LITX
DEC 28, 2024
ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that due to event of default on the Note, Plaintiff, or its successors or assigns, may enforce its Security Instrument against the Property through non-judicial foreclosure of the Property – Judge David Hittner, signed 22nd day of January, 2021. https://t.co/kEGIujhuei pic.twitter.com/WcislZbVSb
— lawsinusa (@lawsinusa) December 28, 2024
LIT COMMENTARY
FEB 14, 2024
On Friday, Feb. 9, 2024, LIT released a tweet which states; Coming up on LIT: Shocking facts and case studies on the current criminal activity endorsed by the US Gov for implementation by Federal Judges and Wall Street’s Creditor Rights lawyers. Truth that will shake American homeowners to the core. Stay tuned. #TruthRevealed #USJustice
This published foreclosure case is part of the live reporting and investigation, which is explained, in part, below:
LIT’s inquiry delves into the prevailing standards governing foreclosures, Temporary Restraining Orders (TROs), Injunctions, evictions, and appeals. Drawing from rigorous analysis of factual case studies and a wealth of data amassed over years of investigation, LIT’s insights are prominently featured on this legal blog, LawsInTexas.com.
The initial confusion stemming from the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, wherein the US Government, hand in hand with the judiciary, orchestrated the mass seizure of millions of homes, is a focal point of LIT’s examination.
LIT refrains from extensively elaborating on the myriad frauds that transpired initially, such as lender application fraud and predatory lending which resulted in the financial crisis, and thus leading to counterfeit assignments, robo-signing, document falsification, perjury, and the unlawful actions of the Mortgage Electronic Registration System (MERS) in foreclosing on homesteads.
Instead, LIT steers the discussion toward the avarice evident within the legal profession and the complicit role of the judiciary in perpetuating fraud in real estate and title deed matters, beyond the scandals within their own administration.
LIT’s live reporting and investigation is published in real-time, as it probes into the motivations driving the US Government’s directive for the judiciary to adopt predatory practices in the latter part of 2023 and throughout 2024—an inquiry to which LIT claims to hold the key answers.
The Controlling Question: Why Are the Feds and Texas Targeting an 85-Year Old Disabled Widow for an Illegal Foreclosure c/o The Catholic Bandit When He Cannot Execute His Own Orders of Foreclosure from Years Past?
In the ongoing saga of foreclosure proceedings for the Garcia’s, Judge David Hittner entered a default judgment of foreclosure on Jan. 22, 2021 there’s no sign of foreclosure, with judgment in hand, for the last 3 years. The Garcia’s are still residing in the home subject to foreclosure and Mackie Wolf’s Catholic Bandit Mark Cronenwett has blanked the order of foreclosure for the last 37 months.
Instead, they are focusing on Joanna Burke, LIT’s founder’s mother in order to silence LIT and/or send her to an early grave due to the unrelenting abuse of power they are invoking. Targeting an elderly widow is the lowest of the low tactic.
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Garcia Romero
JUDGMENT; JAN 22, 2021 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: FEB 4, 2021
II.
In light of the Defendant’s default and the nature of Plaintiffs claims, the Court orders as follows:
It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the material allegations of the Complaint be and are deemed admitted as to Defendant Lionel Garcia Romero.
It is further, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that an event of default has occurred on that certain Texas Home Equity Note (Cash Out – Fixed Rate – First Lien), executed on or about January 24, 2005 by Hilda Garcia and Lionel Garcia Romero, in the principal amount of $92,000.00 and payable to Argent Mortgage Company, LLC (hereinafter “Note”), bearing interest at the rate of 8.9000% per annum.
It is further, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that that certain Texas Home Equity Security Instrument (First Lien) dated January 24, 2005, signed by Hilda Garcia and Lionel Garcia Romero, and recorded in the official public records of Harris County, Texas, as Document No. Y243935 on February 7, 2005 (hereafter “Security Instrument”), provides Plaintiff, as the mortgagee of the Security Instrument, in the event of a default on the obligations on the Note, with a first lien security interest on that certain real property commonly known as 718 Saint Edwards Green, Houston, Texas 77015, and more particularly described as follows:
LOT 84, IN BLOCK 1, OF RIVIERA EAST, SECTION 4, AN ADDITION IN HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 294, PAGE 68 OF THE MAP RECORDS OF HARRIS COUNTY,
TEXAS. (The “Property”).
It is further, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff is the mortgagee of the Security Instrument.
ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the following are secured by the Security Instrument on the Property: the outstanding balance of the Note, including attorney’s fees; pre-judgment interest; post-judgment interest; and costs of court. It is further,
ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that due to event of default on the Note, Plaintiff, or its successors or assigns, may enforce its Security Instrument against the Property through non-judicial foreclosure of the Property as provided in the Security Instrument and Texas Property Code § 51.002.
It is further, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that, should Plaintiff proceed with foreclosure on the Property then, the purchaser at the foreclosure sale will be vested with all of Defendant’s interest, rights, and title in the Property.
It is further, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff may further communicate with Defendant, and all third parties reasonably necessary to conduct the foreclosure sale.
It is further, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that all costs are to be taxed against the Defendant.
It is further, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff is awarded attorney’s fees in the amount of $4,296.77 and costs, to be determined by subsequent motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(2)(B)(i).
Attorney’s fees are awarded as a as an additional debt secured by the Security Instrument.
It is further, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that this is a final judgment and any relief not awarded herein is DENIED.
Signed this 22nd day of January, 2021
DAVID HITTNER
[Senior and Unconstitutional]
United States District Judge
Homeowner Strikes Back: Counters Wolves Predatory Legal Scheme to Protract Litigation Until Death
Discover Josef Lamell’s battle against predatory legal tactics: at age 74, he stands against a scheme which has seen many meet untimely ends.
Foreclosure Wolf Mark Cronenwett for US Bank Takes a Bite at Lamell’s Time Expired Argument
This is a state case not a federal case as the PNC v. Howard Supreme Court decision affirmed. It has no place being decided relying upon erie.
US District Judge David Hittner, S.D. Texas, Houston Division
US District Judge David Hittner, S.D. Texas, Houston Division
