Res judicata, bars the litigation of claims that either have been litigated or should have been raised in an earlier suit.
Mark Cronenwett, the foreclosure mill lawyer from Mackie Wolf, who is on auto-dial from federal courts to file attorney fees, returns again.
Interestingly, Justice Brunner is a concurring opinion, yet as you will see in the videos presented by LIT, she claimed to be...
Dismissals for lack of jurisdiction are generally without prejudice. Not in this case sayeth the Fifth Circuit panel reviewing de novo.
Greedy Attorney Bruce Matson was sentenced to 44 months in federal prison related to his theft of $4 million of bankruptcy trust...
LIT's now following Debra Innocenti-Placette as she returns to Federal Court armed with a new foreclosure defense attorney.
Jorge Tello v. PennyMac Loan Services ends quickly after removal from state to federal court. Locke Lord representing PennyMac.
Eligible candidates could receive up to approximately $3.4 million in public matching funds based on qualifying contributions.
After the 'bench retirement' of Judge David Evans, this zoom conference is now being held in another court, the 192nd in Texas.
The significant and distressing difference is the Burkes battle is not just with the opposing parties, but with the judicial machinery itself.
The end of Clerkships: If this proposal were to gain momentum, the lower courts should be mandated to implement this new precedent.
At this early stage of litigation, the court finds that the documentary proof and the facts alleged by Veritas are sufficient.
When the Supreme Court allows a lower court to go rogue, it is going rogue itself says Pulitzer Prize Winning Journalist Linda...
Political influence and a load of illegal gotten gains (dosh) can get you a very light slap on the wrist in a...
The Bankers found guilty of loan fraud by altering loan payment histories, renaming businesses, and hiding prior defaults by borrowers.
What is a motion for judgment on the pleadings and why are they disfavored by federal court judges? Answer: Because most are...
Lawyers with the U.S. Justice Department and for the plaintiffs said the settlement still needs to be finalized and that's a secret.
Contrary to the Court of Appeals' position, the Amendment protects seizures even though no search within its meaning has taken place.