Deutsche Bank

The Quiet Civil Lawsuit Against Paul Mangione of Deutsche Bank Ends With A Typical Fine and No Jail Time

What many seem to have overlooked in this January 17, 2017 Consent Order, was that this agreement was only a mere 3 days before Donald Trump was installed.

U.S. fines former Deutsche Bank subprime chief over alleged mortgage fraud

NOVEMBER 14, 2019

NEW YORK (Reuters) – A former head of subprime trading at Deutsche Bank AG (DBKGn.DE) will pay a $500,000 civil fine to resolve charges he misled investors about the quality of loans backing $1.42 billion of residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) issued before the 2008 financial crisis.

The U.S. Department of Justice on Thursday announced the settlement with Paul Mangione, who was also a former Deutsche Bank managing director, who did not admit wrongdoing. Settlement papers were filed with the federal court in Brooklyn, New York.

Mangione was accused of understating the risks of loans backing two securities offerings, ACE 2007-HE4 and ACE 2007-HE5, in April 2007 and June 2007, including borrowers’ ability to repay and whether the loans were underwritten properly.

More than half the loans were made by Deutsche Bank’s DB Home Lending unit, then known as Chapel Funding.

Mangione had been charged in September 2017 with mail fraud, wire fraud and conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud.

The charges were announced eight months after Deutsche Bank reached a $7.2 billion settlement, including a $3.1 billion civil fine, with the U.S. government, and admitted to misleading investors about RMBS it sold (Deutsche Bank has since cancelled this agreement).

Other banks have reached similar settlements. U.S. authorities have long faced criticism that they have not held enough individuals accountable for RMBS failures.

Mangione joined Deutsche Bank in 2000 after six years at Credit Suisse (CSGN.S). His lawyer, Patrick Smith, said Mangione settled so he could devote his time and energy elsewhere.

“Mr. Mangione did nothing wrong during his time at Deutsche Bank,” Smith said in a statement. “He acted in good faith in performing his customary job functions as a whole loan trader at Deutsche Bank. Mr. Mangione was not responsible for Deutsche Bank’s RMBS practices and disclosures to investors, which were at the core of the government’s claims against him.”

COURT ORDER RE $500K FINE AND NO JAIL TIME FOR MORTGAGE LENDING ABUSES

AGREEMENT FOR COMPROMISE SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE

This Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into between Plaintiff the United States of America (“United States”) and Defendant Paul Mangione (“Mangione”). The United States and Mangione are collectively referred to herein as “the Parties” to the above-captioned civil action (“this Action”).

RECITALS

A. On September 11, 2017, the United States commenced this Action against Mangione by filing a Complaint to recover civil penalties from Mangione pursuant to the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (“FIRREA”), Pub. L. No. 101-73, 103 Stat. 498, tit. IX,§ 951, codified as amended at 12 U.S.C. 1833a.

B. The Complaint alleges that between April 11, 2007 and June 27, 2007 (the “Relevant Period”), Mangione engaged in violations of predicate offenses under FIRREA in connection with two residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”), ACE 2007-HE4 and ACE 2007-HES, issued by Deutsche Bank 1 The Complaint asserts claims for civil penalties under FIRREA against Mangione as to these securitizations (“the Subject Deals”).

C. Mangione filed a motion to dismiss the Complaint, and the United States opposed this motion. The motion to dismiss has not yet been adjudicated and is still pending before the Court.

D. “Covered Conduct” as used herein 1s defined as the conduct alleged in the Complaint, as well as, more broadly:

a. the creation, pooling, structuring, sponsorship, arranging, formation, packaging, marketing, underwriting, sale, or issuance of RMBS by Deutsche Bank prior to January 1, 2009, including but not limited to the Subject Deals; and

b. the representations, disclosures, or non-disclosures by Mangione to RMBS investors and rating agencies made in connection with the activities set forth above, where the representation, disclosure, or non-disclosure involves information about (or obtained during the origination, purchase, acquisition, securitization, underwriting, or servicing of) residential mortgage

E. Covered Conduct does not include:

a. conduct relating to the origination of residential mortgages, except for representations, disclosures, or non-disclosures by Mangione about the origination of such loans, or about information obtained in the course of originating such loans;

b. conduct relating to the serv1cmg of residential mortgage loans, except representations, disclosures, or non-disclosures by Mangione about the servicing of such loans, or about information obtained in the course of servicing such loans; or

c. conduct relating to collateralized debt obligations and other derivative securities, or to the secondary trading of RMBS, as well as representations, disclosures, or non-disclosures made in connection therewith, except to the extent that such conduct, representations, disclosures, or non-disclosures relate to the Subject Deals.

