet) (Entered: 06/25/2024) |
06/25/2024 | 45 | NOTICE of CORRECTED 8.4.20 HEARING TRANSCRPT 342-262692-12 ALL PAGES re: 44 Notice (Other), filed by Harriet Nicholson (Nicholson, Harriet) (Entered: 06/25/2024) |
06/25/2024 | 46 | New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). No prior sanctions found. (For court use only – links to the national and circuit indexes.) File to: Judge O Connor. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (bdb) (Entered: 06/25/2024) |
06/25/2024 | 47 | NOTICE of PLAINTIFF’S MOTION REQUESTING COURT TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE OF COURT RECORD filed by Harriet Nicholson (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) 8.16.20 342-262692-12 HEARING TRANSCRIPT) (Nicholson, Harriet) (Entered: 06/25/2024) |
06/27/2024 | 48 | Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Barrett Daffin Frappier Turner & Engle LLP with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Hopkins, Shelley) (Entered: 06/27/2024) |
06/27/2024 | 49 | Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Barrett Daffin Frappier Turner & Engle LLP with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) A, # 2 Exhibit(s) B, # 3 Proposed Order) (Hopkins, Shelley) (Entered: 06/27/2024) |
06/27/2024 | 50 | ELECTRONIC ORDER finding as moot 48 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim per ECF No. 49. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 6/27/2024) (chmb) (Entered: 06/27/2024) |
PACER Service Center | |||
---|---|---|---|
Transaction Receipt | |||
06/27/2024 17:16:23 |
CFPB: Even if a foreclosure mill engages in a nonjudicial foreclosure, the debt collector is still subject to FDCPA which prohibit taking or threatening to take any nonjudicial action to effect dispossession or disablement of property if the debt collector has no present right. pic.twitter.com/wN7mAC9ebv
— lawsinusa (@lawsinusa) May 24, 2024
[Harriet] Nicholson v. Barrett Daffin Frappier Turner & Engle LLP [and The Bank Of New York Mellon]
(4:24-cv-00389)
District Court, N.D. Texas, Judge Mark T. Pittman Presidin’
MAY 2, 2024 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: JUN 1, 2024
LIT: Despite the Judge’s History with Harriet Nicholson, a Transfer Was Unnecessary, Per the Law When the Case was “Randomly Assigned”
“A judge’s prior rulings against a party are generally insufficient bases for recusal or disqualification, or for having another judge decide that issue.
Calhoun v. Villa, No. H-18-20080, 2019 WL 643531, at *3 (5th Cir. Feb. 14, 2019) (citing Liteky v. United States, 510 U.S. 540, 556 (1994)).
There is no basis here to conclude that a thoughtful and objective observer, acquainted with the relevant facts, would question Judge Hittner’s impartiality.
See Andrade v. Chojnacki, 338 F.3d 448, 455 (5th Cir. 2003). -Fan Gu v. Invista S.A.R.L., CIVIL ACTION No. H-19-562, at *2 (S.D. Tex. May 6, 2019)
SO WHY DID JUDGE MEANS SUA SPONTE “TRANSFER”?
ORDER OF TRANSFER: After review of the docket in this case, and with the transferee judge’s permission, the Court concludes that this case should be, and it is hereby, TRANSFERRED to the docket of Judge Mark Pittman. All future filings shall bear the suffix letter “P” rather than “Y.” (Ordered by Senior Judge Terry R Means on 5/3/2024) (saw) (Entered: 05/03/2024)
FORT WORTH – After spending almost 22 years on the bench, U.S. District Judge Terry Means is still haunted by the brutal abduction and murder of Arlington teenager Lisa Rene, a case that resulted in her assailants being sentenced to death.
Rene, a Lamar High School honors student, was abducted by Arkansas drug dealers from her sister’s apartment in September of 1994 to avenge a $5,000 theft by her brothers. She was raped before being bludgeoned with a shovel and buried alive in a shallow grave.
At the time, Means was quoted as saying at the sentencing of the three men who killed Rene that he “could not imagine any more heinous crime.”
“Somehow, those death penalty cases just leap to the front of my memory. You are dealing with the life of a human being,” Means told the Fort Worth Star-Telegram in a recent interview. “I still must pronounce the death sentence. You are informing someone that they will be put to death.
“That is a rare and focusing event,” said Means, 64, who is preparing to transition to what is known as “senior status” next month, a form of retirement where he will handle fewer cases.
Known in the courthouse for treating prosecutors, defense attorneys and even those accused of heinous crimes with respect, Means will be missed, courthouse observers say.
During the unveiling of Means’ official portrait at the downtown Fort Worth courthouse last week, Sidney Fitzwater, chief U.S. district judge for the Northern District, described his colleague as a true friend who was always thoughtful and fair-minded in the courtroom.
