GUIELLMO, RUDOLPH vs. SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING LLC
(Court 215, Judge Elaine Palmer)
SEP 22, 2022 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: SEP 25, 2022
Which Property is Your “Main Residence”, Rudolph?
It looks like Rudolph purchased residential home 8234 Quiet Prairie Trl, Houston, TX 77049 just before Hurricane Harvey – in May of 2017 (per HCAD). Currently, the property is listed for sale but this is where he claims to be residing per HCAD. The Humble property, subject to foreclosure, shows a PO Box address and that leads LIT to believe he moved from this ‘main residence’ to the Houston property, sometime after May 2017. That stated, this information is contradicted by the fact that Doris and Edward Fairley are listed as living in the Houston property since 2021.
What Have You Disclosed in Your ‘Restricted’ IFP Application to the Court?
Certainly, Rudolph hasn’t mentioned his Houston property in the complaint nor affidavit and there appears to have been tenants (Fairley’s) in the property in 2021 to present per internet records. Is that rental income disclosed?
COMPARE FEDERAL JUDGE HANKS WITH STATE JUDGE PALMER RE IFP CONSIDERATION TIMELINE
2 Paycheck Protection Program Loans for Exactly the Same Amount from 2 Separate Lenders
What about the 2 PPP loans issued by 2 banks for the exact same payroll amount, one in April 2021 and one in May 2021. Did you apply to multiple lenders and then when you received two offers for the same payroll, and elected to criminally accepted both loans? Don’t get too worried though, the government will turn away from prosecuting you if you did, as we’ve highlighted other instances where this has happened and the prosecutors will reject prosecution due to $20k being a small sum, considering the billions of dollars milked by citizens and non-citizens fraudulent PPP loan applications.
Bookmark for updates on this pro se foreclosure case.