F. All Parties desire to bring this matter to an expeditious and mutually acceptable resolution so as to avoid the delay, uncertainty, inconvenience, and expense of further litigation.

G. The Parties have therefore determined and decided to enter into this Agreement, in mutual consideration of the promises, covenants, and obligations set forth below.

H. This Agreement is made in compromise of disputed claims. The Paiiies acknowledge that this Agreement is made without any trial or adjudication or judicial finding of any issue of fact or law, and is not a final order of any court or governmental authority.

This Agreement does not constitute an admission by Mangione of any facts or liability or wrongdoing, including, but not limited to, any liability or wrongdoing with respect to any allegations that were or could have been raised in this Action.

This Agreement also does not constitute a concession by the United States that its claims are not well-founded, and nothing in this Agreement should be construed as, or deemed to constitute, approval, sanction, or authorization by the United States of any of Mangione’ s actions or business practices, or of any event or action alleged in the Complaint.

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

1. Payment.

a. Mangione agrees to pay the amount of five-hundred-thousand dollars (US$500,000) to resolve the claims against him brought in this Action.

b. Within fifteen (15) business days of receiving written payment processing instructions from the United States Attorney’s Office, the entire amount set forth above in paragraphs 1.a (known hereafter as the “Settlement Amount”) shall be paid by electronic funds transfer to the United States.

c. The entirety of the Settlement Amount is a civil monetary penalty recovered pursuant to FIRREA, 12 U.S.C. § 1833a.

d. Each Party shall bear its own legal and other costs, fees, and expenses incurred in connection with this Action, including those incurred in the preparation and performance of this Agreement.

2. Voluntary Dismissal. Within two (2) business days after the United States Attorney’s Office confirms receipt of payment of the full Settlement Amount, and in consideration of such payment, the Parties shall execute and file in the District Court for the Eastern District of New York a Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, which shall dismiss with prejudice all claims in this Action in their entirety against Mangione.

However, the Stipulation and Protective Order entered by the Court on May 30, 2018 (ECF No. 24), shall survive the dismissal of this Action to the extent necessary to govern the return or destruction of documents that the Parties or any non-Parties have designated as Confidential FIRREA Material or Confidential Information, and the Patties shall cooperate with each other to effectuate the terms of those Stipulations.

3. Releases by the United States. Subject to the exceptions set forth in Paragraph 4 (“Excluded Claims”), in consideration for and conditioned upon Mangione’s full and timely payment of the Settlement Amount, the United States fully and finally releases Mangione from all claims that were or could have been asserted by Plaintiff the United States in this Action, as well as any other civil claim the United States has against Mangione for the Covered Conduct, where such civil claim arises under:

a. FIRREA, 12 U.S.C. § 1833a;

b. the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729, et seq.;

c. the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3801, et seq.;

d. the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961, et seq.;

e. the Injunctions Against Fraud Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1345;

f. common law theories of negligence, gross negligence, payment by mistake, unjust enrichment, money had and received, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, misrepresentation, deceit, fraud, and aiding and abetting any of the foregoing; and

g. any other claim that the Civil Division of the Department of Justice has actual and present authority to assert and compromise pursuant to 28 CFR § 0.45(d).

4. Reservations by the United States (Excluded Claims). Notwithstanding the Releases by the United States set forth in Paragraph 3, and notwithstanding any other term of this Agreement, the United States specifically reserves, and does not release Mangione from, the following claims, regardless of the relationship of such claims to the Covered Conduct:

a. any criminal liability;

b. any liability of any person or entity other than Mangione;

c. individual liability of any person except Mangione;

d. any liability arising under Title 26 of the United States Code (the Internal Revenue Code);

e. any administrative liability, including the suspension and debarment rights of any federal agency, establishment, instrumentality, or corporation; and

f. any liability based upon obligations created by this Agreement.

5. Clarification of Excluded Claims. For the avoidance of doubt, nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as suggesting that the United States Department of Justice has the authority to release, or by this Agreement is releasing:

a. any private right of action that entities other than the United States may have against Mangione, regardless whether such claims have been asserted or not; or

b. any liability to or claims of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) (in its capacity as a corporation, receiver, or conservator), National Credit Union Administration (in its capacity as a corporation, receiver, or conservator), Federal H_ ousing Finance Agency, any of the Federal Home Loan Banks, the Federal Reserve Board and its member institutions, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the Securities & Exchange Commission (“SEC”), or the Federal Trade Commission.

