All posts tagged "harassment"
-
257First AmendmentMeanwhile in Michigan the Court of Appeals Reverses Protection Order: It’s Not Harassment or Stalking
Speech over the Internet is constitutionally protected to the same extent as speech over other media, and includes unwelcome speech.
-
966Fifth CircuitChief Judge Richman Owen Hecht Dissented in Free Speech, Free Press Case. It’s Now En Banc
Ochlocracy from the Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir.“Wouldn’t judges know more than police officers do?” Judge Catharina Haynes asked.
-
851BDF HopkinsBDF Hopkins Response Deemed Legally Incompetent by Burke in Reply in Support of Rule 59(e) Motion
If the law and Const. is applied correctly by an impartial judiciary who follow the rule of law it should have no...
-
930BDF HopkinsThe Bounty Hunters, BDF Hopkins Response to Rule 59(e) Motion Re Burke
Burke v PHH Ocwen, Hopkins Law, PLLC, Mark Hopkins and Shelley Hopkins before Bent Judge Al Bennett, SDTX, Houston.
-
1.2KAppellate JudgesOn Appeal, Law Firm Who Unlawfully Obtained Harassment Prevention Order from Judge is Vacated as Protected Speech
The defendant appeals from the extension of a harassment prevention order issued against her under G. L. c. 258E. We vacate the...
-
1.1KAppellate JudgesOn Return from the 8th Cir., Chief Judge Beth Phillips Denies Motion for Sanctions by Texas Attorney
The Chief Judge: Should it be established that Mycroft have engaged in the misconduct described, the Court will respond quite harshly.
-
1.0KAppellate JudgesJudge Removed for Bias and Allowing Conversion of Courtroom Conference Without Due Notice
Comparing the Honorable Eighth Cir. opinion with the Judicial Outlaws at the Fifth Cir. and Eleventh Cir. shows not all Judges lie...
-
908Federal JudgesNebraska Judge Takes Issue with State Government’s Harassment Against a Citizen to Chill Free Speech
All of the people involved with this lawsuit should regret being here. The Court finds its attention diverted to referee this squabble.
-
1.2KBankersTexas Federal Chief Judge Refuses to Label 18 Year Pro Se’s as Vexatious Litigants
This is the Pro Se's ninth lawsuit involving the foreclosure of the Property and third lawsuit against the Attorney Defendant Barrett Daffin.
-
1.0KAppellate CircuitHopkins Judgment on the Pleadings versus Hopkins Fraudulent Documents and Criminal Behavior
What is a motion for judgment on the pleadings and why are they disfavored by federal court judges? Answer: Because most are...
-
868Appellate JudgesWho’s Lyin’ Again in Federal Court? Hopkins Law, PLLC, Austin, Texas, Of Course
Plaintiffs request court take notice of the verified falsity and perjury of Shelley Hopkins, who submitted this ‘Joint’ Plan for Defendants.
-
929TexasThis Ain’t a Reply Hopkins, It’s a Begging Letter for Felonious Judicial Protection
The Pro Se's response with citations has blown Hopkins Law PLLC's failed arguments out of the water so they opt for a...
-
1.6KBankersThe Ten Sins by Hopkins Law
Admitted serial liar Mark Hopkins, along with Shelley Hopkins of Hopkins Law, PLLC continue their premeditated legal frauds and schematics.
-
1.2KAccelerationTexas Federal Judiciary Collaborate with Unlicensed Debt Collectors to File Vexatious Litigant Motions to Clear Docket
Chief Judge Lee Rosenthal denied label of 'Vexatious Litigant' with at least 9 foreclosure filings spanning 18 years, including 6 since 2017.
-
1.1KBankersBowder v PHH Mortgage Corporation is Another Harassment Complaint
Plaintiffs were unduly inconvenienced and harassed by PHH’s unlawful attempts to collect the discharged subject debt.
-
1.1KBankersSydnor v PHH Mortgage Corporation is Another Harassment Complaint
Post-Discharge 12 Yrs Ago and After the First Lawsuit Settled, PHH and OCWEN Continue Making Harassing and Coercive Contacts with Plaintiff.
-
739BankersThe IRS Should Audit this Non-Profit, Proposition 8 Legal Defense Fund
We live in a violent land according to Proposition 8 Legal Defense Fund. That should be sufficient for a complete exemption for...
-
2.8KAppellate JudgesFifth Circuit Judge Graves Authors 3-Panel Opinion with Mandate to Unseal Records, Reversing Lower Court
The district court reasoned that sealing was justified because of "the child's privacy interest in being protected from financial predators or others...
