Sydnor v PHH Mortgage Corporation is Another Harassment Complaint

Post-Discharge 12 Yrs Ago and After the First Lawsuit Settled, PHH and OCWEN Continue Making Harassing and Coercive Contacts with Plaintiff.

Sydnor v. PHH Mortgage Corporation
District Court, N.D. Texas

JAN 5, 2021 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: JUL 20, 2021

As LIT also published today, in the case of Geiser v. PHH Mortgage Corp., this is irrefutable evidence that the accounting and mortgage servicing ‘proprietary’ software system(s) in place at PHH Ocwen are shambolic.

The Consent Orders and Decrees put in place against these rogue mortgage servicers with nearly every State in the country are being violated daily and without penalty.

Lender Application Fraud: Homeowners Pay The Price Due to Judicial Corruption and Gov. Interference.

U.S. Attorney’s and investigative partners across the country are selectively committed to holding lenders accountable for liar loans.

CFPB Respond to PHH Ocwen’s Claims

Ocwens’ Consent Judgment had two sets of obligations: complying with federal and state law, and complying with the fencing-in provisions.

Ocwen Respond to CFPB’s Arguments at the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Even under a traditional res judicata approach, Marra appropriately considered the terms of the Consent Judgment. CFPB’s claims are barred.

U.S. District Court
Northern District of Texas (Fort Worth)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 4:21-cv-00003-P

Sydnor v. PHH Mortgage Corporation
Assigned to: Judge Mark Pittman
Cause: 28:1331 Fed. Question
Date Filed: 01/05/2021
Date Terminated: 05/24/2021
Jury Demand: Plaintiff
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions
Jurisdiction: Federal Question


Date Filed # Docket Text
05/05/2021 16 NOTICE of Settlement of Claims filed by Carol Diane Sydnor (Manchee, James) (Entered: 05/05/2021)
05/06/2021 17 ORDER: The Court has been notified that this case has settled. See ECF No. 16 . Therefore, the Court ORDERS that all deadlines are STAYED until further ordered by the Court. The parties shall file appropriate dismissal papers – a stipulation of dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) or an appropriate motion and corresponding proposed order – with the Clerk’s Office on or before May 31, 2021. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 5/6/2021) (pef) (Entered: 05/06/2021)
05/24/2021 18 Joint STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL With Prejudice re 17 Order Setting Deadline/Hearing, by Carol Diane Sydnor. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Manchee, James) (Entered: 05/24/2021)
Sydnor v PHH Mortgage Corporation is Another Harassment Complaint
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To Top