LIT Update Post Judgment
OCT 11, 2022
ALMANZA v. Royal Pacific Funding Corp.
(7:22-cv-00089)
District Court, W.D. Texas
APR 13, 2022 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: APR 14, 2022
Judgment issued Aug 17, 2022
For the reasons stated above, it is RECOMMENDED that Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings be GRANTED. (Doc. 11).
No movement since May.
Motion for judgment on the pleadings filed prematurely (5 days after removal), answered May 11.
U.S. District Court [LIVE]
Western District of Texas (Midland)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 7:22-cv-00089-DC-RCG
Create an Alert for This Case on RECAP
| ALMANZA v. Royal Pacific Funding Corp. Assigned to: Judge David Counts Referred to: Judge Ronald C. Griffin Demand: $75,000 Cause: 28:1441 Petition for Removal – Foreclosure |
Date Filed: 04/13/2022 Jury Demand: None Nature of Suit: 220 Real Property: Foreclosure Jurisdiction: Diversity |
| Date Filed | # | Docket Text |
|---|---|---|
| 04/18/2022 | 8 | FIRST AMENDED ANSWER to Complaint by Royal Pacific Funding Corp..(Gray, Travis) (Entered: 04/18/2022) |
| 04/18/2022 | 9 | Certificate of Interested Parties CORRECTED by Royal Pacific Funding Corp.. (Gray, Travis) (Entered: 04/18/2022) |
| 04/18/2022 | 10 | NOTICE NOTICE OF SERVICE OF RULE 26(a)(1) INITIAL DISCLOSURES by Royal Pacific Funding Corp. (Gray, Travis) (Entered: 04/18/2022) |
| 04/18/2022 | 11 | MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings by Royal Pacific Funding Corp.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Proposed Order). Motions referred to Judge Ronald C. Griffin. (Gray, Travis) (Entered: 04/18/2022) |
| 04/18/2022 | 12 |
ORDER AND ADVISORY. Signed by Judge David Counts. (kg) (Entered: 04/18/2022) |
| 05/05/2022 | 13 | MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 700017574) by Karla M. Almanza.. Motions referred to Judge Ronald C. Griffin. (kg) (Entered: 05/05/2022) |
| 05/11/2022 | 14 | CONSENT to Trial by US Magistrate Judge by Karla M. Almanza. (Barron, Thomas) (Entered: 05/11/2022) |
| 05/11/2022 | 15 | Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Karla M. Almanza, re 11 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Defendant Royal Pacific Funding Corp. (Barron, Thomas) (Entered: 05/11/2022) |
About Royal Pacific Funding
Our Story
Royal Pacific Funding was founded in 1991 as a wholesale residential mortgage lender in Orange County, California. Over the years, RPF has evolved into a premier lender with its wholesale channel operating under Bluepoint Mortgage – a wholly owned subsidiary of Royal Pacific Funding Corp., and a FNMA, FHLMC and GNMA approved seller/issuer. The company is now licensed to lend in 29 states and continues to grow its reach nationwide. RPF has not only endured but flourished in the housing market over the last three decades, fine-tuning its business strategies and gaining valuable insights along the way. With 30 years of commitment and service to the lending community, RPF shares that knowledge with its respected partners.
Our MISSION is to provide our partners with the support and industry knowledge that deliver valuable solutions, cultivating financial success.
Our VISION is to continue serving the mortgage community with straight-forward, resourceful customer and operational service that deliver answers and results to our partners empowering them to implement their optimal business strategies and offer competitive loan products.
Our VALUES are providing only the best-in-class service and fair dealings to our partnerships. RPF is focused on continuing the advancement of mortgage lending as a whole and adding liquidity to the industry at large.
The Distressed Sweeney’s Return to Court with Absentee Defense Lawyer Gannon the Cannon
After dismissal of their federal lawsuit and termination of relationship with lawyer Dave Medearis, the Sweeney’s hire J GANNON HELSTOWSKI.
Emplify LLC’s Chase Foreman Appears Pro Se in Foreclosure Proceedings for Investment Property
Previously Acting Pro Se for His LLC, Foreman Faces Legal Challenges Under Texas Law when trying to stop foreclosure of business property.
Three-time Divorced Veteran Stephen Dunn’s Ten Buck Fraudulent Conveyance by Vilt and Associates
Why Are Vilt and His Associates Receiving Assistance from the U.S. Government Given the Number of Similar Cases Surrounding Their Actions?
