Deed of Trust

CP Invest $10 Bucks for a $200K Home in Houston

There’s a dispute over 1411 Big Horn Dr, Houston, TX 77090 and there’s ten dollars declared consideration for the plaintiff’s bare bones suit.

202307564

CP INVESTMENTS LLC vs. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC (DBA MR COOPER)

(Court 011, KRISTEN BRAUCHLE HAWKINS)

FEB 6, 2023 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: FEB 6, 2023

Mar 16, Apr 19, 2023

No movement for a month, since defendant’s answer and TI passed by plaintiff.

TI PASSED

DEFENDANT’S ORIGINAL ANSWER

Defendant, Nationstar Mortgage LLC d/b/a Mr. Cooper, (“Defendant”) files this, its Original Answer, in response to the Plaintiff CP Investments, LLC’s Original Petition, Application for Temporary Restraining Order, Temporary Injunction, and Permanent Injunction, and subsequent citation in this action and would respectfully show as follows:

I. GENERAL DENIAL

Pursuant to Rule 92 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant generally denies each and every allegation contained within Plaintiff’s Petition, Application for Temporary Restraining Order, Temporary Injunction, and Permanent Injunction and any amendments thereto and demands strict proof thereof as required by the Constitution and the laws of the State of Texas. Defendant further reserves the right to plead further and in greater particularity as the case progresses

II. ADDITIONAL DEFENSES

Defendant plead the following matters in defense, should the same be necessary:

1.                   Defendant specifically deny that all conditions precedent to Plaintiff’s claims for recover have occurred or been met.

2.                   In addition to and/or alternatively, without waiting the foregoing, Plaintiff’s claims are barred, in whole or in part, by the doctrines of waiver and/or estoppel.

3.                   In addition to and/or alternatively, without waiting the foregoing, Plaintiff’s claims are barred, in whole or in part, by the doctrines of unclean hands.

4.                   In addition to and/or alternatively, without waiting the foregoing, Plaintiff’s claims are barred in whole or in part, by the negligence and/or comparative responsibility of Plaintiff, persons acting on Plaintiff’s behalf and/or third parties.

5.                   In addition to and/or alternatively, without waiting the foregoing, Plaintiff’s claims are barred due to Defendant’s Compliance with the terms of the Deed of Trust and Texas Law.

6.                   In addition to and/or alternatively, without waiting the foregoing, Defendant would assert any and all limitations on exemplary damages, additional damages and/or punitive damages prescribed by the Texas Rule of Civil Procedure and/or case law and/or Civil Practice and Remedies Code.

7.                   In addition to and/or alternatively, without waiting the foregoing, Plaintiff’s claims are barred by the statute of limitations or laches.

8.                   In addition to and/or alternatively, without waiting the foregoing, Plaintiff’s claims are barred by the statute of frauds.

9.                   In addition to and/or alternatively, without waiting the foregoing, Plaintiff’s claims are barred by a lack of special duty.

10.               In addition to and/or alternatively, without waiting the foregoing, Plaintiff’s claims are barred by the economic loss doctrine.

11.               In addition to and/or alternatively, without waiting the foregoing, Plaintiff fail to state a claim on which relief can be granted.

III. DISCLOSURES – TRCP 194.2

Pursuant to Rule 194 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant requests that Plaintiffs disclose the information and material described in Rule 194.2 within 30 days of service.

IV. NOTICE – TRCP 193.7

Defendant hereby puts Plaintiffs on notice that Defendants intend to use Plaintiff’s discovery responses as evidence at trial in accordance with such rights and privileges established by Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 193.7.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Defendant pray that Plaintiff take nothing by this suit, that the Deed of Trust attached to the subject property be declared superior and enforceable and that Defendant go hence and recover costs in its behalf expended, as well as to such other and further relief as to which it may be justly entitled.

Respectfully submitted,

ROBERTSON, ANSCHUTZ, SCHNEID, CRANE & PARTNERS, PLLC

By: /s/ John R. Lawson

John R. Lawson
TSBN: 12059055
jlawson@raslg.com
5601 Executive Drive, Suite 400
Irving, TX 75038
Tel: (817) 873-3080, Ext 53173
Fax: (817) 796-6079

Attorneys for Defendant

Operation Blackstone: The Hot Facts and Timeline of Anthony Quinn Welch’s Incarceration for Tax Fraud

Anthony Quinn Welch was indicted on four counts of preparing false income tax returns and two counts of filing fraudulent income tax claims.

Operation Blackstone 2024: Texas, the Judiciary and US Government Cleanup of “Serial Squatter” Fraud

The time has arrived. Texas, the US Gov and related agencies implement cover up the financial crisis related fraud against Texan homeowners.

Who is Vinh Truong, Real Estate Investor, Motivational Speaker and Self-Claimed Venture Capitalist?

Vinh Truong owns and operates several businesses and websites involved in foreclosures and distressed real estate investment.

The case is styled CP Investments LLC, and we researched that company first, but found an affidavit from Cristina Tran of CP Rentals LLC [sic]. LIT believes the lawyers meant CP Rentals And Services LLC. We’ve left this info on here for now while they decide if they will amend the complaint to the provide the correct legal entity – which is kinda important.

CP Invest $10 Bucks for a $200K Home in Houston
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To Top