202281248
MIDFIRST BANK vs. HEALTHSOURCE HOME CARE, INCORPORATED
DEC. 15, 2022 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: DEC 15, 2022
APR 19, OCT 9, 2023
Default Percolates until at least May 22…
The petition alleges false income declared, that’s a criminal offense….but that doesn’t warrant unlawful sealing of documents.
| DEFAULT JUDGMENT SIGNED | 05/22/2023 | |
| DEFENDANT COSTS | 05/22/2023 | |
| ORDER SIGNED AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES |
Feb. 10, FEB 26, MAR 28, 2023
No movement, no answer. Default territory now.
Citation Return re: Uraiwan Pinwatana Tesfaye
Citation Corporate re: Healthsource Home Care Incorporated
The Unlawful Restricting of Documents Continues in Harris County District Court https://t.co/5tPoffyO3T
— lawsinusa (@lawsinusa) February 10, 2023
Rule 76a also requires that a motion to seal court records “shall be decided by written order,” and the sealing order shall state “the specific reasons for finding and concluding whether the showing required by paragraph 1, has been made.” Id. R. 76a(6)
| Case (Cause) Number | Style | File Date | Court | Case Region | Type Of Action / Offense | |
| 202111226- 7 Disposed (Final) |
TRAINA-DORGE, JENNIFER vs. TESFAYE, T. JONATHAN | 2/26/2021 | 312 | Family | Divorce No Children | |
| 201857660- 7 Disposed (Final) |
ADVENT STAFFING & HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLC vs. HEALTHSOURCE HOME CARE INCORPORATED |
8/27/2018 | 190 | Civil | Debt / Contract – Debt / Contract | |
| 201825574- 7 Disposed (Final) |
KHREIBANI, IBRAHIM (DR) vs. TESFAYE, TEKLE | 4/16/2018 | 011 | Civil | Debt / Contract – Debt / Contract | |
| 200133050- 7 Disposed (Final) |
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT vs. TESFAYE, TEKLE |
6/29/2001 | 157 | Civil | Tax Delinquency | |
| 200009098- 7 Disposed (Final) |
CAPITAL BANK vs. TESFAYE, TEKLE | 2/21/2000 | 129 | Civil | NOTE | |
| 199721705- 7 Disposed (Final) |
TESFAYE, ISAAC vs. TESFAYE, TECKLE |
4/24/1997 | 129 | Civil | BREACH OF CONTRACT | |
| 199713013- 7 Disposed (Final) |
TESFAYE, ISAAC vs. TESFAYE, TSION | 3/10/1997 | 308 | Family | DIVORCE | |
| 199351223- 7 Disposed (Final) |
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT vs. TESFAYE, TEKLE |
10/4/1993 | 125 | Civil | Tax Delinquency | |
| 199338724- 7 Disposed (Final) |
CYPRESS-FAIRBANKS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIS vs. TESFAYE, TEKLE | 7/26/1993 | 113 | Civil | Tax Delinquency | |
| 198563866- 7 Disposed (Final) |
TESFAYE, KEBELEGNE vs. TESFAYE, TAMMY D |
11/22/1985 | 245 | Family | DIVORCE | |
| 198471056- 7 Purged |
MORALES, FERNANDO vs. TESFAYE, TEKLE | 11/30/1984 | 295 | Civil | PERSONAL INJURY – AUTO | |
| 198157671- 7 Disposed (Final) |
TESFAYE, KATHLEEN R vs. TESFAYE, TEKLE |
11/25/1981 | 245 | Family | DIVORCE |
No Reply from the Lawyer [Christina Vitale] or Law Firm [Jackson Walker] Who Filed the Exhibits
Email Sent: Dec 16, 2022 | Published on LIT: Dec. 21, 2022
Howdy,
LIT released the following article and wondered if you have any comment as to the “restricted” documents you filed into the case?
“Harris County District Court Records “Restricted” aka Sealed in Violation of Texas Rules” https://lawsintexas.com/pr/293
This allows for a non-lawyer driven blog to receive comment and/or correction on any misunderstanding in relation to the same from a Texas lawyer and/or Texas law firm.
Y’all have a great day.
Nowhere could LIT find “Restricted” in the Rules or any Texas Statute
It’s either sealed (after Rule 76 followed) or redacted. Restricting access is equivalent to sealing and this case clearly violates the rule.
Tex. R. Civ. P. 21c as amended through September 23, 2022
Rule 21c – Privacy Protection for Filed Documents
(a) Sensitive Data Defined.
Sensitive data consists of:(1) a driver’s license number, passport number, social security number, tax identification number, or similar government-issued personal identification number;
(2) a bank account number, credit card number, or other financial account number; and
(3) a birth date, a home address, and the name of any person who was a minor when the underlying suit was filed.
(b) Filing of Documents Containing Sensitive Data Prohibited.
Unless the inclusion of sensitive data is specifically required by a statute, court rule, or administrative regulation, an electronic or paper document, except for wills and documents filed under seal, containing sensitive data may not be filed with a court unless the sensitive data is redacted.
(c) Redaction of Sensitive Data; Retention Requirement.
Sensitive data must be redacted by using the letter “X” in place of each omitted digit or character or by removing the sensitive data in a manner indicating that the data has been redacted.
The filing party must retain an unredacted version of the filed document during the pendency of the case and any related appellate proceedings filed within six months of the date the judgment is signed.
(d) Notice to Clerk. If a document must contain sensitive data, the filing party must notify the clerk by:
(1) designating the document as containing sensitive data when the document is electronically filed;
or
(2) if the document is not electronically filed, by including, on the upper left- hand side of the first page, the phrase:
“NOTICE: THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS SENSITIVE DATA.”
(e) Non-Conforming Documents.
The clerk may not refuse to file a document that contains sensitive data in violation of this rule. But the clerk may identify the error to be corrected and state a deadline for the party to resubmit a redacted, substitute document.
(f) Restriction on Remote Access.
Documents that contain sensitive data in violation of this rule must not be posted on the Internet.
Tex. R. Civ. P. 21c
Comment to 2013 Change:
Rule 21c is added to provide privacy protection for documents filed in civil cases.
The Exhibits in a Similar Debt Collection (Commercial) Case Were Not “Restricted”
See; 202242995 – AMERIS BANK AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO FIDELITY BAN vs. RANDLE, LUCIOUS (JR) (M D) (P A) (Court 165)
UPDATED:
Dr. Lucious Randle, Kafi Inc and Badgerin’ Debt Collectin’ Lawyers Acting Like Real Scumbags https://t.co/CcwiyuxEkW— lawsinusa (@lawsinusa) December 15, 2022
LIT’s Founder Refused Electronic Filing in Judge Sim Lake’s Court, But Granted to IFP Siren Lewis
Furthermore, the court ordered a venue transfer from Northern District of Ohio over dismissal, contrary to District of Minnesota recent acts.
Deutsche Bank Sells $1.5 Million Homestead Property at 70 Percent Discount to Texas Lenders
The custom home builder and mortgage lender then flipped it to a mortgage broker and his wife to make their homestead for only $760k.
Epiphany Strikes Gold within Texas Courts by Invoking a Fraudulent Application of the Starker Exchange
The Stark Reality: This latest fraudulent conveyance real estate scam is now endorsed by both the district and appellate courts in Texas.
