The Due Process Clause requires recusal whenever there is an unconstitutional “probability” or “potential” for bias. Rippo v. Baker.
This latest bench slap is more of a punch against the citizens of America, who deserve independent oversight of the crooked judiciary.
Judicial recusal doctrines raise structural, not substantive, considerations. They serve to protect the parties basic right to a fair trial.
The Burkes fight for democracy and honest judges is not insular, and like the current Ukraine-Russian war, it affects millions of citizens.
Judge Gilstrap has taken on 138 cases since 2011 involving companies in which he had a financial interest, more than any other...
Bias; The individual and extrajudicial knowledge on the part of the judge will not dispense with proof of facts not judicially cognizable.
Abuse of Discretion: The scope of the district court’s discretion is narrower when the Rule 41(b) dismissal is with prejudice says 5th...
No [wo]man in this country is so high that [s]he is above the law. No officer of the law may set that...
The failure to consider objective standards requiring judicial recusal is not consistent with the imperatives of due process.
Judge Jill Pryor apparently recused herself AFTER oral argument, however, apart from a footnote in the final 2-panel opinion, there is nothing...
How does the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit deals with Pro Se Appeals? It requires appeal to be glossed over...
A pro se author, Benjamin Vient, convinced the 3-panel at the Eleventh Circuit to revive his copyright infringement lawsuit against a Florida...