Foreclosures

Are You Bloody Kidding Again?

In this particular Opinion, it’s spits out that the litigant is not going to receive free filing due to being IFP, but instead the Koncaks’ are seen as filing “not in good faith” and hence frivilous.

In this particular Opinion, it’s spits out that the litigant is not going to receive free filing due to being IFP, but instead the Koncaks’ are seen as filing “not in good faith” and hence frivilous.

“…we agree with the district court that the appeal lacks arguable merit and is not taken in good faith. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). The motion for leave to proceed IFP is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 201-02 & n.24; 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.”

Panel consisted of: ELROD, GRAVES & HO

Koncak v Deutsche Bank

ELROD, JENNIFER W.

GRAVES, JAMES E. (JR)

HO, JAMES “JIM” C.

A Former Texas Associate Judge and Houston-Based Lawyer Don’t Know Basic Texas Law

Former Associate Judge and now Divorce Lawyer Ricardo L Ramos represented lawyer D Patrick Daniel in court and it didn’t go well for either.

Price Doesn’t Meet the High Standards Needed for a Pro Se Coming Before the Court, Sayeth the Fifth Circuit

What’s interesting here is Stanley Price complained about lower court Judge Vance, who was succeeded, albeit temporarily, by Judge Engelhardt who sat on the latest CA5 appeal.

It’s Not Only a Manifest Injustice, It’s a Perversion of Justice

Here, this Judicial Council has an opportunity to correct not only a manifest injustice, but perversion of justice. It should do so and reverse the Chief Judges’ erroneous order and proceed with a special committee investigation.

Are You Bloody Kidding Again?
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To Top