6. Releases and Waivers by Mangione.

a. Mangione hereby irrevocably releases the United States, its agencies, establishments, and instrumentalities, together with their respective officers, officials, agents, employees, and servants, from any and all claims (including claims for attorney’s fees, costs, and expenses of every kind), however denominated, that Mangione has asserted, could have asserted, or may assert in the future against the United States, its agencies, establishments, instrumentalities, officers, officials, agents, employees, and servants, related to the Covered Conduct or related to the investigation and litigation thereof.

b. Mangione hereby irrevocably waives, and agree not to assert, any rights that he otherwise might have to seek any form of indemnification, reimbursement, or contribution from the FDIC in any capacity, for any payment that is a portion of the Settlement Amount.

c. Mangione hereby irrevocably waives and agrees not to assert any defenses that he may have to any criminal prosecution or administrative action relating to the Covered Conduct as to which the defense is based in whole or in part on a contention that, under the Double Jeopardy Clause in the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, or under the Excessive Fines Clause in the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution, this Agreement bars a remedy sought in such criminal prosecution or administrative action.

d. Mangione hereby agrees to separately determine and account for all Unallowable Costs for government contracting purposes, and not to charge any Unallowable Costs, directly or indirectly, to any contract that he may have with the United States, or with any agency, establishment, or instrumentality of the United States. For purposes of this provision, an “Unallowable Cost” is any cost (as defined in the Federal Acquisition Regulation, 48 C.F.R. § 31.205-47) incurred by or on behalf of in connection with: any matters covered by this Agreement; the negotiation and performance of this Agreement; the Settlement Amount payments made pursuant to this Agreement; the litigation and settlement of this Action, including any attorney ‘ s fees and costs; the United States’ investigation of any matters covered by this Agreement; and Mangione’s investigation, defense, and corrective actions undertaken in response to the United States’ investigation and litigation of any matters covered by this Agreement.

8. Miscellaneous Provisions.

a. This Agreement is governed by, and shall be construed according to, the laws of the United States.

b. The Parties agree that the exclusive jurisdiction and venue for any dispute relating to this Agreement or its construction is the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, and fmiher agree to submit to the jurisdiction of that court (including personal jurisdiction) for any dispute relating to this Agreement or its construction or enforcement, as well as for any dispute relating to the Stipulation and Protective Order entered by the Comt on April 30, 2018 (ECF No. 24).

c. This Agreement is intended for the benefit of the Patties only and does not create any third-paity rights.

d. The undersigned represent and warrant that they are fully authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of the persons and entities indicated below. Each Party and signatory to this Agreement represents that it/he/she freely and voluntarily enters into this Agreement without any degree of duress or compulsion.

e. This Agreement shall be deemed to have been drafted by all Parties and shall not, therefore, be construed against any Paity for that reason in any dispute.

f. This Agreement constitutes the complete and entire agreement between the Parties and may not be amended except by written consent of all of the Parties.

g. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which constitutes an original and all of which constitute one and the same Agreement. Facsimiles of signatures shall constitute acceptable, binding signatures for purposes of this Agreement.

h. This Agreement is binding on Mangione’s successors, transferees, heirs,and assigns.

9. Disclosure. All Parties agree that this Agreement may be made public in its entirety, and expressly consent to such release and disclosure.

10. Effective Date. This Agreement shall take effect on the date of signature of the last signatory to the Agreement.

Court Order Dated 13th Nov. 2019 (The same day of  the commencement of President Trump’s Impeachment Hearing – a suitable distraction)

Update August 24, 2019

It’s exactly 2 months since the last posted document, a letter from Mayer Brown complaining to the Judge. No further movement in the case has been recorded.

“Screw Payin’, the Don Owes Us.”

That 7.2 Billion Dollar relief was to run until 2022 but Deutsche Bank CANCELLED the fine…yes, that’s right, former Attorney General Loretta Lynch said the Bank was to be held “accountable”for its abuse of homeowners and consumers and the fine represented that statement…hmmm, well, okay…that went well.

In 2017, the government chose to sue Paul Mangione of Deutsche Bank. In typical secret service fashion, there is no picture on the internet for this bad, yet powerful man, Hitler would be impressed with the modern technology and search engine compliance with banks and government to control what people see and read.

The Department of Justice filed civil suit in a Federal Court in Brooklyn against Paul Mangione, the man who had headed Deutsche Bank’s subprime mortgage trading, alleging that he “systematically and intentionally” misled investors about the quality of the mortgages underlying two separate bonds he sold. Over 75% of the loans underlying those bonds ultimately defaulted.

