Burke v PHH Ocwen, Hopkins Law, PLLC, Mark Hopkins and Shelley Hopkins before Bent Judge Al Bennett, SDTX, Houston.
Self-dealing caused Judge Bennett to enter judgment against Plaintiffs and equity will not enforce judgments procured by fraud.
Unlike the majority of Vilt's similar cases, this fraudulent conveyance comes with a copy of the Special Warranty Deed.
The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Bank and against Pittards. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. That was in...
Non prisoner Lamell obtains a partial reversal in his favor from a 3-panel which capitulated from their earlier opinion. LIT investigates why.
Case 1: Dismissed with Prejudice. Case 2: Never concluded. Case 3 is back, with lawyer Clay Vilt reappearing and dismissing with prejudice.
A 3-Panel consisting of familiar Judges Charles Wilson, Kevin Newsom and R Lanier Anderson defies logic and the law in this perverted...
LIT highlighted Davis in March of 2021 in a 5th Circuit case before Owen, Chief Judge, and Graves and Ho, Circuit Judge....
The significant and distressing difference is the Burkes battle is not just with the opposing parties, but with the judicial machinery itself.
This is the Pro Se's ninth lawsuit involving the foreclosure of the Property and third lawsuit against the Attorney Defendant Barrett Daffin.
Chief Judge Lee Rosenthal denied label of 'Vexatious Litigant' with at least 9 foreclosure filings spanning 18 years, including 6 since 2017.
In this foreclosure appeal, the court sua sponte includes arguments of res judicata not brought up at the lower court and returns...
Illinois: The “single-refiling rule,” which prohibits actions that have been voluntarily dismissed from being refiled more than once.
The scope of judicial immunity in the Eleventh Circuit is now made clear. Judicial immunity is complete, unqualified, and without exception.
Ocwens' Consent Judgment had two sets of obligations: complying with federal and state law, and complying with the fencing-in provisions.
Even under a traditional res judicata approach, Marra appropriately considered the terms of the Consent Judgment. CFPB’s claims are barred.
Judge Marra's analysis of the res judicata effect of the Consent Judgment using traditional principles shows that method is inappropriate.
Texas Second Court of Appeals has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there was error in the...