Intervenor Plaintiffs seek to modify the protective order so that they can access materials produced by Ocwen in this case - granted.
Ocwens' Consent Judgment had two sets of obligations: complying with federal and state law, and complying with the fencing-in provisions.
Even under a traditional res judicata approach, Marra appropriately considered the terms of the Consent Judgment. CFPB’s claims are barred.
Judge Marra's analysis of the res judicata effect of the Consent Judgment using traditional principles shows that method is inappropriate.
The final phase of the company’s loan transfer process involved migrating from REALServicing to the Black Knight LoanSphere MSP platform.
Complaint: Ocwen has and continues to conceal the source, nature, and extent of the mishandling of the Loan while making material misrepresentations...
Class Action lawyer James Kauffman attempted to intervene in a similar case in Fl, Morris v. PHH Mortgage Corporation (0:20-cv-60633), District Court,...
After PHH Ocwen decided not to settle with the Kaufmann Group - the lawyer group now wants in on this case, the...
U.S. District Judge Corrigan admits that there is a split in Florida federal courts re convenience fees assessed against OCWEN borrowers.
Florida Plaintiffs argue Count V attempts to hold Ocwen liable for knowingly maintaining and relying on REALServicing to its own benefit and...
After careful review, we find that none of Ocwen’s statements rises to the level of an actionable misrepresentation of material fact. Some...
On September 10, 2019, California federal judge, U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, entered a $267 million judgment against a debt collection...