Appellate Circuit

Expedited Foreclosure Lawsuit No. 4 filed by DBNTCO and SPS aka Select Portfolio Servicing v Anthony

Deutsche Bank files for expedited foreclosure as trustee in lawsuit filed in Harris County District Court with SPS affidavit in support.

 2024-21712 –

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE, vs. ANTHONY, CAROL R (A/K/A CAROL RENEE ANTHONY) 

(Court 190, JUDGE BEAU MILLER)

APR 16, 2024 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: APR 29, 2024
APR 29, MAY 15 30, 2024

Above is the date LIT Last updated this article.

ANSWER AND RESPONSE TO PETITIONER’S APPLICATION FOR AN  EXPEDITED ORDER OF FORECLOSURE

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:

COMES NOW, Respondent CAROL R. ANTHONY (“Respondent”), by and through her attorney, and files this Response to Petitioner’s Application for an Expedited Foreclosure in the above styled and numbered cause. Respondent would respectfully show the Court the following:

I.                     General Denial and Defenses

1.                  Respondent admits she is an owner of the property that is the subject of this suit, which is her homestead.

2.                  Pursuant to Tex. R. Civ. P. 736.5(c), Respondent generally denies each and every allegation in the Petition filed by Plaintiff and demands that Plaintiff provide strict proof thereof.

3.                  Without waiving the foregoing general denial, Respondent files this response pursuant to Tex R. Civ. P. 736.5(c)(2) and asserts numerous defenses under Texas Constitution Article XVI § 50(a)(6). Pursuant to Tex. R. Civ. P. 736.6, Respondent demands that Petitioner prove by affidavits on file, or evidence presented, the grounds for granting the order sought in the

application, including evidence to overcome Respondent’s affirmative defenses plead under Texas Constitution Article XVI § 50(a)(6).

3.    The claims asserted against Defendant are barred in whole, because Plaintiff violated Texas Constitution Article XVI, § 50(a)(6) on its face. As such, the subject lien and security agreement are void.

4.    The claims asserted against Defendant are barred in whole or in part by the doctrine of illegality.

5.    Plaintiff failed to provide all notices required under the Deed of Trust and State law.

6.    The claims asserted against Respondent are barred in whole or in part by the doctrine of estoppel.

7.    Respondent raises all defenses provided in Tex R. Civ. P. 736.5(c).

II.                 Prayer

WHEREFORE, premises considered, Respondent prays this Court deny Petitioner’s Application for an Expedited Order of Foreclosure. Respondent further prays that this Court grant her all relief at law and in equity to which she may be entitled.

Respectfully submitted,

LONE STAR LEGAL AID

/s/ Andrew Moore

ANDREW MOORE
State Bar No: 24105428
E-Mail: amoore@lonestarlegal.org

Lone Star Legal Aid
Military & Veterans Unit
2929 McKinney
Houston, Texas 77003
Ph. (844) 400-8387;
Fax: (713) 652-4063

Attorney for Respondent Carol Anthony

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served pursuant to Rules 21 and 21a of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, by facsimile, e-mail, certified mail, return receipt requested and/or first-class mail, on this the 23rd day of May 2024 to:

Ronny George
13105 Northwest Freeway, Suite 960
Houston, TX 77040
Via E-service: TXHomeEquity@logs.com
ATTORNEY FOR APPLICANT

/s/ Andrew Moore
Andrew Moore

Attorney for Respondent, Carol Anthony

Answer and Response to Petitioner’s Application for an Expedited Order of Foreclosure

 2024-21712 –

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE, vs. ANTHONY, CAROL R (A/K/A CAROL RENEE ANTHONY) 

(Court 189, OUTLAW TAMI CRAFT aka TAMIKA CRAFT-DEMMING)

APR 5, 2024 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: APR 10, 2024
APR 10, 2024

Above is the date LIT Last updated this article.

“At least 152 (appx 13 years) payments have not been made” claims Deutsche Bank.

Case (Cause) Number Style File Date Court Case Region Type Of Action / Offense
202421712- 7
Active – Civil
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY AS TRUSTEE IN vs. ANTHONY, CAROL R (A/K/A CAROL RENEE ANTHONY) 4/5/2024 189 Civil Foreclosure – Home Equity-Expedited
202332483- 7
Disposed (Final)
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY AS TRUSTEE IN TRUST FOR vs.
ANTHONY, CAROL R (AKA CAROL RENEE ANTHONY)
5/24/2023 190 Civil Foreclosure – Home Equity-Expedited
202214572- 7
Disposed (Final)
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY AS TRUSTEE IN TRUST FOR vs. ANTHONY, CAROL R (AKA CAROL RENEE ANTHONY) 3/9/2022 190 Civil Foreclosure – Home Equity-Expedited
201881026- 7
Disposed (Final)
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY AS TRUSTEE IN TRUST FOR vs.
ANTHONY, CAROL R (AKA CAROL RENEE ANTHONY)
11/9/2018 190 Civil Foreclosure – Home Equity-Expedited
201704785- 7
Disposed (Final)
ANTHONY, CAROL ANN vs. ANTHONY, JOHN WARREN 1/24/2017 247 Family Divorce No Children
201340341- 7
Disposed (Final)
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY (AS TRUSTEE F vs.
ANTHONY, CAROL R (AKA CAROL RENEE ANTHONY)
7/10/2013 190 Civil Foreclosure – Home Equity-Expedited
200924762- 7
Disposed (Final)
ANTHONY, DENNIS ROY vs. ANTHONY, CAROLYN 4/23/2009 246 Family DIVORCE
200625943- 7
Disposed (Final)
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK  vs.
ANTHONY, CHARLES E
4/24/2006 127 Civil NOTE
200604665- 7
Disposed (Final)
ANTHONY, CAROL RENEE  vs. ANTHONY, CHARLES ELEN 1/24/2006 247 Family DIVORCE W / CHILDREN
200448400- 7
Disposed (Final)
ANTHONY, CHARLES ELEN  vs.
ANTHONY, CAROL RENEE
9/3/2004 247 Family DIVORCE W / CHILDREN
199350811- 7
Disposed (Final)
KENSWICK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION  vs. ANTHONY, CHARLES ELEN 10/1/1993 061 Civil Foreclosure – Other
198308965- 7
Disposed (Final)
ANTHONY, CHARLES  vs.
ANTHONY, CAROL RENE
1/28/1983 247 Family DIVORCE

