One cannot allow one federal court in the State of Texas to allow pro se to file electronically and another deny all...
Defendant seeks a judgment for foreclosure together with an order of sale issued to the Cameron County sheriff or constable.
The “good cause” requisite to recall the mandate is the showing of need to avoid injustice.
And Chief Judge, Orlando Garcia grants the foreclosure mill their wish, stripping any equity left in the home for the heirs of...
Deutsche Bank filed voluntary dismissal of case due to a foreclosure hold placed in the loan instituted by the FEMA and HUD....
ABOVE THE LAW: Private citizens who are brutalized by rogue federal officers (OF THE COURTS) can find little solace ... DUE TO...
Even under a traditional res judicata approach, Marra appropriately considered the terms of the Consent Judgment. CFPB’s claims are barred.
Judge Marra's analysis of the res judicata effect of the Consent Judgment using traditional principles shows that method is inappropriate.
A clear failure by the trial court to analyze or apply the law correctly will constitute an abuse of discretion.
The Americans for Prosperity Foundation, a "nonprofit" founded by Charles Koch Group spent over $1 million in support of her confirmation.
As long as the people accept this appalling type of behavior by federal judges and their staff, courts will continue to trample...
Lewis's mother threatened a Texas judge where she admitted to knowing where the Judge kept his gun. She was a housekeeper at...
Judiciary leaders are expressing deep concern that Congress has failed to provide funding to protect federal judges. LIT says don't fund 'em.
If you are a pro se litigant in federal court, you will have a lot of homework. One of your first is...
"...an appellate court will mandate reassignment when the facts “might reasonably cause an objective observer to question the original judge’s impartiality.”"
Judge Priscilla R. Owen shunts the blame onto 66 year old Circuit Executive Theodore "Ted" Cominos for the ClerkGate Corruption Scandal.
Fifth Cir. hold that a reasonable man would reasonably question this trial judge’s impartiality and the integrity of the judicial system.
A communication divulged to “strangers” or outsiders can scarcely be considered a confidential communication between attorney and client.