Bounty Hunters

Rosas v. PHH Mortgage Corporation and AltaSource Offshore Customer Service

Ocwen Financial: Renamed Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC to PHH Mortgage Corporation. And, Altisource to Altasource equals Cheap Customer Service.

Rosas v. PHH Mortgage Corporation

(4:23-cv-01661)

District Court, S.D. Texas

MAY 4, 2023 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: SEP 18, 2023
SEP 18, OCT 5, 18, NOV 1, 13 2023
JAN 29, MAR 8, 2024

Above is the date LIT Last updated this article.

Despite no TRO or Application for a Temporary Injunction for nearly a year, PHH did not auction home via non-judicial foreclosure.

Stipulation of Dismissal, with prejudice to refiling.

Answer to Complaint

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge George C Hanks, Jr. MOTION HEARING held on 10/31/2023.

Defendants motion to dismiss Dkt. 14 is DENIED without prejudice to being reasserted as a motion for summary judgment.

Appearances: Jeffrey Scott Kelly. Stephanie Sepulveda. (ERO: yes), filed. (ByronThomas, 4) (Entered: 11/01/2023)

U.S. District Court
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS (Houston)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 4:23-cv-01661

Rosas et al v. PHH Mortgage Corporation
Assigned to: Judge George C Hanks, Jr

Case in other court:  133rd JD Houston, 202325126

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal

Date Filed: 05/04/2023
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 220 Real Property: Foreclosure
Jurisdiction: Diversity

 

Date Filed # Docket Text
10/27/2023 21 NOTICE of Setting re: 14 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Original Complaint. Parties notified. Motion Hearing set for 10/31/2023 at 10:30 AM by video before Judge George C Hanks Jr, filed. (ByronThomas, 4) (Entered: 10/27/2023)
10/31/2023 22 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge George C Hanks, Jr. MOTION HEARING held on 10/31/2023. Defendants motion to dismiss Dkt. 14 is DENIED without prejudice to being reasserted as a motion for summary judgment. Appearances: Jeffrey Scott Kelly. Stephanie Sepulveda. (ERO: yes), filed. (ByronThomas, 4) (Entered: 11/01/2023)

 


 

PACER Service Center
Transaction Receipt
11/13/2023 15:18:30

Notice of Setting/Resetting (FORM, noticing) – Civil

Zoom hearing Oct. 31, no update on docket as at this time.

Scheduling Conference

DOCKET CONTROL ORDER

U.S. District Court
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS (Houston)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 4:23-cv-01661

Rosas et al v. PHH Mortgage Corporation
Assigned to: Judge George C Hanks, Jr

Case in other court:  133rd JD Houston, 202325126

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal

Date Filed: 05/04/2023
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 220 Real Property: Foreclosure
Jurisdiction: Diversity
Plaintiff
Juan Rosas represented by Christian Adrian Davila
Law Office of Christian Davila
5310 Marcella Ave.
Suite #69
Laredo, TX 78041
9569996545
Email: attorneychristiandavila@gmail.com
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICEDJeffrey Scott Kelly
The Kelly Legal Group PLLC
PO Box 2125
Austin, TX 78768-2125
512-505-0053
Fax: 512-505-0054
Email: jkelly@kellylegalgroup.com
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICEDRobert Savage
Robert Savage
PO Box 12548
Austin, TX 78711
512-936-1446
Fax: 512-499-0712
Email: robertssavage@gmail.com
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Plaintiff
Maria Rosas represented by Christian Adrian Davila
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICEDJeffrey Scott Kelly
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICEDRobert Savage
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
V.
Defendant
PHH Mortgage Corporation represented by Adam Ross Nunnallee
Dykema Gossett PLLC
1717 Main Street
Suite 4200
Dallas, TX 75201
(214) 462-6453
Fax: (214) 462-6401
Email: ANunnallee@dykema.com
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICEDStephanie Sepulveda
Dykema Gossett, PLLC
1401 McKinney St., Suie 1625
Houston, TX 77010
956-220-7129
Email: ssepulveda@dykema.com
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

 

