Foreclosures

Are You Bloody Kidding Again?

In this particular Opinion, it’s spits out that the litigant is not going to receive free filing due to being IFP, but instead the Koncaks’ are seen as filing “not in good faith” and hence frivilous.

In this particular Opinion, it’s spits out that the litigant is not going to receive free filing due to being IFP, but instead the Koncaks’ are seen as filing “not in good faith” and hence frivilous.

“…we agree with the district court that the appeal lacks arguable merit and is not taken in good faith. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). The motion for leave to proceed IFP is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 201-02 & n.24; 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.”

Panel consisted of: ELROD, GRAVES & HO

Koncak v Deutsche Bank

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Most Popular

Laws In Texas is a blog about the Financial Crisis and how the banks and government are colluding against the citizens and homeowners of the State of Texas and relying on a system of #FakeDocs and post-crisis legal precedents, specially created by the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to foreclose on homeowners around this great State. We are not lawyers. We do not offer legal advice. We are citizens of the State of Texas who have spent a decade in the court system in Texas and have been party to during this period to the good, the bad and the very ugly.

Donate to LawsInTexas. Make a Difference.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

We keep your data private and share your data only with third parties that make this service possible. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

© 2020 Laws In Texas. | All Rights Reserved.

To Top