By
Posted on
202223850B –
ASSOCIATED ENERGY GROUP LLC vs. U S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
MAY 8, 2023 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: MAY 19, 2023
JUN 2, AUG 18, DEC 22, 2023
Above is the date LIT Last updated this article.
(Account frozen with $1,165.73)
Application for Post Judgment Writ of Garnishment
| Case (Cause) Number | Style | File Date | Court | Case Region | Type Of Action / Offense | |
| 202252190- 7 Ready Docket |
MAPLE RESIDENTIAL LTD vs. LUGO, TRICIA | 8/22/2022 | 113 | Civil | OTHER CIVIL | |
| 201975518- 7 Disposed (Final) |
PEREZ BELTRAN, MELVIN RAUL vs. GALNAREZ, ALFONSO (DBA GALNAREZ DRYWALL) |
10/14/2019 | 011 | Civil | Other Injury or Damage | |
| 201821421- 7 Disposed (Final) |
AMEGY BANK N A vs. STALLONES, JEFF | 3/29/2018 | 334 | Civil | Debt / Contract – Other | |
| 199255915- 7 CONSL Case Disp |
AMERISTAR SUPPLY CORP vs. ASSOCIATED ENERGY GROUP INC |
12/9/1992 | 011 | Civil | AGREEMENT | |
| 199250774- 7 Disposed (Final) |
AMERISTAR FUELS CORPORATION vs. AECTRA TRADING AND TRANSPORTATION INC | 11/9/1992 | 011 | Civil | INJUNCTION | |
| 198340622- 7 Disposed (Final) |
FIDELITY & CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK vs. BURTS BROTHERS INC |
6/6/1983 | 295 | Civil | DECLARATORY JUDGMENT |
LIT’s Fishin’ for answers from Texas… pic.twitter.com/7olk6BWipS
— lawsinusa (@lawsinusa) May 19, 2023
202223850 –
ASSOCIATED ENERGY GROUP LLC vs. GOLDEN STATE JET LLC
MAY 1, 2023 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: MAY 4, 2023
JAN 30, 2023
No answer, Default Judgment signed
Auto Mogul Ashworth Barnes Faces Billion Dollar Debt Recall as Bandit Bob Takes Frosty’s 713 Call
Houston’s Auto Tycoon Ashworth Barnes on a Collision Course as Frost Bank’s $1B+ Debt Recall Hits, with Bob Kruckemeyer Answering the 713 Call
Texas Supreme Court: Don’t Take a Man at His Word as Verbal Agreements are Worthless
Fraud by non-disclosure arises only when the defendant, among other things, has a legal duty to disclose facts to the plaintiff.
Associated Energy Group (AEG) Fifth Attempt at Obtaining Injunctive Relief is Denied in Federal Court
Based upon the record presented, the Court finds AEG has not presented preponderant evidence showing it is likely to succeed on the merits.
