Of the estimated 1,600 CFPB’s employees, 13 percent make more than $200,000 per year, according to the internal documents, which showed that the average employee’s annual salary is $139,315.
The bureau’s pay scale, which is similar to the Federal Reserve’s, exceeds that of most federal agencies, and the highest potential salary at the CFPB is $259,500.
Unlike other federal agencies, the CFPB receives its funding through the Fed, and is not subject to the annual congressional appropriations process — which Mulvaney and other CFPB critics contend makes the bureau unaccountable to the public.
That equates to 219 (per NYT) employees and looking at the $259,500 paypoint; a whopping $56,830,500 is the CFPB payroll bill per annum just for those employees.
If we average the remaining 1361 staff at an average of $139,315 p.a., that equates to $192,394,015 bill per annum.
So, Grand Total Per Annum for the CFPB in payroll billing alone; $249,224,515 ($250 Million TaxPayer Dollars Per Annum).
Consumer Bureau’s (former) Chief Gives Big Raises, Even as He Criticizes Spending
Mick Mulvaney, the acting director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, has complained that the regulator engages in “wasteful spending” and needs to be slimmed down. To underscore the point, he submitted a quarterly budget request recently that was a nice round number: $0.
That attitude, though, apparently didn’t apply to two of his recent hires.
Mr. Mulvaney appointed two senior staff members who are paid salaries of more than $230,000, amounts that are far above what they had been earning in their previous government jobs in Washington, according to agency documents obtained by The New York Times through a public records request.
The consumer bureau, as well as fellow financial regulators like the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, is allowed under federal law to pay employees significantly more than other government agencies can pay. The rationale is that the higher salaries are necessary to recruit skilled employees who otherwise might land jobs on Wall Street.
As a result, the C.F.P.B. is stocked with employees who earn more than the average Washington bureaucrat. Of the agency’s 1,600 employees, 219 make more than $200,000, according to the records reviewed by The Times.
The Trump administration and Republican lawmakers have been trying to defang the agency, which they view as overly tough on the finance industry. One weapon they have tried to employ — so far, unsuccessfully — is to reduce the amount of money the agency can pay employees.
Sutton-Mork Annual Salary : $259,500
But Mr. Mulvaney was willing to shell out top dollar for his highest-ranking appointees.
When Mr. Mulvaney hired Kirsten Sutton Mork in January to be the agency’s chief of staff, he agreed to pay her $259,500 a year, according to the documents obtained by The Times. Her salary is the highest allowed under the consumer bureau’s pay scale. (The hiring documents identify her as Kirsten Mork, but professionally, she uses the surname Sutton.)
That salary represents a raise of more than 50 percent from what Ms. Sutton earned in her previous job working for one of the C.F.P.B.’s fiercest critics, Representative Jeb Hensarling of Texas, the Republican chairman of the House Financial Services Committee. Last year, as the committee’s staff director, she earned a salary of about $170,000, according to data from LegiStorm, which tracks congressional salaries.
Ms. Sutton is making 22 percent more than her predecessor, Leandra English, who earned $212,324 as chief of staff, according to the office of Senator Ron Johnson. Mr. Johnson, a Wisconsin Republican, had requested Ms. English’s pay records as part of an inquiry into the C.F.P.B.’s hiring practices.
Like Ms. Sutton, Brian Johnson, another new deputy, previously worked on the House Financial Services Committee. In his most recent job there, as policy director, he earned about $170,000 a year, according to LegiStorm.
When he agreed to join the C.F.P.B. as a senior adviser, Mr. Johnson was sent a letter from a federal human resources employee. “Welcome and congratulations,” said the Dec. 1 letter, which set his starting salary at $220,000.
Before Mr. Johnson’s first paycheck even arrived, his salary already had been raised. In late December, Mr. Mulvaney signed paperwork that awarded Mr. Johnson a salary of $239,595. The document didn’t say why Mr. Johnson’s salary had gone up by $19,000, and a C.F.P.B. spokeswoman declined to comment on the increase.
Of the 20 people at the bureau with the title of senior adviser, Mr. Johnson is the second-highest paid. (Another adviser, whose name wasn’t disclosed in the public records reviewed by The Times, is paid $240,000.)
“Non-career staff are being paid on par with the career staff who directly report to them,” Jen Howard, a spokeswoman for the consumer bureau, said in a written response to questions from The Times. Her statement blamed Richard Cordray, the agency’s previous director, for setting the precedent of paying large salaries to senior leaders.
Ms. Sutton and Mr. Johnson did not respond to requests for comment.
Mr. Mulvaney himself is not collecting a salary at the bureau. He is on temporary loan from the Office of Management and Budget, where he is paid a base salary of $199,700, according to FedSmith, which tracks federal employee salaries. Federal rules generally prohibit employees from being paid by more than one agency even when they are juggling multiple jobs, as Mr. Mulvaney is.
The consumer bureau’s high salaries have long been a sore point for the agency’s critics. Republican lawmakers have repeatedly introduced legislation — most recently in November — that would reduce salaries at the agency by shifting its workers to the government’s standard pay scale. Under that scale, salaries generally max out at $164,200. Democrats have blocked each attempt.
Ms. Howard, the agency spokeswoman, said that Mr. Mulvaney “would be happy” to work with Congress to change the bureau’s pay practices.
