LIT UPDATE
JUNE 21, 2021
The Fifth Circuit New Bias 3-Panel, including the Chief of Mischief Judge Priscilla Owen, deny the Burkes motion. Now that’s a statement of fact.
Before Owen, Chief Judge, and Davis and Dennis, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:
A member of this panel previously DENIED pro se appellants’ motion for authorization to omit the [ambiguous local rule re] Statement of Facts requirement in pro se appellants’ Petition for Rehearing En Banc. The panel has considered appellants’ motion for reconsideration.
IT IS ORDERED that the motion is DENIED.
LIT UPDATE
JUNE 8, 2021
The Fifth Circuit replied to the Burkes renewed motion with a cover letter which notices the Burkes that they’ve changed the Pro Se rules in June 2021 as a personal vendetta against the elder litigants.
The Burkes have communicated via email for a lengthy period of time and the court accepted those communications. Now the appellate court has made another sweeping change to the rules for no good cause, but they forget LIT are always data hungry and the meta data on the new rules (PDF) confirms the mercenary tactics.
Watch the short video below for a detailed explanation.
JUNE 7, 2021
The Burkes filed a renewed motion for reconsideration of a single judges order tonight after waiting all day for the court to reply via email, which it did not. It is shown below.
LIT COMMENTARY
This is a follow up on the last article (or many) about the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit re the Burkes case[s]. Today the Burkes responded to the last order issued by Judge James Dennis, for the court. Below is the motion for an extension of time to file a motion for reconsideration of a single judge’s order by the 3-panel.
Date: Wed, May 19, 2021 at 2:04 PM
From: <cmecf_caseprocessing@ca5.uscourts.gov>
Date: Wed, May 19, 2021 at 2:04 PM
Subject: 19-20267 Burke v. Ocwen Loan Servicing “Unfiled Document”
To: <kajongwe@gmail.com>
***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing.
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Notice of Docket Activity
The following transaction was entered on 05/19/2021 at 1:50:57 PM CDT and filed on 05/14/2021
Case Name: Burke v. Ocwen Loan Servicing
Case Number: 19-20267
Document(s): Document(s)
Docket Text:
DOCUMENT RECEIVED – NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the motion for reconsideration of single judge’s order received from Appellants Ms. Joanna Burke and Mr. John Burke in 19-20267 because the motion is premature, as the extension motion is still pending with the court [19-20267, 20-20209] (JMW)
Date: Fri, May 28, 2021 at 3:01 PM (Memorial Day Weekend)
From: <cmecf_caseprocessing@ca5.uscourts.gov>
Date: Fri, May 28, 2021 at 3:01 PM
Subject: 19-20267 Burke v. Ocwen Loan Servicing “Non Dispositive Court Order denying extend time to file rehearing”
To: <kajongwe@gmail.com>
***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing.
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL AS IT ORIGINATES FROM AN UNATTENDED EMAIL ADDRESS.
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Notice of Docket Activity
The following transaction was entered on 05/28/2021 at 2:56:44 PM CDT and filed on 05/28/2021
Case Name: Burke v. Ocwen Loan Servicing
Case Number: 19-20267
Document(s): Document(s)
Docket Text:
COURT ORDER denying Motion to extend the time to file a petition for rehearing filed by Appellant Mr. John Burke [9572022-2] [19-20267, 20-20209] (JMW)
Federal Judges Invent Jurisdiction to Issue Lawless Writ of Execution Aimed at 86-Yr Old Widow
Contrary to what Plaintiff argues, subject matter jurisdiction existed in this Court at the time of removal. – Magistrate Judge Chris Bryan.
Criminal Acts: Outlaw Federal Judges Lawless Orders to Seize Homes Contrary to Texas Laws
This judicial order, which erroneously claims the lien has already been foreclosed would allow the lender a minimum of 10 years to foreclose.
US Gov. Enforcing Lawless Writ Which Silences Truth to Steal Texans Homes by Federal Judges in 2025
PHH has been burdened by Plaintiff’s continued litigation, as have various lawyers and government officials in the court system.
| General Docket United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
