Ocwens' Consent Judgment had two sets of obligations: complying with federal and state law, and complying with the fencing-in provisions.
Even under a traditional res judicata approach, Marra appropriately considered the terms of the Consent Judgment. CFPB’s claims are barred.
Judge Marra's analysis of the res judicata effect of the Consent Judgment using traditional principles shows that method is inappropriate.
Andrew Lehman and Michael Carrigan haven't got $30k never mind $3 million and that's why its a fully suspended payment. It's a...
By 2011, Flagstar Bank FSB had 13,000 active loss mitigation applications versus 25 full-time employees in the loss mitigation department and a...
In the words of CFPB Director Richard Cordray, These wolves in sheep’s clothing [lawyers] take money from consumers who are already struggling...
Our lawsuit asserts that consumers were harassed, threatened, and deceived as part of a reprehensible scheme to collect debt that was not...
On March 12, 2019 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit heard oral argument in All American Check Cashing’s interlocutory...