Sydnor v. PHH Mortgage Corporation
(4:21-cv-00003)
District Court, N.D. Texas
JAN 5, 2021 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: JUL 20, 2021
As LIT also published today, in the case of Geiser v. PHH Mortgage Corp., this is irrefutable evidence that the accounting and mortgage servicing ‘proprietary’ software system(s) in place at PHH Ocwen are shambolic.
The Consent Orders and Decrees put in place against these rogue mortgage servicers with nearly every State in the country are being violated daily and without penalty.
Lender Application Fraud: Homeowners Pay The Price Due to Judicial Corruption and Gov. Interference.
U.S. Attorney’s and investigative partners across the country are selectively committed to holding lenders accountable for liar loans.
CFPB Respond to PHH Ocwen’s Claims
Ocwens’ Consent Judgment had two sets of obligations: complying with federal and state law, and complying with the fencing-in provisions.
Ocwen Respond to CFPB’s Arguments at the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Even under a traditional res judicata approach, Marra appropriately considered the terms of the Consent Judgment. CFPB’s claims are barred.
U.S. District Court
Northern District of Texas (Fort Worth)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 4:21-cv-00003-P
| Sydnor v. PHH Mortgage Corporation Assigned to: Judge Mark Pittman Cause: 28:1331 Fed. Question |
Date Filed: 01/05/2021 Date Terminated: 05/24/2021 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions Jurisdiction: Federal Question |
| Date Filed | # | Docket Text |
|---|---|---|
| 05/05/2021 | 16 | NOTICE of Settlement of Claims filed by Carol Diane Sydnor (Manchee, James) (Entered: 05/05/2021) |
| 05/06/2021 | 17 | ORDER: The Court has been notified that this case has settled. See ECF No. 16 . Therefore, the Court ORDERS that all deadlines are STAYED until further ordered by the Court. The parties shall file appropriate dismissal papers – a stipulation of dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) or an appropriate motion and corresponding proposed order – with the Clerk’s Office on or before May 31, 2021. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 5/6/2021) (pef) (Entered: 05/06/2021) |
| 05/24/2021 | 18 | Joint STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL With Prejudice re 17 Order Setting Deadline/Hearing, by Carol Diane Sydnor. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Manchee, James) (Entered: 05/24/2021) |
