Deutsche Bank

US Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas Stands With the Partisan Conservative Federalist Society in Florida Chapter Meeting

THE JUDICIAL OATH: In sum, the Committee advises that formal affiliation with the American Constitution Society or the Federalist Society, whether as a member or in a leadership role, is inconsistent with Canons 1, 2, 4, and 5 of the Code.


The end of the month saw another 1,000 lawyers and judges descend upon a Disneyland and Superbowl weekend in Florida to hawk conservative policies between each other. Justice Clarence Thomas was the invited US Supreme Court justice and who you will note in the article below, is a long-time advocate of the Federalist Society.

In November 2019, the annual @fedsoc conference event in Washington DC invited guest speakers Justice Kavanaugh and Attorney General William ‘Bill’ Barr. It appears that most of the sitting judges at the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit were in attendance, either as guests or moderators.

In this latest Florida Chapter event, the Eleventh Circuit had several judges in attendance, but they all refused to comment on whether is was ‘ethical’ for them to be there.

It was also very notable that the usually social Federalist Society elected to turn off the streaming social media videos. In the Washington conference, the videos were up in a jiffy. Not so this time – we wonder why…

p.s. We’re publishing the authors’ article from WSJ but LIT cannot agree with his interpretation of the new draft rules. You can read them here.

Justice Clarence Thomas Questions Proposal to Bar Judges From Membership in Ideological Groups

Ethics proposal by federal judiciary’s policy-making body would tighten guidance letting them belong to two organizations but not take leadership roles

Original Published Date; Feb 2, 2020

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas questioned a proposed ethics rule that would discourage federal judges from belonging to the conservative Federalist Society and its liberal counterpart, the American Constitution Society.

Justice Thomas has long participated in events sponsored by the Federalist Society, which has groomed many of President Trump’s judicial nominees.

“And now I think they’re about to silence the Federalist Society. So I guess I can’t come back,” Justice Thomas quipped Friday at Federalist Society convention at Walt Disney World.

“Some of us are fighting back,” responded U.S. Circuit Judge Gregory Katsas, a former Thomas law clerk who interviewed his former boss before the audience.

The ethics proposal, circulated last month by the federal judiciary’s policy-making body, the Judicial Conference of the U.S., would tighten existing guidance that lets judges belong to the two groups but not take leadership roles.

The American Constitution Society is a group founded in 2001 by liberals seeking to replicate the Federalist Society’s success in developing a network of like-minded legal power brokers. The group’s website says ACS “nurtures the next generation of progressive lawyers, judges, policy experts, legislators, and academics.” A spokesman for the group couldn’t be reached to comment.

The ethics proposal also included cautionary words regarding the much larger American Bar Association.

“In the current politically divisive climate,“ the Judicial Council said, ”positions taken by the ABA’s House of Delegates could reasonably be viewed to favor liberal or progressive causes.”

The council didn’t recommend barring judges from belonging to the bar association, citing ABA rules that place judges in a section not involved in taking legal or political positions and said that the organization’s professional activities were significantly broader.

Justice Thomas’s comments followed commentary published in the National Review by conservative activist Carrie Severino headlined, “The Judicial Campaign to Silence the Federalist Society.”

Under the draft proposal, however, judges could still attend and participate in events sponsored by the groups, such as panel discussions and symposiums. But it concludes that formal membership in organizations so closely identified with ideological missions could undermine public confidence in the courts’ independence.

“A reasonable and informed public would view judges holding membership in these organizations to hold, advocate, and serve liberal or conservative interests,” rather than being impartial, the proposal reads.

The Federalist Society’s president, Eugene Meyer, asserted it was beneficial for judges to be exposed to rigorous intellectual debate. “We’re an organization about ideas,” he said.

Founded in 1982, the Federalist Society doesn’t formally take policy positions. But membership has come to signal conservative bona fides for law students, lawyers and academics seeking advancement in Republican circles.

According to Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D., R.I.), a harsh critic of the society, 85% of President Trump’s circuit and Supreme Court nominees were members. A society spokeswoman said the organization doesn’t disclose its membership.

In his appearance Friday, Justice Thomas recalled serving on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit during the 1990-91 term when another judge’s law clerk sought his career advice.

The clerk, Leonard Leo, was torn between entering private practice or taking a “public service” position with the Federalist Society. “And I asked him, ‘Where was his heart?’ And he said, ‘With the Federalist Society’,” Justice Thomas said. “And I said, ‘You should go do that.’ And he did. And look at the difference he’s made.”

Mr. Leo, for many years the society’s executive vice president, became a judicial adviser to President Trump who helped guide the nominations of Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, along with many lower-court judges.

On a Saturday panel including four Trump appointees to the Atlanta-based 11th Circuit, several offered thanks to Federalist Society stalwarts who helped them advance, including former White House Counsel Don McGahn, who spoke earlier at the convention, and Judge Katsas, a deputy counsel before President Trump appointed him to the D.C. Circuit.

The judges— Lisa Branch, Britt Grant, Barbara Lagoa and Robert Luck —all declined to comment on the ethics proposal.

Foreclosure: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Ask CFPB to Weigh In on Homeowner versus PHH Ocwen

Kim Naimoli v Ocwen Loan Servicing, now PHH Mortgage Corporation receives response from CFPB at request of Second Circuit Panel on Appeal.

LIT Reviews Government Employees Blocking Twitter Users Lawsuits

Once again, you can blame the US Supreme Court, who avoided answering the Trump Twitter Blocking Petition by intentionally delaying the case.

New Texas Appellate Justice April Farris Discusses Her Family, Career and “Imposter Syndrome”

One of the biggest barriers April Farris faced was a personal barrier: imposter syndrome after growing up in a small West Texas town.

The Jack Abramoff Scandal Series: United States v. Andrade

Private Attorneys for Rowland M. Andrade Seek to Remove Themselves from Representation of Andrade After LIT Spotlights this Criminal Case.

Why the Chief Can’t Judge Everything – Even with Judicial Immunity

No [wo]man in this country is so high that [s]he is above the law. No officer of the law may set that law at defiance with impunity.

Creditor Rights BigLaw Firm Goodwin Procter LLP are Whining in Op-Eds for their Wall St Banking Clients

The CFPB amendments provide that a mortgage servicer can offer a streamline modification to borrowers with COVID-19-related hardship based on an incomplete package.

US Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas Stands With the Partisan Conservative Federalist Society in Florida Chapter Meeting
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Laws In Texas is a blog about the Financial Crisis and how the banks and government are colluding against the citizens and homeowners of the State of Texas and relying on a system of #FakeDocs and post-crisis legal precedents, specially created by the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to foreclose on homeowners around this great State. We are not lawyers. We do not offer legal advice. We are citizens of the State of Texas who have spent a decade in the court system in Texas and have been party to during this period to the good, the bad and the very ugly.

Donate to LawsInTexas. Make a Difference.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

We keep your data private and share your data only with third parties that make this service possible. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

© 2020-21 LawInTexas com is an online trading name which is wholly owned by Blogger Inc., a nonprofit 501(c)(3) registered in Delaware. | All Rights Reserved.

To Top