Means has a compassionate heart; but he is someone who can make the tough decisions, he said.
“Today is decidedly a day of mixed emotions,” Fitzwater said.
Looking back, Means, a thin man with salt-and-pepper hair and a gentle demeanor, said that although he tried many important cases, the death penalty cases will always weigh on his mind.
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting 23 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. The Bank Of New York Mellon shall file its answer or other response on or before July 1, 2024. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 5/29/2024) (chmb) (Entered: 05/29/2024)
Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by The Bank Of New York Mellon (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)Attorney Grant Michael Figari added to party The Bank Of New York Mellon(pty:dft) (Figari, Grant) (Entered: 05/29/2024)
Dear Mr. Hopkins,
RE; 4:24-CV-000389-P NICHOLSON V. BDFTE AND BONYM 21 DAY SAFE HARBOR NOTICE
Upon reviewing Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, para. 17, it appears citing “Obduskey v. McCarthy & Holthus LLP, 139 S.Ct. 1029, 1035–36, 586 U.S. 466, 473–74 (U.S., 2019)”, significant portions of the opinion was omitted distorting its meaning, specifically The subsection to which the limited-purpose definition refers, § 1692f(6), prohibits a “debt collector” from: “Taking or threatening to take any nonjudicial action to effect dispossession or disablement of property if—“(A) there is no present right to possession of the property …”.
Pursuant, to Rule 11(c)(2) – this is an opportunity to correct or withdraw the challenged submission before the motion for sanctions attached will be filed on June 17, 2024.
A motion for sanctions must be made separately from any other motion and must describe the specific conduct that allegedly violates Rule 11(b).
The motion must be served under Rule 5, but it must not be filed or be presented to the court if the challenged paper, claim, defense, contention, or denial is withdrawn or appropriately corrected within 21 days after service or within another time the court sets.
If warranted, the court may award to the prevailing party the reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees, incurred for the motion.
This email serves as the 21 day safe harbor notice and the Motion For Sanctions and To Strike Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is attached.
Regards,
Harriet Nicholson
Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Barrett Daffin Frappier Turner & Engle LLP with Brief/Memorandum in Support.
(Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) A, # 2 Exhibit(s) B, # 3 Proposed Order)Attorney Mark Daniel Hopkins added to party Barrett Daffin Frappier Turner & Engle LLP(pty:dft) (Hopkins, Mark) (Entered: 05/24/2024)
U.S. District Court
Northern District of Texas (Fort Worth)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 4:24-cv-00389-P-BJ
Nicholson v. Barrett Daffin Frappier Turner & Engle LLP et al Assigned to: Judge Mark Pittman Referred to: Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton Cause: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Date Filed: 05/02/2024 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Nature of Suit: 480 Other Statutes: Consumer Credit Jurisdiction: Federal Question |
Plaintiff | ||
Harriet Nicholson | represented by | Harriet Nicholson 2951 Santa Sabina Drive Grand Prairie, TX 75052 817-217-0245 Email: harrietnicholson@yahoo.com PRO SE |
V. | ||
Defendant | ||
Barrett Daffin Frappier Turner & Engle LLP | represented by | Mark Daniel Hopkins Hopkins LAW PLLC 2802 Flintrock Trace Suite B103 Austin, TX 78738 512-600-4320 Email: mark@hopkinslawtexas.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED |
Defendant | ||
The Bank Of New York Mellon formerly known as The bank of New York as Trustee for the Certificate Holders of CWMBS, Inc, CWMBS Reforming Loan Remic Trust Certificates , Series 2005-R2 |
represented by | Grant Michael Figari McGuireWoods LLP 2601 Olive Street Ste 2100 Dallas, TX 78006 469-372-3939 Email: gfigari@mcguirewoods.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED |
Date Filed | # | Docket Text |
---|---|---|
05/02/2024 | 1 | COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND and Request for Declaratory Judgment against Barrett Daffin Frappier Turner & Engle LLP, The Bank Of New York Mellon filed by Harriet Nicholson. (Filing fee $405; Receipt number 40002999) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: Attorney Information – Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (sre) (Entered: 05/02/2024) |
05/02/2024 | 2 | MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Harriet Nicholson. (sre) (Entered: 05/02/2024) |
05/02/2024 | 3 | Declaration filed by Harriet Nicholson. (sre) (Entered: 05/02/2024) |
05/02/2024 | 4 | Appendix in Support filed by Harriet Nicholson re 1 Complaint. (Attachments: # 1 Additional Page(s), # 2 Additional Page(s)) (sre) (Entered: 05/02/2024) |