2023-32483 –

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY AS TRUSTEE IN TRUST FOR vs. ANTHONY, CAROL R (AKA CAROL RENEE ANTHONY)

(Court 190, JUDGE BEAU MILLER)

MAY 24, 2023 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: APR 10, 2024
APR 10, 2024

Above is the date LIT Last updated this article.

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:

COMES NOW, Respondent CAROL R. ANTHONY (“Respondent”), by and through her attorney, and files this Response to Petitioner’s Application for an Expedited Foreclosure in the above styled and numbered cause. Respondent would respectfully show the Court the following:

I.                     General Denial and Defenses

1.                  Respondent admits she is an owner of the property that is the subject of this suit, which is her homestead.

2.                  Pursuant to Tex. R. Civ. P. 736.5(c), Respondent generally denies each and every allegation in the Petition filed by Plaintiff and demands that Plaintiff provide strict proof thereof.

3.                  Without waiving the foregoing general denial, Respondent files this response pursuant to Tex R. Civ. P. 736.5(c)(2) and asserts numerous defenses under Texas Constitution Article XVI § 50(a)(6).

Pursuant to Tex. R. Civ. P. 736.6, Respondent demands that Petitioner prove by affidavits on file, or evidence presented, the grounds for granting the order sought in the application, including evidence to overcome Respondent’s affirmative defenses plead under Texas Constitution Article XVI § 50(a)(6).

3.                  The claims asserted against Defendant are barred in whole, because Plaintiff violated Texas Constitution Article XVI, § 50(a)(6) on its face.

As such, the subject lien and security agreement are void.

4.                  The claims asserted against Defendant are barred in whole or in part by the doctrine of illegality.

5.                  Plaintiff failed to provide all notices required under the Deed of Trust and State law.

6.                  The claims asserted against Respondent are barred in whole or in part by the doctrine of estoppel.

7.                  An expedited foreclosure matter is already pending before this Court in CASE NO. 2022-14572: DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE, IN TRUST FOR REGISTERED HOLDERS OF WAMU ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES WAMU SERIES 2007-HE1 TRUST v. CAROL R. ANTHONY a/k/a CAROL RENEE ANTHONY, which alleges almost identical facts and the same requested relief.

II.                Prayer

WHEREFORE, premises considered, Respondent prays this Court deny Petitioner’s Application for an Expedited Order of Foreclosure. Respondent further prays that this Court grant her all relief at law and in equity to which she may be entitled.

Respectfully submitted,

LONE STAR LEGAL AID

/s/ Andrew Moore

ANDREW MOORE
State Bar No: 24105428
E-Mail: amoore@lonestarlegal.org
Lone Star Legal Aid
Military & Veterans Unit
2929 McKinney
Houston, Texas 77003

Ph. (844) 400-8387;
Fax: (713) 652-4063

Attorney for Respondent Carol Anthony

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served pursuant to Rules 21 and 21a of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, by facsimile, e-mail, certified mail, return receipt requested and/or first-class mail, on this the 5th day of July 2023 to:

Ronny George
13105 Northwest Freeway, Suite 960
Houston, TX 77040

Via E-service:
TXHomeEquity@logs.com

ATTORNEY FOR APPLICANT

/s/ Andrew Moore

Andrew Moore

Attorney for Respondent, Carol Anthony

2022-14572 –

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY AS TRUSTEE IN TRUST FOR vs. ANTHONY, CAROL R (AKA CAROL RENEE ANTHONY) 

(Court 190, JUDGE BEAU MILLER)

MAR 9, 2023 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: APR 10, 2024
APR 10, 2024

Above is the date LIT Last updated this article.

2018-81026 –

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY AS TRUSTEE IN TRUST FOR vs. ANTHONY, CAROL R (AKA CAROL RENEE ANTHONY)

(Court 190, JUDGE BEAU MILLER)

NOV 9, 2018 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: APR 10, 2024
APR 10, 2024

Above is the date LIT Last updated this article.

2006-25943 –

WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK vs. ANTHONY, CHARLES E

(Court 127)

 

SEP 26, 2006 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: APR 10, 2024
APR 10, 2024

Above is the date LIT Last updated this article.

Ten Buck Bandit: Lawyer Silvia Mintz Files Fraudulent Legal Docs in Harris County Real Property Records

This article will be updated once the foreclosure trustee deed is (or isn’t) posted in real property records.

Priority Mail: USPS Consistently Loses Time Sensitive Federal Court Filings for Weeks, Not Days

The excessive delays are when legal mailings are sent from Kingwood to the federal court mailing address in Houston, Texas from Joanna Burke.

Foreclosure Tyranny: Legal Entities Seize Homes with Immunity, Contradicting Consumer Protection Laws

Consumer Protection Conundrum: Unsecured Loan Collectors Accountable to Consumer Protection Laws While Foreclosure Entities Enjoy Immunity.

Expedited Foreclosure Lawsuit No. 4 filed by DBNTCO and SPS aka Select Portfolio Servicing v Anthony
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To Top