LIT compares the two lower court GA judge opinions, which cite the appeals court (11th Cir.) intervenor opinion in Burke v Ocwen...
The Burkes fight for democracy and honest judges is not insular, and like the current Ukraine-Russian war, it affects millions of citizens.
The answer to that question is easy. The 11th Circuit is biased and are protective of their own ochlocracy, rather than the...
The Response is electronically signed by Alexandra L. Tifford on her own behalf and on behalf of Christopher E. Knight and Michael...
A 3-Panel consisting of familiar Judges Charles Wilson, Kevin Newsom and R Lanier Anderson defies logic and the law in this perverted...
When the younger generation is baulking a 5 day work week, Goodwin Law is touting vacations for associates prepared to overbill clients.
The corrupt lawyer receives 15 years instead of the mandatory life sentence and the Deutsche Bag, errr, banker gets to walk...read on.
Why? Because it's big money. There is no mention of Albright calling a foreclosure mill to ask them to submit an affidavit...
If the debtor in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy moves to dismiss his case, "the court shall dismiss" it. 11 U.S.C. § 1307(b)
LIT's had this data for years but thanks to the much larger media outlets like Reuters and Wall Street Journal who have...
The Court finds that it should award Plaintiffs $1,000.00 in statutory damages, $9,000 in punitive damages, attorney fees and expenses.
Open Courts: "The legitimacy and integrity of a court’s action depend on the public’s ability to scrutinize the basis for that action."
Goodwin have avoided all the main arguments raised by the pro se Burkes because they have no legal answer, so instead they...
Albright Slap Down: "Austin remains the more convenient forum...the district court’s decision amounts to a clear abuse of discretion.
Who is Texas tycoon and physician James Leininger and what's his relationship to the Judiciary and Fifth Ciruit Chief Judge Owen?
The scope of judicial immunity in the Eleventh Circuit is now made clear. Judicial immunity is complete, unqualified, and without exception.
Ocwens' Consent Judgment had two sets of obligations: complying with federal and state law, and complying with the fencing-in provisions.
Even under a traditional res judicata approach, Marra appropriately considered the terms of the Consent Judgment. CFPB’s claims are barred.