In the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals decision, Bartolowits v Wells Fargo they evaded the motion to amend by the usual call, first argument denial, e.g.
“Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment. Bartolowits argues that the district court abused its discretion in denying the motion to alter or amend the judgment because Texas law prohibited Wells Fargo from making the tax payment on unsecured property and then charging it to the loan secured by the deed of trust.
“Rule 59(e) ‘motions cannot be used to raise arguments that could, and should, have been made before the judgment issued.’” Marseilles Homeowners Condo. Ass’n Inc. v. Fid. Nat. Ins. Co., 542 F.3d 1053, 1058 (5th Cir. 2008) (per curiam) (quoting Simon v. United States, 891 F.2d 1154, 1159 (5th Cir. 1990)).
Because this argument was made for the first time in the motion to alter or amend judgment, but could have been made prior to entry of judgment, we hold that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. AFFIRMED. “
Before KING, HAYNES, and HIGGINSON
Post Edited: The Fifth Circuit Panel of Graves, Higginbotham and Higginson Give ‘Rookie’ Supreme Justice Kavanaugh t https://t.co/o18j52jOwn
— LawsInTexas (@lawsintexasusa) December 24, 2020
Post Edited: After Oral Argument The Fifth Circuit Panel of Oldham, Willett and Owen May Reject US Supreme Court https://t.co/qclV5QY8FM
— LawsInTexas (@lawsintexasusa) December 24, 2020
2021 Most Wanted Stamp Collection Part I.
Outlaws in Robes. A LIT Series. https://t.co/GxZKmIgNIU
No Bull. Just the Truth.
We Light Up Corruption. pic.twitter.com/pA4Lu6rI5H— LawsInTexas (@lawsintexasusa) December 24, 2020