Date Filed # Docket Text
05/04/2023 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 133rd JD of Harris County, case number 2023-25126 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-29864112) filed by PHH Mortgage Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Index of State Court Related Documents (Cause No. 2023-25126), # 2 Exhibit A – Copy of Docket Sheet for Cause 2023-25126, # 3 Exhibit A-1 Original Petition and App for TRO, # 4 Exhibit A-2 Exhibit 1 to Original Petition, # 5 Exhibit A-3 Exhibit 2 to Original Petition, # 6 Exhibit A-4 Exhibit 3 to Original Petition, # 7 Exhibit A-5 Exhibit 4 to Original Petition, # 8 Exhibit A-6 Exhibit 5 to Original Petition, # 9 Exhibit A-7 Exhibit 6 to Original Petition, # 10 Exhibit A-8 Exhibit 7 to Original Petition, # 11 Exhibit A-9 Exhibit 8 to Original Petition, # 12 Exhibit A-10 Exhibit 9 to Original Petition, # 13 Exhibit A-11 Filing Letter, # 14 Exhibit A-12 Temporary Restraining Order, # 15 Exhibit A-13 TRO and Order Setting Hearing for TI, # 16 Exhibit A-14 Notice of Hearing, # 17 Exhibit A-15 Clerk’s Certificate of Cash Deposit in Lieu of Injunction Bond per Order of Court, # 18 Exhibit B – Harris County Appraisal, # 19 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Nunnallee, Adam) (Entered: 05/04/2023)
05/04/2023 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by PHH Mortgage Corporation, filed.(Nunnallee, Adam) (Entered: 05/04/2023)
05/05/2023 3 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 9/6/2023 at 09:00 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(AkeitaMichael, 4) (Entered: 05/05/2023)
05/08/2023 4 ORDER on Initial Discovery Protocols for Residential Mortgage Cases.(Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(KimberlyPicota, 4) (Entered: 05/08/2023)
05/08/2023 5 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(KimberlyPicota, 4) (Entered: 05/08/2023)
05/09/2023 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephanie Sepulveda on behalf of PHH Mortgage Corporation, filed. (Sepulveda, Stephanie) (Entered: 05/09/2023)
05/11/2023 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time Answer or Otherwise Plead to Plaintiff’s Original Petition by PHH Mortgage Corporation, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/1/2023. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Granting Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead to Plaintiffs’ Original Petition)(Nunnallee, Adam) (Entered: 05/11/2023)
05/11/2023 8 Unopposed MOTION for Pre-Motion Conference re: 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time Answer or Otherwise Plead to Plaintiff’s Original Petition by PHH Mortgage Corporation, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/1/2023. (Nunnallee, Adam) (Entered: 05/11/2023)
05/11/2023 9 ORDER granting 7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead to Plaintiff’s Original Petition. (Answer due 5/25/2023 for PHH Mortgage Corporation). (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified. (bthomas, 4) (Entered: 05/11/2023)
05/22/2023 10 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Juan Rosas, Maria Rosas, filed.(Savage, Robert) (Entered: 05/22/2023)
05/26/2023 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead to Plaintiffs’ Original Petition by PHH Mortgage Corporation, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/16/2023. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Granting Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead to Plaintiffs’ Original Petition)(Nunnallee, Adam) (Entered: 05/26/2023)
05/26/2023 12 Unopposed REQUEST for pre-motion conference re: 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead to Plaintiffs’ Original Petition, filed.(Nunnallee, Adam) (Entered: 05/26/2023)
05/30/2023 13 ORDER granting 11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead to Plaintiffs’ Original Petition. (Answer due 6/9/2023 for PHH Mortgage Corporation). (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(bthomas, 4) (Entered: 05/30/2023)
06/09/2023 14 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Original Complaint by PHH Mortgage Corporation, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/30/2023. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting MTD)(Sepulveda, Stephanie) (Entered: 06/09/2023)
06/15/2023 15 LETTER OF AGREEMENT re: Request a pre-motion telephonic conference by PHH Mortgage Corporation, filed.(Sepulveda, Stephanie) (Entered: 06/15/2023)
06/30/2023 16 RESPONSE in Opposition to 14 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Original Complaint, filed by Juan Rosas, Maria Rosas. (Savage, Robert) (Entered: 06/30/2023)
07/07/2023 17 REPLY to 16 Response in Opposition to Motion , filed by PHH Mortgage Corporation. (Sepulveda, Stephanie) (Entered: 07/07/2023)
08/16/2023 18 JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by PHH Mortgage Corporation, filed.(Sepulveda, Stephanie) (Entered: 08/16/2023)
08/18/2023 19 DESIGNATION of Jeffrey S. Kelly as attorney in charge of Juan Rosas, filed.(Kelly, Jeffrey) (Entered: 08/18/2023)
09/06/2023 20 DOCKET CONTROL ORDER. ETT: 3 days. Pltf Expert Witness List due by 2/2/2024. Pltf Expert Report due by 2/2/2024. Deft Expert Witness List due by 3/1/2024. Deft Expert Report due by 3/1/2024. Discovery due by 4/19/2024. Dispositive Motion Filing due by 4/26/2024. Non-Dispositive Motion Filing due by 6/14/2024. Joint Pretrial Order and Motions in Limine due by 8/2/2024. Docket Call set for 8/9/2024 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 9C before Judge George C Hanks Jr(Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison) Parties notified.(AndyGould, 3) (Entered: 09/06/2023)

