Fairness in Federal Judiciary's Service and Remand Orders Questioned as Eighth Circuit Asserts Robber's Rights Trump Elderly Citizen's Needs.
It is well settled that federal courts should avoid a statutory interpretation that creates constitutional issues.
We do not believe that Naimoli needs to make an additional showing of damages to survive summary judgment on her § 1024.35...
The Panel does not mention the fact that Judges HIgginbotham and Stewart were on the panel for the 2017 appeal against Wells...
Fifth Circuit Clerk Gardner, with knowledge and in bad faith, entered her own fraudulent Motion upon which the 5th Cir. entered its...
The Burkes now have proof beyond a reasonable doubt of Elder Abuse in Texas Federal Courts. It's now a valid Criminal Complaint.
The Burkes file a motion to strike Hopkins Law's response as the motion they are objecting to is void ab initio. It...
The Pot Calling the Kettle Black; Austin Creditor Rights Lawyers Mark and Shelley Hopkins of Hopkins Law impetuously project their hypocrisy.
Oath of office of clerks and deputies; In part: “…and will faithfully and impartially discharge all other duties of my office according...
Will this Court follow their own opinions and rules and sanction Hopkins? And refer Mark Hopkins and Shelley Hopkins to State Bar...
The 5th Circuit denied the Burkes request to exclude the Statement of Facts from their petition but now they have had a...
Fifth Circuit have uploaded the May 17, 2021 document as “proposed sufficient petition for rehearing en banc” to the April 13, 2021...
FHFA is not acting as the gov't when it foreclosed on the plaintiffs’ mortgages and was not subject to their Fifth Amendment...
What’s interesting here is Stanley Price complained about lower court Judge Vance, who was succeeded, albeit temporarily, by Judge Engelhardt who sat...
As William Erbey's $3 billion dollar admonished Ocwen prey on the American Homeowner after the 2008 Financial Crisis, the executioners, the Judiciary...
The court concluded it was an unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system’s ability impartially to adjudicate this matter by...
The failure to consider objective standards requiring judicial recusal is not consistent with the imperatives of due process.
The Government’s burden to prove falsity in the face of an ambiguous reporting requirement is a matter of first impression in this...