Texas supreme court remanded to the 13th COA, to consider Cantus remaining issues. Justice Gina Benavides for the Court affirmed disbarment.
Lying lawyers are most likely to deceive clients in trying to get business, keeping business and making money from business.
Where were the lawyers? Busy being protected by the judiciary and government.
Magistrate Judge Harjani did not take into account the Hot Potato Doctrine which does not protect the Goodwin Procter lawyers violations.
VOL. 2: ETHICS AND JUDICIAL CONDUCT; Ch. 3: Rules for Judicial-Conduct and Judicial-Disability Proceedings
Congress legislated that attorneys not only have the right but the duty to blow the whistle on corporate fraud but the judiciary...
DC Ethics Opinion 256: We see no ethical violation if the receiving lawyer retains the documents and uses the disclosed information.
It is abundantly clear the Burkes are well within their legal rights to cite the documents and web links which they included...
The attorney-client privilege is narrowly construed and protects disclosures necessary to obtain informed legal advice. Threats of violence do not count.
A ruling on a motion, whether entered by a single judge or a panel, is not binding upon the panel to which...
BODA has just repealed Tex. Disciplinary Rules of Prof'l Conduct R. 8.03 (a) and overturned Texas Supreme Courts own precedent in Comm'n...
Wretchedly, that makes Judge Liz Branch another impartial and bias judge. There is no way it can be interpreted in any other...
This complaint is against an attorney registered with the Florida State Bar. The lawyers’ name is Catalina Azuero and she works for...
The sanctions are minimal, considering the lengthy history of abuses in Texas courts by BDF Hopkins, a foreclosure mill law firm with...
Statutory causes of actions can be enforced by citizens. The legislature holds the keys to the courthouse door that cannot be boarded...
It is obvious the Burkes intend to file a second motion to disqualify Judge Pryor based the on new facts raised (sealing...
Burke v Ocwen and CFPB, that's right, the consumer watchdog objects to the consumers.