 


 

PACER Service Center
Transaction Receipt
09/18/2023 16:33:36

Rating Action Commentary

Fitch Ratings-New York-10 March 2017:

Fitch Ratings has affirmed Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC’s (Ocwen) U.S. residential mortgage servicer ratings as follows:

–Residential primary servicer rating for Prime product at ‘RPS3-‘, Outlook Stable;
–Residential primary servicer rating for Alt-A product at ‘RPS3-‘; Outlook Stable;
–Residential primary servicer rating for Subprime product at ‘RPS3-‘; Outlook Stable;
–Residential primary servicer rating for HELOC product at ‘RPS3-‘; Outlook Stable;
–Residential primary servicer rating for Closed-end Second Lien product at ‘RPS3-‘; Outlook Stable;
–Residential special servicer rating affirmed at ‘RSS3-‘; Outlook Stable;
–Residential master servicer rating affirmed at ‘RMS3-‘; Outlook Stable.

The servicer ratings and Stable Rating Outlook are based on Ocwen’s continued efforts to work through regulatory settlements, incremental operational improvements for the primary and special servicing operation since Fitch’s prior review, highly integrated technology environment, and concentration of offshore servicing operations for primary and special servicing. The master servicer rating and Stable Outlook also reflect consistent Reg AB and USAP results.

All of the servicer ratings incorporate Ocwen’s financial condition. In June 2016, Fitch affirmed Ocwen’s Long-Term Issuer Default Rating at ‘B-‘/Stable. Additional information regarding Ocwen and Ocwen Financial Corporation is available on Fitch’s website at www.fitchratings.com.

Ocwen signed a settlement with the California Department of Business Oversight (CDBO) in February 2017 resolving allegations surrounding its mortgage servicing practices and allowing the company to acquire new servicing business in the state. Ocwen remains under a consent order with the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) and the National Mortgage Settlement (NMS).

In its 10K report filed with the SEC in February 2017, Ocwen stated that it has accrued $12.5 million for a potential settlement as a result of its negotiations with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) to resolve certain concerns the CFPB has expressed relating to the company’s servicing practices and technology. The CFPB concerns primarily stem from its examination of Ocwen that began in 2014, and could result in a consent order that could entail payment of monetary amounts or injunctive relief, among other consequences.

Ocwen continues to make incremental improvements and enhancements to its primary and special servicing operations. Since the prior review, the company transitioned to a new lock-box vendor, streamlined its investor reporting for PLS deals, updated its servicing transfer processes, and consolidated correspondence management.

Ocwen’s highly integrated systems result in an enhanced technology environment. The company leverages a number of systems from Altisource Portfolio Solutions S.A. (Altisource), including its core servicing system REALServicing, and Equator, a default servicing platform. Since Fitch’s prior review, Ocwen implemented Back In The Black for loss mitigation processing.

Ocwen’s primary and special servicing operation continues its reliance on offshore resources.

Approximately 83% of the residential servicing staff is located offshore, with some servicing functions located almost entirely offshore.

of the global operations are wholly owned and operated by Ocwen.

The most recent Reg AB and USAP reports for the master servicing operation did not contain any instances of material noncompliance. Master servicing has reported no instances of material non-compliance with Reg AB or USAP requirements for the past eight years.

As of Dec. 31, 2016, Ocwen’s primary and special servicing portfolio consisted of 1.36 million loans totaling $203.3 billion, a decrease from 1.6 million loans totaling $245.3 billion as of Dec. 31, 2015

This included more than 972,000 loans totaling $145 billion in non-agency RMBS transactions. Ocwen is currently constrained from acquiring any additional mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) in connection with its consent order with the NYDFS.

Ocwen’s master servicing portfolio consisted of approximately 203,000 loans totaling $24.5 billion as of Dec. 31, 2016, a decrease from over 246,000 loans totaling $30.5 billion as of Dec. 31, 2015.

This included approximately 198,000 loans in 606 PLS transactions.

Fitch rates residential mortgage primary, master, and special servicers on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being the highest rating. Within some of these rating levels, Fitch further differentiates ratings by plus (+) and minus (-) as well as the flat rating. For more information on Fitch’s residential servicer rating program, please see Fitch’s report ‘Rating Criteria for U.S. Residential and Small Balance Commercial Mortgage Servicers’, dated April 23, 2015, which is available on the Fitch Ratings web site at ‘www.fitchratings.com’.