05/02/2024 | 5 | New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only – links to the national and circuit indexes.) File to: Judge Means. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (sre) (Entered: 05/02/2024) |
05/02/2024 | 6 | Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (sre) (Entered: 05/02/2024) |
05/03/2024 | 7 | ORDER OF TRANSFER: After review of the docket in this case, and with the transferee judge’s permission, the Court concludes that this case should be, and it is hereby, TRANSFERRED to the docket of Judge Mark Pittman. All future filings shall bear the suffix letter “P” rather than “Y.” (Ordered by Senior Judge Terry R Means on 5/3/2024) (saw) (Entered: 05/03/2024) |
05/03/2024 | 8 | New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate Judge Cureton preliminarily assigned. (For court use only – links to the national index and to the prior sanctions found within the circuit index.) File to: Judge Pittman. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton. (saw) (Entered: 05/03/2024) |
05/03/2024 | 9 | ORDER: Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Complaint (ECF No. 1 ) which contains an Emergency Application for a Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”), and Plaintiff’s Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. 2 ). the Court concludes that the request for a TRO should be, and is hereby, DENIED. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 5/3/2024) (saw) (Entered: 05/03/2024) |
05/03/2024 | 10 | ***STRICKEN and UNFILED per 11 ORDER*** ORDER: Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1 ). The Court concludes that the Complaint is hereby REFERRED to United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cureton for consideration. It is therefore ORDERED that the above-captioned case is reassigned to United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cureton for all further proceedings and the entry of judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1), with any appeal therefrom taken to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(3). (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 5/3/2024) (saw) Modified on 5/3/2024 (mmw). (Entered: 05/03/2024) |
05/03/2024 | 11 | ELECTRONIC ORDER: The Clerk is INSTRUCTED to to STRIKE and UNFILE ECF No. 10. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 5/3/2024) (jaf) (Entered: 05/03/2024) |
05/04/2024 | 12 | NOTICE of CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Harriet Nicholson (Nicholson, Harriet) (Entered: 05/04/2024) |
05/07/2024 | 13 | Request for Clerk to issue SUMMONS filed by Harriet Nicholson. (Attachments: # 1 Additional Page(s) BDFTE SUMMONS REQUEST, # 2 Additional Page(s) BONYM SUMMONS REQUEST) (Nicholson, Harriet) (Entered: 05/07/2024) |
05/07/2024 | 14 | Summons Issued as to Barrett Daffin Frappier Turner & Engle LLP, The Bank Of New York Mellon. (Attachments: # 1 Additional Page(s)) (sre) (Entered: 05/07/2024) |
05/10/2024 | 15 | SUMMONS Returned Executed as to The Bank Of New York Mellon ; served on 5/9/2024. (Nicholson, Harriet) (Entered: 05/10/2024) |
05/14/2024 | 16 | ***STRICKEN AND UNFILED PER 18 *** PLAINTIFF’S MOTION REQUESTING COURT TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE OF COURT RECORD filed by Harriet Nicholson (Nicholson, Harriet) Modified on 5/15/2024 (sre). Modified on 5/22/2024 (sre). (Entered: 05/14/2024) |
05/20/2024 | 17 | ***STRICKEN AND UNFILED PER 19 *** First MOTION for Hearing MOTION FOR SPEEDY HEARING FRCP 57 AND 28 USC 2201 filed by Harriet Nicholson with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Nicholson, Harriet) Modified on 5/22/2024 (sre). (Entered: 05/20/2024) |
05/22/2024 | 18 | ORDER STRIKING AND UNFILING DOCUMENT 16 : Harriet Nicholson must address the following deficiency: The motion must include: certificate of conference or inability to confer. See LR 7.1(b) or LCrR 47.1(b). proposed order. See LR 7.1(c) or LCrR 47.1(c).. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 5/22/2024) (sre) (Entered: 05/22/2024) |
05/22/2024 | 19 | ORDER STRIKING AND UNFILING DOCUMENT 17 : Harriet Nicholson must address the following deficiency: The motion or response must include: certificate of conference or inability to confer. See LR 7.1(b) or LCrR 47.1(b). proposed order. See LR 7.1(c) or LCrR 47.1(c).. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 5/22/2024) (sre) (Entered: 05/22/2024) |
05/22/2024 | 20 | Amended MOTION for Hearing re 19 Order And Notice of Deficiency, MOTION FOR SPEEDY HEARING INCLUDING CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE/INABILITY TO CONFER RESUBMISSION filed by Harriet Nicholson with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR A SPEEDY HEARING) (Nicholson, Harriet) (Entered: 05/22/2024) |
05/22/2024 | 21 | Plaintiff’s AMENDED Motion Requesting The Court to Take Judicial Notice with CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Harriet Nicholson re 18 Order And Notice of Deficiency, 16 MOTION RESUBMISSION DOCUMENT 16 (Attachments: # 1 CERIFICATE OF CONFERENCE, # 2 Proposed Order PROPOSED ORDER) (Nicholson, Harriet) Modified to match document title on 5/23/2024 (sre). Modified event on 5/23/2024 (sre). (Entered: 05/22/2024) |
