Acceleration

Why Pay for Lifetime Federal Judge’s ‘Protection’ When They Are Lyin’, Cheatin’ and Stealin’ from Citizens?

Judiciary leaders are expressing deep concern that Congress has failed to provide funding to protect federal judges. LIT says don’t fund ’em.

Judiciary Renews Calls for Security Funding

AUG 16, 2021 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: AUG 16, 2021

Aside from the Judicial Corruption, there is so much waste in Federal Courts. They could pay for their own security if they released all the Senior Judges into permanent retirement. We’re funding an old folks home when you look at the ages of these judges. They are too old to be on the bench. Just take a look at the Fifth Circuit. They have appx. as many senior judges as active judges. The total number of judges they have now was the same amount (27) when the Fifth Circuit was split and the Eleventh Circuit created. So remove the old judges (seniors) and you’re on the way to fixing your own budget and you’ll have a more efficient court, we suggest.

Judiciary leaders are expressing deep concern that Congress has failed to provide funding to protect federal judges and courthouses, and are urging House and Senate leaders to appropriate money to address a “worsening” safety environment.

“We look to you to help address those needs and promote our mutual goal of a safe, effective Judiciary,” said Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf, secretary of the Judicial Conference of the United States, and Judge John W. Lungstrum, chair of the Conference’s Budget Committee, in an Aug. 11 letter (pdf).

“The number of security incidents are increasing and the threat environment is worsening,” they said. “The continued existence of these threats and vulnerabilities poses serious risks not just to specific judges, court personnel, or facilities, but also to the effective administration of justice in this country.”

Mauskopf and Lungstrum cited a decision to remove $182.5 million in judicial security funding from the Emergency Security Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2021, a law recently passed in response to the Jan. 6 Capitol attacks and for other purposes. The judicial security funding was included in earlier iterations of the bill, but was dropped from the final bill. The letter called that decision “deeply concerning.”

SEN. CHARLES SCHUMER & THE FINANCIAL CRISIS 2008

The Judiciary has pushed for additional security funding since July 2020, when the son of U.S. District Judge Esther Salas was murdered, and her husband was gravely wounded, by a disgruntled litigant who came to their New Jersey home posing as a delivery courier. During public disturbances last year, more than 50 courthouses were damaged, and two security employees were shot near courthouses, one fatally.

“The Judiciary began sounding the alarm about critical security vulnerabilities over a year ago,”

they wrote.

“A comprehensive approach is required to effectively address the growing violence and threats facing the Judiciary. Our constitutional system depends on judges who can make decisions without fear of reprisal or retribution.”

The letter was sent to the House and Senate leadership, and to leaders of the House and Senate Appropriations Committee (pdf).

It noted that the Judiciary’s $1.54 billion infrastructure request seeks $389.5 million in judicial and courthouse security spending, if Congress approves additional infrastructure funding through the budget reconciliation process.

That security request includes:

$112.5 million to harden courthouses to withstand a hostile incursion;

$10 million for a new security vulnerability program to proactively manage security vulnerabilities at the national, circuit, and district level;

and

$267 million as a direct appropriation to the Federal Protective Service to upgrade aging perimeter security cameras at federal courthouses and other court facilities.

The Senate Judiciary Committee’s Waste, Fraud and Nepotism Investigation of US Marshals. Texas Tops the Charts

The report shows that no matter which Gov. Dept, Fraud and Corruption will happen. Judges are no different and This Bill Should be Rejected.

Judge’s Verbal Terroristic Threats End in Criminal Arrest in Georgia

Ain’t it sad that the Federal Judiciary in Texas is even corrupt when it comes to false threats of violence targeted at elders….

Why Should We Pay for Federal Judges Enhanced Security and Stacking the Courts with More Corrupt Outlaws in Robes?

The federal judiciary seeks $8.1 Billion dollars for the 2022 fiscal year, an increased request of funds at just under 5% over the prior year. It should be rejected.

Why Pay for Lifetime Federal Judge’s ‘Protection’ When They Are Lyin’, Cheatin’ and Stealin’ from Citizens?
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Laws In Texas is a blog about the Financial Crisis and how the banks and government are colluding against the citizens and homeowners of the State of Texas and relying on a system of #FakeDocs and post-crisis legal precedents, specially created by the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to foreclose on homeowners around this great State. We are not lawyers. We do not offer legal advice. We are citizens of the State of Texas who have spent a decade in the court system in Texas and have been party to during this period to the good, the bad and the very ugly.

Donate to LawsInTexas. Make a Difference.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

We keep your data private and share your data only with third parties that make this service possible. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

© 2020-21 LawInTexas com is an online trading name which is wholly owned by Blogger Inc., a nonprofit 501(c)(3) registered in Delaware. | All Rights Reserved.

To Top