202205419
FOREMAN, BYRON vs. CHRISTIAN CONSULTANTS OF TEXAS LLC
(Court 334, JUDGE DAWN ROGERS)
JAN 27, 2022 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: OCT 2, 2022
FOREMAN, BYRON vs. HUNTER-KELSEY
(First Amended Complaint, after ‘HIS’ CORRUPT LAWYER, ROBERT CLAYTON “CLAY” VILT dropped CCTX, for reasons we all know – they work TOGETHER, filed Sep. 16, 2022)
This isn’t a lawsuit by Byron Foreman, this is a lawsuit merely to DELAY foreclosure by bandit lawyers who are deeply involved in a Foreclosure Scam which;
(i) has been going on since the Greatest Theft of Residential Homes in American History (post 2008),
and;
(ii) has the approval of both the State and Federal Judiciary in Texas.
The fact that ‘Byron’s lawyer’, Rogue Houston attorney Clay Vilt non-suited CCTX, (represented by Bandit Turncoat Texas lawyer Jason LeBoeuf) is now only pursuing the tax/loan company in his amended complaint below, is a sham.
Compare the original complaint with affidavit of Foreman and includes the allegedly forged Special Warranty Deed, to the September 2022 amended complaint – enough said.
Hunter-Kelsey provided a loan and it appears they may have been difficult to deal with, however, it was only when CCTX and legal counsel appeared that a serious fraud was executed.
It’s a sham filing as CCTX, Vilt and Leboeuf are the real criminals in this civil action, and that’s sad for Byron Foreman, the real victim here. The case is still live – and that’s over 8 months since the lawsuit was filed – the DELAY is working.
We’ve explained how the Foreclosure Scam Squad operates, which is mirrored by Christian Consultants of Texas (CCTX) in prior articles and if you are unfamiliar with the fraud, we suggest you read them.
The only legal filing that should be happening is a federal criminal indictment of all these lawyers and judges who are aware of this fraudulent transfer scheme and have facilitated the ongoing crime(s).
BEWARE When You Attend Church: #SundayThoughts
Who Are Christian Consultants of Texas, the “We Save Homes, We Buy Houses” Equity-Stripping Scammers? https://t.co/tJGp9DyVG3 pic.twitter.com/gcpGt6QEPl
— lawsinusa (@lawsinusa) October 2, 2022
FOREMAN, BYRON vs. CHRISTIAN CONSULTANTS OF TEXAS LLC
(Original Complaint, with CCTX and Exhibits, inc. Affidavit and Special Warranty Deed Fraud, filed Jan. 27 2022)
202205419
FOREMAN, BYRON vs. CHRISTIAN CONSULTANTS OF TEXAS LLC
(Court 334, JUDGE DAWN ROGERS)
JAN 27, 2022 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: OCT 2, 2022
“In rem only” refers to a legal action or proceeding that is directed solely against a property itself, rather than against any particular individual. In such cases, the legal action is focused on resolving issues related to the property’s ownership, status, or rights, rather than targeting any specific person or entity.
For example, a foreclosure proceeding may be pursued in rem, where the focus is on the property itself and reclaiming it due to default on a mortgage, rather than suing individual borrowers for repayment.
“In rem only” actions are commonly used in various legal contexts, including property law, bankruptcy proceedings, and certain types of civil litigation where the primary concern is the property’s status or rights. It’s important to note that in an in rem action, the property is considered the defendant, and any judgment or resolution typically affects the property rather than individuals directly.