The move is exceptional: there have been virtually no prosecutions or civil suits against decision-making executives over the last 10 years. Hardly anyone has gone to jail for a series of frauds that, as former Attorney-General Loretta Lynch said, not only misled investors but “contributed directly to an international financial crisis.” Instead, the banks themselves have paid tens of billions of dollars to settle charges of fraud brought by the DoJ. The $7.2 billion agreement by Mangione’s employer earlier in 2017 was one of the biggest.

However, that agreement was short-lived, Deutsche Bank subsequently gave the US government and the homeowners who  were entitled to relief, two pointed fingers. Nothing was said and nothing has been done since.

Prosecutors argue in the filing that Mangione knew that the mortgages originated by Californian lender Chapel Funding LLC and resold by Deutsche were “crap.” When Deutsche’s diligence director informed him in detail about their defects, he had replied that “knew all that,” and later told others that Deutsche should “f***ing fire all those guys at Chapel,” and that “the guys at Chapel should be arrested for the s**t they were doing,” according to the complaint.

Reuters quoted Mangione’s lawyers as saying that “Mr. Mangione is being singled out for blame on two ten-year old securitization transactions on which numerous other participants had more input and responsibility.”

Whether the DoJ intends to go after any other individuals in the subprime scandal isn’t clear. The narrative arc of the subprime scandal was such that any banker selling such bonds likely had an epiphany similar to Mangione’s at some stage between 2006 and 2008. The difficulty, from a prosecutor’s point of view, has been in proving ex ante knowledge of fraud.

Chad Readler, an acting assistant attorney-general in the DoJ’s Civil Division, said in the DoJ’s press release that it “will continue to pursue those who engage in fraud as a way to conduct business,” but that statement appears to be directed more at future misdeeds than past ones.

The U.S. is seeking financial penalties and a jury trial, according to the filing.

It’s now nearly 2 years later, July 2019, and the case is plodding on and the press is again eerily silent after the initial fanfare in 2017.

United States v. Mangione (E.D.N.Y 2017)

 

 September 11th, 2017

 

 
 

 

 

 
 

What many seem to have overlooked in this January 17, 2017 Consent Order, was that this agreement was only a mere 3 days before Donald Trump was installed.

Our Justice Department, Deutsche Bank and ACE Securities Corp entered into the agreement for their role in the subprime loans, destabilization of our economy and housing market that factored in to the “Great Recession of 2008”.

Specifically after years of investigation by the FTC, the Federal Reserve (the Fed), the New York Department of Financial Services (NY DFS) found that Deutsche Bank and it’s successors engaged in a protracted game of financial subterfuge and nearly brought the worldwide financial markets to its knees.

More Deutsche Bank Traders Found Guilty of Fraud. But Wait, Sentence is Probably Going to Be Home Confinement

A federal jury in Chicago, after three days of deliberations, concluded Chanu and Vorley made bogus trade orders between 2008 and 2013 to illegally influence precious-metals prices.

Deutsche Bank Quietly Settles Big Lawsuits in New York (Just after the Italian Convictions)

In total, Deutsche Bank and FTN have agreed to pay a total of $29.5 million into a settlement fund.

Deutsche Bank Q2 Earnings – Analyst Not Impressed: “With no upside but lots of downside risks, this isn’t a share I’ll be buying anytime soon.”

Deutsche Bank – Q2 Earnings: The Mountain Just Got Bigger. 2Q earnings were greeted with another 5% share price fall. Quarterly results are arguably a side-show for Deutsche Bank as the focus shifts to the new 2022 financial targets and restructuring. But much weaker than expected revenues are still a bad omen for a strategy that relies heavily on revenue growth.

The Quiet Civil Lawsuit Against Paul Mangione of Deutsche Bank Ends With A Typical Fine and No Jail Time
1 Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Laws In Texas is a blog about the Financial Crisis and how the banks and government are colluding against the citizens and homeowners of the State of Texas and relying on a system of #FakeDocs and post-crisis legal precedents, specially created by the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to foreclose on homeowners around this great State. We are not lawyers. We do not offer legal advice. We are citizens of the State of Texas who have spent a decade in the court system in Texas and have been party to during this period to the good, the bad and the very ugly.

Donate to LawsInTexas. Make a Difference.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

We keep your data private and share your data only with third parties that make this service possible. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

© 2020-21 LawInTexas com is an online trading name which is wholly owned by Blogger Inc., a nonprofit 501(c)(3) registered in Delaware. | All Rights Reserved.

To Top