Fraud

Trailer Trash: IFP Thug With a JD and Felon Andrew Peter Lehman Sr’s Story Doesn’t Square With Defendants

Lehman’s acts ratify the targeting of Blogger Inc. by California’s corrupt Judiciary who were complicit in all acts described on LIT.

202487786 –

LEHMAN, ANDREW (SR) vs. DEL ANGEL TRAILER RENTAL LLC

 (Court 189, OUTLAW TAMI CRAFT)

DEC 16, 2024 | REPUBLISHED: JAN 12, 2025

To The Honorable Judge of Said Court:

Defendants Del Angel Trailer Rental, LLC; Antonio Del Angel; and the incorrectly named Omar Del Angele file this original answer to the Plaintiff’s petition, and would respectfully show the court the following:

Defendants assert a general denial as is authorized by Rule 92 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant respectfully requests that the Plaintiff be required to prove the charges and allegations against this Defendant by the applicable quantum of proof, as is required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Texas.

Affirmative Defenses and Direct Benefits Estoppel Accord and Satisfaction, Compromise and Settlement, and Novation

The parties settled the dispute over the handling of Plaintiff’s personal property when Plaintiff represented to one or more Defendants that he had secured a rental or lease agreement with a storage facility, and Defendants aided Plaintiff in removing his belongings from the trailer.

Defendants specifically deny dumping anything whatsoever.

Disclaimer

Plaintiff disclaimed any warranties in the agreement.

Ratification and Direct Benefits Estoppel

Plaintiff seeks remedies and causes of action under an agreement. Plaintiff, even if not bound by said agreement originally, is bound to that agreement under the theory of ratification or direct benefit estoppel.

Anticipatory Repudiation

The opposing parties repudiated their agreement to return the trailer to the rental location and intended to dump the trailer in an unknown part of California.

Proportionate Responsibility

Pleading further, without waiving the general denial, if such be necessary, Defendant pleads that any harm or damages to claim were based in whole of in part on the actions of each claimant; each subsequently named responsible third party who has been designated under Section 33.004 or subsequently named third party defendant.

Such proportionate responsibility should be applied because

A.    Each of those parties damaged the trailer or allowed the trailer to be damaged while in his or her care;

B.     One or more of the parties was intoxicated or otherwise acting negligently while in possession of the trailer;

C.     The parties intended to abscond with the trailer to California without returning the trailer;

D.    The parties, if they did not have the right to store their belongings at the storage space they selected, misrepresented that fact to Plaintiffs either intentionally or negligently;

E.     The parties breached one or more agreements with one or more of the Defendants;

F.      The parties refused to communicate with the Defendants about the whereabouts of the trailer, despite their duty to do so;

and

G.    The parties acted generally negligent so as to make Defendants fear for the condition of the trailer.

Additional Items

Notice is given that any and all documents produced during discovery may be used at any pre-trial proceeding or trial of this matter without necessity of authenticating the documents.

This notice is given pursuant to Rule 193.7 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

Jury Demand and Prayer for Relief

The defendant respectfully demands a jury and prays that the Plaintiff take nothing; that this Defendant be allowed to recover the costs which have been incurred by reason of the charges and allegations of the Plaintiff against this Defendant; and that the court give this Defendant such other and further relief from these charges as the court may feel that this Defendant is entitled to.

Respectfully Submitted,

Chavana Law, PLLC:

/s/ Alejandro Cortez
Alejandro Cortez
alejandro@chavana.lawyer
State Bar of Texas Number 24140334

/s/ Hector Chavana Jr.
Hector A. Chavana Jr.
hector@chavana.lawyer

State of Texas Bar Number 24101382
2702 Little York Rd
Houston, TX 77093
Phone 713-979-2941
Fax 281-783-2773
Attorneys for Defendants

Certificate of Service

This is to certify that the attached answer was served on all counsel of record on January 11, 2025.

Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Hector Chavana Jr.
Hector A. Chavana Jr.
Attorney For Defendant

On or about October 16, 2024, Plaintiff, Andrew Lehman Sr., entered into an agreement….