In the latest White House budget proposal that Mr. Mulvaney’s office prepared, the Trump administration blasted the consumer bureau for its history of “poor financial and personnel management decisions.” It also asked Congress to curb the agency’s authority and cap its 2019 budget.
Meanwhile, Mr. Mulvaney is starving the bureau of cash. He requested $0 last quarter from the Federal Reserve, which funds the bureau, and instead drew on a $177 million reserve fund the agency had stockpiled.
He has described some payroll cuts he would like to make.
“I found out yesterday that I’m paying people — it’s amazing what you learn in these places — I’m paying people at the C.F.P.B. to do economics research on climate change,” Mr. Mulvaney said last month at a meeting of state attorneys general. “Not sure how that happened, but we’re going to see if we can’t figure out a way to change that.”
Mr. Mulvaney is scheduled to appear next week before two congressional committees, where Democrats are likely to grill him on his decision to end lawsuits against and investigations of some payday lenders. The agency has initiated no new enforcement actions since Mr. Mulvaney took over.
This week, Mr. Mulvaney repeated his plea for Congress to hamstring the agency — which he called “far too powerful, and with precious little oversight” — by stripping away its funding and rule-making power.
Update: September 2019
Consumer Watchdog Starts Hiring After 15% Staff Drop Under Trump
CFPB chief lifts hiring freeze, as regulator seeks to fill senior positions for enforcement, other areas
WASHINGTON—The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is looking for workers again, following departures during a hiring freeze and budget cuts by Trump administration officials that took over the agency in late 2017.
The consumer-finance agency recently lifted a nearly two-year hiring freeze, according to an internal email reviewed by The Wall Street Journal. It also has accelerated recruiting for senior officials in recent weeks, according to recent public job postings.
“Broadly speaking, the completion of the staffing planning process means: the “hiring freeze” is lifted,” CFPB Director Kathy Kraninger said in an August 15 staff email.
Ms. Kraninger said in her email she wanted to move the bureau “away from the hiring freeze and towards a more sustainable and disciplined practice of identifying and hiring the staff needed to accomplish the bureau’s mission priorities.”
Ms. Kraninger took over the CFPB last December when the freeze and budget reductions were already in place.
The number of employees at the agency, created under the Obama administration after the financial crisis, declined to 1,452 in March, down 15% from the peak of 1,712 in June 2017, according to its financial statements.
Ms. Kraninger said the decision to start hiring reflected the level of staffing deemed necessary to execute the agency’s policy priorities for the next fiscal year starting Oct. 1.
The agency this month posted openings for several senior jobs, including assistant director for enforcement, as well as assistant directors for legislative affairs, and for financial institutions and business liaison.
On August 16, the bureau named Robert Cameron as student loan ombudsman, filling a position left open for a year after Seth Frotman, an Obama-era official, departed while criticizing the Trump administration’s enforcement policies.
Democrats and consumer advocates criticized the appointment of Mr. Cameron, a former executive of a student-loan servicing company, adding to complaints about how long the position was vacant. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a Democratic presidential candidate, said in an August 22 letter to Ms. Kraninger that Mr. Cameron’s appointment was “an outrageous slap in the face of student loan borrowers across the country.”
The CFPB and Mr. Cameron didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.
Mick Mulvaney, Mr. Trump’s acting chief of staff, implemented the hiring freeze in November 2017 when he started serving as interim head of the CFPB. During his one-year CFPB stint, Mr. Mulvaney rolled back several Obama-era policies, curbed enforcement activity and cut its budget.
The bureau spent $553 million in fiscal 2018, which ended Sept. 30, 2018, compared with $593 million the prior fiscal year, which ended before Mr. Mulvaney’s arrival.
So far in the current fiscal year, the agency has initiated 20 investigations, an uptick from a low in the prior fiscal year. The number of new enforcement investigations fell to 15 in fiscal 2018, from 63 in fiscal 2017 and 70 in fiscal 2016, the CFPB said in response to a Freedom of Information Act request.
“Ongoing hiring is important to the agency maintaining a critical mass of staff and to protect current employees from being overburdened,” said Eric Goldberg, an Akerman LLP lawyer who left the CFPB last year after six years. He said the jobs posted recently are “key positions to the functioning of the bureau.”
Ms. Kraninger said the agency plans to let division leaders decide whether to replace departing employees with new hires or to repurpose the position. During the freeze, occasional hirings were made to fill strategic positions, such as director for cost-benefit analysis, a function the Trump administration has emphasized as a way to rein in the cost of regulations.
The bureau’s personnel compensation costs rose 1.6% during fiscal 2018 while staffing fell 9.2% that year, a period when Mr. Mulvaney hired several top aides to help run the bureau.
Few Americans are aware that the judiciary of the United States is accountable to no one. Thomas Jefferson was correct when he said the most ruthless, dishonest and dangerous segment in our government is the unaccountable judiciary. https://t.co/8kMByHi7Ov #AppellateTwitter pic.twitter.com/LHNGvBoQY9
— LawsInTexas (@lawsintexasusa) June 6, 2020
In the Burkes appeal to the 11th Cir. they already put @ocwen and @goodwinlaw on notice that they were acting as one entity, as both @CFPB and https://t.co/LQVLXukxzy were objecting to the homeowners request to intervene.
On appeal OCWEN/CFPB filed separate briefs… Maybe not. pic.twitter.com/GfQmn46A2w
— LawsInTexas (@lawsintexasusa) June 7, 2020