05/24/2024 | 22 | Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Barrett Daffin Frappier Turner & Engle LLP with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) A, # 2 Exhibit(s) B, # 3 Proposed Order)Attorney Mark Daniel Hopkins added to party Barrett Daffin Frappier Turner & Engle LLP(pty:dft) (Hopkins, Mark) (Entered: 05/24/2024) |
05/29/2024 | 23 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by The Bank Of New York Mellon (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)Attorney Grant Michael Figari added to party The Bank Of New York Mellon(pty:dft) (Figari, Grant) (Entered: 05/29/2024) |
05/29/2024 | 24 | ELECTRONIC ORDER granting 23 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. The Bank Of New York Mellon shall file its answer or other response on or before July 1, 2024. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 5/29/2024) (chmb) (Entered: 05/29/2024) |
PACER Service Center | |||
---|---|---|---|
Transaction Receipt | |||
06/01/2024 10:27:55 |
CIRCLIN’ BACK TO LIT-I-GATE
Dianne Dorman versus Deep Pockets PHH, The Nazi Funding Bank, The Catholic Bandit and The New Lords – Laws In Texas https://t.co/nnB3fqqJ7Y— lawsinusa (@lawsinusa) June 1, 2024
Title: Upholding Justice: The Urgent Need for Judicial Oversight in Tarrant County’s Property Fraud Crisis
MAY 11, 2024 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: JUN 1, 2024
“Back story, I went into the Tarrant County, Texas Clerk’s office to file a Notice of Lis Pendens on Monday, May 6, 2024 and they were initially refusing to file it – although it was compliant with the statute 12.007(b). However, they let White collar criminals electronically file documents through Simplifile without any scrutiny. Notwithstanding, the Simplifile is exclusive for the criminals and a Tarrant County resident is not afforded the opportunity to use the electronic service.” – Harriet Nicholson
In Tarrant County, Texas, the sanctity of homeownership is under siege by a surge in property fraud, facilitated by the exploitation of electronic filing systems. The Tarrant County Clerk rightly acknowledges this alarming trend, echoing the FBI’s designation of property and mortgage fraud as the fastest-growing white-collar crimes. As a resident grappling with the harrowing reality of fraudulent encumbrances on my property, it’s evident that urgent action is needed to safeguard homeowners and restore trust in the system.
For over a decade, I’ve diligently investigated my chain of title, only to uncover a web of deceit orchestrated by white-collar criminals leveraging platforms like Simplifile with impunity. The ease of electronic filing has afforded white collar criminals to prey on unsuspecting homeowners.
The absence of robust judicial oversight compounds the issue, allowing fraudulent documents to slip through the cracks and unjustly strip individuals of their most prized possession – their home. It’s imperative that we bridge this gap by implementing stringent oversight mechanisms to scrutinize filings, detect irregularities, and swiftly intervene to rectify injustices.
Moreover, the exclusive use of Simplifile by these criminals further underscores the need for heightened vigilance and accountability within our county’s clerk office. Collaboration between law enforcement, legal professionals, and community stakeholders is paramount to dismantle these nefarious schemes and restore integrity to our property records.
As I continue to litigate across state lines to protect my home, I implore local authorities to prioritize this pressing issue and take decisive action to stem the tide of property fraud. Every homeowner deserves the assurance that their property rights will be fiercely defended and that justice will prevail against those who seek to exploit the system for personal gain.
Together, let us stand united in our resolve to uphold the sanctity of homeownership and ensure that Tarrant County remains a beacon of justice and integrity for all its residents.
I’ve attached two files showing void Tarrant County, Texas Clerk’s records filed on my property since 2002 without any scrutiny from the Tarrant County, Texas Clerk’s office.
My fight for justice to save my home from the “White Collar Criminals” committing property fraud in the Tarrant County, Texas’ clerk office can be found in the links below.
Texas Homeowner Harriet Nicholson is On the Road Seeking Justice – Laws In New York (lawsinny.com)
Texas Homeowner Harriet Nicholson Seeking Impartial Justice For Over a Decade to Save Her Home from White Collar Criminals– Laws In Texas
![](https://cdn.lawsintexas.com/cb:Eo5i~20d8c/w:auto/h:auto/q:eco/f:best/ig:avif/https://lawsintexas.com/wp-content/wpmowebp/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/LIT-TextLogo-170x50-white-opt.webp)