Federal Law

Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v. Lionel Garcia Romero, S.D. Tex: Senior Judge David Hittner

Senior Judge David Hittner enters default judgment in favor of Wells Fargo on real property at 718 Saint Edwards Green, Houston, Texas 77015.

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Garcia Romero

JUDGMENT; JAN 22, 2021 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: FEB 4, 2021

II.

In light of the Defendant’s default and the nature of Plaintiffs claims, the Court orders as follows:

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the material allegations of the Complaint be and are deemed admitted as to Defendant Lionel Garcia Romero.

It is further, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that an event of default has occurred on that certain Texas Home Equity Note (Cash Out Fixed Rate First Lien), executed on or about  January 24, 2005 by Hilda Garcia and Lionel Garcia Romero, in the principal amount of $92,000.00 and payable to Argent Mortgage Company, LLC (hereinafter “Note”), bearing interest at the rate of 8.9000% per annum.

It is further, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that that certain Texas Home Equity Security Instrument (First Lien) dated January 24, 2005, signed by Hilda Garcia and Lionel Garcia Romero, and recorded in the official public records of Harris County, Texas, as Document No. Y243935 on February 7, 2005 (hereafter “Security Instrument”), provides Plaintiff, as the mortgagee of the Security Instrument, in the event of a default on the obligations on the Note, with a first lien security interest on that certain real property commonly known as 718 Saint Edwards Green, Houston, Texas 77015, and more particularly described as follows:

LOT 84, IN BLOCK 1, OF RIVIERA EAST, SECTION 4, AN ADDITION IN HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 294, PAGE 68 OF THE MAP RECORDS OF HARRIS COUNTY,

TEXAS. (The “Property”).

It is further, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff is the mortgagee of the Security Instrument.

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the following are secured by the Security Instrument on the Property: the outstanding balance of the Note, including attorney’s fees; pre-judgment interest; post-judgment interest; and costs of court. It is further,

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that due to event of default on the Note, Plaintiff, or its successors or assigns, may enforce its Security Instrument against the Property through non-judicial foreclosure of the Property as provided in the Security Instrument and Texas Property Code § 51.002.

It is further, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that, should Plaintiff proceed with foreclosure on the Property then, the purchaser at the foreclosure sale will be vested with all of Defendant’s interest, rights, and title in the Property.

It is further, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff may further communicate with Defendant, and all third parties reasonably necessary to conduct the foreclosure sale.

It is further, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that all costs are to be taxed against the Defendant.

It is further, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff is awarded attorney’s fees in the amount of $4,296.77 and costs, to be determined by subsequent motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(2)(B)(i).

Attorney’s fees are awarded as a as an additional debt secured by the Security Instrument.

It is further, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that this is a final judgment and any relief not awarded herein is DENIED.

Signed this 22nd day of January, 2021

DAVID HITTNER
[Senior and Unconstitutional]
United States District Judge

Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas v. Mousavi, Commercial Loan Foreclosure Case before Judge Hittner

The unprecedented, global COVID-19 pandemic has had a devastating impact on the hospitality industry. Borrower owns and operates a hotel in Katy, Texas , which serves as collateral for the loan at issue.

Kafi, Inc. v. Deutsche Bank, Before Judge Hittner, Should Be Remanded and Not in Discovery

The evidence strongly suggests Deutsche Bank is not a citizen of Germany. Business activities of national banks are controlled by the National Bank Act. Hittner has abused his power by not remanding on a timely basis.

The Chasin’ a Baby FDCPA Case, Assigned to Judges Hittner and Bray, S.D. Texas

Plaintiff informed Paramount that “Hunter King” was unknown to her. Plaintiff informed Paramount that her son’s name was Hunter but he was born in 2017.

Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v. Lionel Garcia Romero, S.D. Tex: Senior Judge David Hittner
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Laws In Texas is a blog about the Financial Crisis and how the banks and government are colluding against the citizens and homeowners of the State of Texas and relying on a system of #FakeDocs and post-crisis legal precedents, specially created by the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to foreclose on homeowners around this great State. We are not lawyers. We do not offer legal advice. We are citizens of the State of Texas who have spent a decade in the court system in Texas and have been party to during this period to the good, the bad and the very ugly.

Donate to LawsInTexas. Make a Difference.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

We keep your data private and share your data only with third parties that make this service possible. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

© 2020-21 LawInTexas com is an online trading name which is wholly owned by Blogger Inc., a nonprofit 501(c)(3) registered in Delaware. | All Rights Reserved.

To Top