Contact:

Primary Analyst
Thomas Crowe
Senior Director
+1-212-908-0227
Fitch Ratings, Inc.
33 Whitehall Street
New York, NY 10004

Secondary Analyst
Amit Arora
Director
+ 1-212-612-7874

Committee Chairperson
Roelof Slump
Managing Director
+1-212-908-0705

Media Relations: Sandro Scenga, New York, Tel: +1 212-908-0278, Email: sandro.scenga@fitchratings.com.

Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com

Applicable Criteria
Criteria for Rating Loan Servicers (pub. 23 Feb 2017)
Criteria for Rating U.S. and Canadian Residential and Small Balance Commercial Mortgage Servicers (pub. 23 Feb 2017)

Additional Disclosures
Solicitation Status
Endorsement Policy

 

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY’S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM.. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH’S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE AT HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/SITE/REGULATORY. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

Copyright © 2017 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.
For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

PARTICIPATION STATUS
The rated entity (and/or its agents) or, in the case of structured finance, one or more of the transaction parties participated in the rating process except that the following issuer(s), if any, did not participate in the rating process, or provide additional information, beyond the issuer’s available public disclosure.
Solicitation Status
The ratings above were solicited and assigned or maintained at the request of the rated entity/issuer or a related third party. Any exceptions follow below.
ENDORSEMENT POLICY
Fitch’s approach to ratings endorsement so that ratings produced outside the EU may be used by regulated entities within the EU for regulatory purposes, pursuant to the terms of the EU Regulation with respect to credit rating agencies, can be found on the EU Regulatory Disclosures page. The endorsement status of all International ratings is provided within the entity summary page for each rated entity and in the transaction detail pages for all structured finance transactions on the Fitch website. These disclosures are updated on a daily basis.
Real Estate and Homebuilding
Structured Finance: CMBS
CMBS Seller/Servicers
Structured Finance
Structured Finance: Servicers
RMBS Seller/Servicers
Structured Finance: RMBS
North America
United States

202325126 –

ROSAS, JUAN vs. PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION (D/B/A NEWREZ)

(Court 133)

SEP 5, 2023 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: SEP 5, 2023

Deutsche Bank Sells $1.5 Million Homestead Property at 70 Percent Discount to Texas Lenders

The custom home builder and mortgage lender then flipped it to a mortgage broker and his wife to make their homestead for only $760k.

Laham Investments LLC’s Wissal Laham and Christina Griffin Snap Removed by ONITY (PHH)

The lawsuit filed in Harris County District Court pro se with a purported $600,000 sales contract to Wissal Laham.

Sharon Davis, aka Bladen, aka Svetlana Pestova, aka Pestova Holdings LLC TRO Stops ONITY Foreclosure

LIT Investigates:11615 SAGEHOLLOW LN HOUSTON TX 77089-4732 is subject to a purported sales contract with Svetlana Pestova.

Florence Banks Left Floundering After Foreclosure Defense Lawyer Bails on Injunction Hearing

Florence Banks sues PHH Mortgage Corporation to stop foreclosure auction, but her attorney doesn’t attend the scheduled injunction hearing.

Eva Morales Sued by DBNTCO and Endures Bottom Feeder Foreclosure Mill Legal Shenanigans

LIT let this latest case percolate in the draft section and what happened on May 2, 2024 was expected, the case would be nonsuited by DBNTCO.

Priority Mail: USPS Consistently Loses Time Sensitive Federal Court Filings for Weeks, Not Days

The excessive delays are when legal mailings are sent from Kingwood to the federal court mailing address in Houston, Texas from Joanna Burke.

Foreclosure Mill Lawyers Gamesmanship Evident in Deutsche Bank Lawsuits Before Judge Al Bennett

We’re ON IT with ONITY.LOAN and LawsinTexas.com as we investigate the Greatest Theft Scheme invoked to steal homeowners properties in Texas.

Operation Elder Abuse: PHH Mortgage Corporation and Deutsche Bank Judge Shopping Continues

Forum Shopping aka Judge Shopping is a disease in Texas courts says Congress, demanding this form of case assignment be outlawed.

The Dorman Phenomenon: LIT’s Founder as Intervenor Seeks to Replace AWOL Plaintiff

Dorman’s case is a matter of public concern and the troubling facts in this case are being investigated by LIT directly, and now legally.

Rosas v. PHH Mortgage Corporation and AltaSource Offshore Customer Service
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To Top