Appellate Circuit

Shhh, Our ‘Tentative’ PACER Fees Settlement is Private and Confidential

Lawyers with the U.S. Justice Department and for the plaintiffs said the settlement still needs to be finalized and that’s a secret.

U.S. reaches tentative settlement in excessive PACER fees lawsuit

NOV 16, 2021 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: NOV 17, 2021

The U.S. government has agreed in principle to resolve a class action lawsuit brought by a group of nonprofits alleging the federal judiciary overcharged the public for access to court documents through its PACER system.

The tentative settlement was disclosed in a status report filed in federal court in Washington, D.C., on Monday, more than a year after an appellate court concluded the judiciary improperly covered some of its expenses with PACER fees.

Terms of the potential deal were not disclosed. Lawyers with the U.S. Justice Department and for the plaintiffs said the deal still needs to be finalized and that they hoped to provide an update by Jan. 20.

William Narwold of Motley Rice, who represents the nonprofits with Deepak Gupta of Gupta Wessler, declined to comment, saying the agreement remains confidential.

Representatives for the Justice Department and the Administrative Office of U.S. Courts did not respond to requests for comment.

In a 2016 lawsuit, three national nonprofit organizations — the National Veterans Legal Services Program, the National Consumer Law Center and Alliance for Justice — alleged that PACER fees charged between 2010 and 2016 were excessive.

PACER, which stands for Public Access to Court Electronic Records, is run by the Judicial Conference of the United States. Users pay $0.10 per page with a cap of $3 per document (with transcripts excluded).

The lawsuit was brought as a class action on behalf of anyone who paid PACER fees from April 2010 to April 2016. The judiciary collected $923 million in PACER fees during the fiscal years 2010 to 2016, according to court filings.

U.S. District Judge Ellen Huvelle in 2018 rejected some of the plaintiffs’ claims while also holding that some of the judiciary’s expenditures went beyond what Congress had authorized.

That included spending $192 million in PACER system fees on court technology projects, the judge said. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld her decision in August 2020.

The case is National Veterans Legal Services Program v. United States, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, No. 16-cv-745.

For the plaintiffs: William Narwold, Meghan Oliver and Elizabeth Smith of Motley Rice; and Deepak Gupta and Jonathan Taylor of Gupta Wessler

The Most Dangerous Branch of Government Tells Congress To Chill on Providing Free Public Access to PACER

The Judiciary Bullies Congress: The legislation would create a substantial risk to litigants’ access to justice by raising filing fees.

Federal Courts and Abuse of Protective Orders to Deny Transparency and Media Oversight

LIT has noted a recent surge in protective orders in foreclosure cases by a former financial crisis 2008 lawyer, now Texas federal judge.

Two Senators Criticize Texas Federal Judge Alan Albright’s Control over Patent Cases

Why? Because it’s big money. There is no mention of Albright calling a foreclosure mill to ask them to submit an affidavit for attorney fees.

Shhh, Our ‘Tentative’ PACER Fees Settlement is Private and Confidential
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Laws In Texas first started as an independent investigative blog about the Financial Crisis and how the Banks and Government are colluding against the citizens and homeowners of the State of Texas, relying upon a system of #FakeDocs and post-crisis legal precedents, specially created by the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to foreclose on homeowners around this great State. We are not lawyers. We do not offer legal advice. That stated, LIT's Blog has grown tremendously during the three or so years it has been operating and our reach is now nationwide as we expand via our micro-blogs in various states. Join us as we strive to bring back justice and honor to our Judiciary and Government employees, paid for by Citizens.

Donate to LawsInTexas. Make a Difference.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

We keep your data private and share your data only with third parties that make this service possible. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

© 2020-2023 LawInTexas com is an online trading name which is wholly owned by Blogger Inc., a nonprofit 501(c)(3) registered in Delaware. | All Rights Reserved.

To Top