See Mendoza v. Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC before Federal District Judge Ricardo H Hinojosa, U.S. District Court in McAllen, Texas.
Bank of America Fraud Protection taken to task in this now removed lawsuit, to be heard before Judge Sim Lake, SDTX, Houston...
LIT compares the two lower court GA judge opinions, which cite the appeals court (11th Cir.) intervenor opinion in Burke v Ocwen...
There's another couple of lawyers in Texas operating without a State Issued Bond and License, Mark and Shelley Hopkins of Hopkins Law,...
BBB Review: We called to try and have a collection removed from our account in exchange for payment. This charge was an...
The CFPB took action against this reverse mortgage company for deceptive ads, claiming that consumers could not lose their homes.
At the initial conference, Judge Edison confirmed that discovery should generally not be stayed pending a ruling on a motion to dismiss.
Perhaps that is why the subsidiary of Cenlar Capital Corporation continues to associate with another negative, BDF Hopkins of Texas.
At the time of the filing of this Complaint, consumers, nationally, have lodged over Six-Thousand (6,000) complaints with the watchdog CFPB.
There's not a single lawyer in government who has to abide by a non-compete agreement. Think about that for a minute, or...
AG Merrick Garland announced he would stop redlining. LIT told him the first case should be this one in Illinois. Here's what...
Here's a perfect example of going on the offensive with false accusations and frivolous lawsuits. Are you reading Shelley Hopkins and DOJ?
This court makes a confident Erie guess that the Texas Supreme Court would have concluded that explicit substitution was not required.
We do not believe that Naimoli needs to make an additional showing of damages to survive summary judgment on her § 1024.35...
Douglas engaged in the highly unusual transfer of a personally significant asset—his $1.6 million residence—to two insiders for a dollar.
The revolving door is where an individual moves back and forth between a govt regulator and serving the interests of regulated entities.
The significant and distressing difference is the Burkes battle is not just with the opposing parties, but with the judicial machinery itself.
The Bankers found guilty of loan fraud by altering loan payment histories, renaming businesses, and hiding prior defaults by borrowers.