LIT UPDATE
JUNE 21, 2021
The Fifth Circuit New Bias 3-Panel, including the Chief of Mischief Judge Priscilla Owen, deny the Burkes motion. Now that’s a statement of fact.
Before Owen, Chief Judge, and Davis and Dennis, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:
A member of this panel previously DENIED pro se appellants’ motion for authorization to omit the [ambiguous local rule re] Statement of Facts requirement in pro se appellants’ Petition for Rehearing En Banc. The panel has considered appellants’ motion for reconsideration.
IT IS ORDERED that the motion is DENIED.
LIT UPDATE
JUNE 8, 2021
The Fifth Circuit replied to the Burkes renewed motion with a cover letter which notices the Burkes that they’ve changed the Pro Se rules in June 2021 as a personal vendetta against the elder litigants.
The Burkes have communicated via email for a lengthy period of time and the court accepted those communications. Now the appellate court has made another sweeping change to the rules for no good cause, but they forget LIT are always data hungry and the meta data on the new rules (PDF) confirms the mercenary tactics.
Watch the short video below for a detailed explanation.
JUNE 7, 2021
The Burkes filed a renewed motion for reconsideration of a single judges order tonight after waiting all day for the court to reply via email, which it did not. It is shown below.
LIT COMMENTARY
This is a follow up on the last article (or many) about the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit re the Burkes case[s]. Today the Burkes responded to the last order issued by Judge James Dennis, for the court. Below is the motion for an extension of time to file a motion for reconsideration of a single judge’s order by the 3-panel.
Date: Wed, May 19, 2021 at 2:04 PM
From: <cmecf_caseprocessing@ca5.uscourts.gov>
Date: Wed, May 19, 2021 at 2:04 PM
Subject: 19-20267 Burke v. Ocwen Loan Servicing “Unfiled Document”
To: <kajongwe@gmail.com>
***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing.
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Notice of Docket Activity
The following transaction was entered on 05/19/2021 at 1:50:57 PM CDT and filed on 05/14/2021
Case Name: Burke v. Ocwen Loan Servicing
Case Number: 19-20267
Document(s): Document(s)
Docket Text:
DOCUMENT RECEIVED – NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the motion for reconsideration of single judge’s order received from Appellants Ms. Joanna Burke and Mr. John Burke in 19-20267 because the motion is premature, as the extension motion is still pending with the court [19-20267, 20-20209] (JMW)
Date: Fri, May 28, 2021 at 3:01 PM (Memorial Day Weekend)
From: <cmecf_caseprocessing@ca5.uscourts.gov>
Date: Fri, May 28, 2021 at 3:01 PM
Subject: 19-20267 Burke v. Ocwen Loan Servicing “Non Dispositive Court Order denying extend time to file rehearing”
To: <kajongwe@gmail.com>
***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing.
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL AS IT ORIGINATES FROM AN UNATTENDED EMAIL ADDRESS.
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Notice of Docket Activity
The following transaction was entered on 05/28/2021 at 2:56:44 PM CDT and filed on 05/28/2021
Case Name: Burke v. Ocwen Loan Servicing
Case Number: 19-20267
Document(s): Document(s)
Docket Text:
COURT ORDER denying Motion to extend the time to file a petition for rehearing filed by Appellant Mr. John Burke [9572022-2] [19-20267, 20-20209] (JMW)
Motion to Extend Time to File Bankruptcy Schedules Granted to Lawyers Before Judge Jeffrey Norman
Formerly of W.D. Louisiana, now S.D. Texas Bankruptcy Court, Judge Jeffrey Norman’s rules are indiscriminate as applied to litigants filing bankruptcy in his court.
A Fifth Circuit Clerk Corruptly Impersonating Appellants Induces Finality of Appeal
Fifth Circuit Clerk Gardner, with knowledge and in bad faith, entered her own fraudulent Motion upon which the 5th Cir. entered its judgment.
The Ultimate in Corrupt Opinions. Fifth Circuit Issue Mandate Based on 5th Circuit Clerks Motion.
The Burkes now have proof beyond a reasonable doubt of Elder Abuse in Texas Federal Courts. It’s now a valid Criminal Complaint.
| General Docket United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
