The significant and distressing difference is the Burkes battle is not just with the opposing parties, but with the judicial machinery itself.
What is interesting about this case is BDF Hopkins lack of vitriol in their cross-complaint against these 8 year defaulting homeowners.
Ms. Aleta R. Chapman of Fort Bend claims Shellpoint breached the deed of trust by failing to provide proper notice of the...
The U.S. Department of Justice said that it has withdrawn from a settlement inked last year with the National Association of Realtors.
Appellant prays this Court vacate the void judgments for lack of subject matter jurisdiction in the interest of justice and due process.
LIT is delighted to see the State's Fifth Court of Appeals taking on Wall St. The question is will the opinion be...
Why? Because it's big money. There is no mention of Albright calling a foreclosure mill to ask them to submit an affidavit...
Using the date of filing of the Foreclosure Action, or the date that service was made on Plaintiff, Plaintiff's FDCPA claims are...
After LIT exposed the failure of corrupt federal judges to disclose their financial conflicts and recuse from cases, WSJ took up the...
Chase Berger removed a Texas state case and 3 days later files a Motion to Dismiss. But, there's no Pro Hac Vice,...
Initial Conference brought forward from Jan 2022 to 11/29/2021 at 11:00 AM in Room 11122 before Judge Lynn N Hughes.
LIT's foreclosure tracker is watchin' Robert F. Strange versus Deutsche Bank National Trust Company before Judge Eskridge in SDTX.
Judge Hanks is now issuing residential mortgage protocols and automatic protective orders in foreclosure cases since LIT started tracking.
Judge Hanks is now issuing automatic protective orders in foreclosure cases since LIT started highlighting these cases.
Accusations of a fraudulent financial scheme and false statements to where did the PPP funds actually go are questions which need answered.
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company was an unsecured creditor when the banks failed in 2008. Now it's a fraudulent vehicle for the...
The Court finds that it should award Plaintiffs $1,000.00 in statutory damages, $9,000 in punitive damages, attorney fees and expenses.
Engagement of Attorneys allowed Plaintiffs to submit a feasible plan, disburse a total of $105, 877.52 to creditors and receive a discharge.