Plaintiff had all his personal belongings packed in the trailer which included…items from his 7-bedroom home, office equipment from his 1,200 sq ft office…

..as part of a planned move to San Antonio, TX…

…return to their former home in Sugar Land, Texas.

LITX

FEB 16, 2025

Bullet in The Back: Thug With a JD and Felon Lehman Contracted by Government as Covert Operative

Felon Lehman is a pawn, with government power recklessly inciting illegal acts by violent legal agents at the expense of justice.

California Supreme Court Rejects Opinions Restricting Time Limit to Set Aside Default Judgments

Procedural hurdles that are unnecessary to the fair adjudication of default judgments should not stand in the way of due process rights.

Threatening Journalists: Thug Without a JD Sentenced to 27 Months Jail by Federal Judge Talwani

Tucker Cockerline, 33, of Salem, N.H., was sentenced Tuesday to 27 months in prison and three years of supervised release for his role

Delaware’s Chief Judge Leads the Way in Legal Scrutiny: A Model for State and Federal Courts

Over the 18 months, the Chief Judge of Delaware has identified potential attorney and party misconduct in dozens of related patent cases.

Thug With a JD Andrew Lehman’s Articles Triggered a Reaction from Indicted and Incarcerated Chris Badsey

COVID Scam: Chris Badsey falsely represented that he had millions of boxes of medical-grade gloves and secured millions in deposits.

Anti-Consumer Watchdog CFPB Blanks Andrew Lehman’s Violations of Suspended Judgment

The order imposes a suspended judgment against CFLA and Lehman for redress of $3 million and imposes a civil money penalty of $40,000

The War on Whistleblowers: Insights into Our American Government’s Dirty Tactics Employing Judicial Enforcers

Targeted for Truth: LIT Faces Increased Legal Challenges as Government ‘Wing Men’ Ramp Up Lawsuits with Judicial Enforcers Ready to Support.

Lisa Mills is Attempting to Evict Scary Andrew Lehman from her Magnolia Residence

Andrew Lehman misrepresented his income and other facts to Mills to induce her to lease her house to him in Magnolia. He scares her too.

GCSO Bodycam Withheld after Attempted Murder of Patrick Cline by Andrew Lehman in Galveston

The Redacted GCSO Report from Galveston regarding Andrew Peter Lehman’s Attempted Murder of Patrick Cline with Monica Riley As Accomplice

Take 2: Attorney Chris Gregg Falsely Refuses PIA Request in Continued Blackballin’ of LIT by Texas Gov. Entities

Police recording, with certain portions redacted for privacy is subject to disclosure under the PIA as part of a completed investigation.

Transparency in Question: Harris County Attorney’s Office Rejects Open Records Request in High-Stake Cases

Asst County Attorney Haley New’s LinkedIn Connection Raises Eyebrows as Harris County Attorney’s Office Blocks Open Records Request.

2022 Ends with Investigation into Andrew P. Lehman, CFLA, Lehman Brothers LLC, Lehman Data Analytics et al

This is a new article. It will be updated frequently. Bookmark as LIT reviews Andrew Lehman, post CFPB settlement.

The CFPB Claim $3m Restitution from Forensic Loan Scam Co. The Fact is the $3M is Suspended. These Two Thieves Should be In Jail

Andrew Lehman and Michael Carrigan haven’t got $30k never mind $3 million and that’s why its a fully suspended payment. It’s a CFPB PR stunt.

When a Bank Asks A Court to Find For Loan Application Fraud vs. When a Homeowner Asks the Court to Find for Loan Application Fraud

An attorney for the Banc of California told a judge Thursday that his client is seeking a default judgment against the former son-in-law of President Donald Trump’s former campaign chairman for allegedly defrauding the institution on a loan, and court papers show the amount sought is more than $750,000.

Trailer Trash: IFP Thug With a JD and Felon Andrew Peter Lehman Sr’s Story Doesn’t Square With Defendants
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To Top