In this particular Opinion, it’s spits out that the litigant is not going to receive free filing due to being IFP, but instead the Koncaks’ are seen as filing “not in good faith” and hence frivilous.
“…we agree with the district court that the appeal lacks arguable merit and is not taken in good faith. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). The motion for leave to proceed IFP is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 201-02 & n.24; 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.”
Panel consisted of: ELROD, GRAVES & HO
The Eleventh Circuit’s “White Out” Opinions
Rubbin’ Out Kaplan lawyers criminal fraudulent transfers via fake billing; https://t.co/gSlENYszUE
Expunging Lyin’ Judge Marra’s perjurious words from their Opinion; https://t.co/jP5XvenMmb #WeThePeopleHaveSpoken @senfeinstein pic.twitter.com/OjMhaHa9qH
— LawsInTexas (@lawsintexasusa) November 7, 2020
Azuero is not a rainmaker and relies upon her working relationship @goodwinlaw That favors obedience. There is more social pressure to ‘win at any cost’. In this case, the victims are the Burkes and Azuero is responsible. She committed perjury and. withheld evidence. @TheFlaBar https://t.co/XHKOo5Kxkm pic.twitter.com/SfiUFAKOP1
— LawsInTexas (@lawsintexasusa) December 23, 2020