SEC Wins Judgment Against Georgia Individual Who Defrauded Investors in Real Estate Investment Scams
Litigation Release No. 25300 / January 6, 2022
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Russell Craig and OneStep Financial Services, LLC, No. 1:18-cv-04539 (N.D. Ga. filed September 28, 2018)
REPUBLISHED BY LIT: JAN 9, 2022
On November 8, 2021, a federal court entered a final judgment against Russell Craig of Union City, Georgia, and his company, OneStep Financial Services, LLC, for orchestrating real estate investment schemes that defrauded investors out of over $1.3 million.
According to the SEC’s complaint filed on September 28, 2018, from 2014 through 2017, Craig convinced at least six investors to invest over $1.3 million in two separate real estate investment schemes by promising high returns and misrepresenting that investor funds would be used for real estate investment projects or, for one investor, that funds would remain in escrow and used only to obtain a “proof of funds” to purchase a condominium property.
Despite these promises, Craig almost immediately misappropriated investor funds, including by transferring funds to bank accounts that Craig controlled.
The SEC’s complaint charged Craig and OneStep with violations of the antifraud provisions of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.
Judge Leigh Martin May for the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia entered final judgment against Craig and OneStep, enjoining Craig and OneStep from future violations of the federal securities laws, ordering Craig to pay a civil penalty of $390,094, and ordering Craig and OneStep to pay, jointly and severally, a total of $545,991 in disgorgement plus $85,184 in prejudgment interest.
The SEC is represented by Melissa Armstrong and M. Graham Loomis.
SEC Charges Atlanta-Based Individual and His Company with Defrauding Investors in Real Estate Investment Scams
Litigation Release No. 24303 / October 3, 2018
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Russell Craig and OneStep Financial Services, LLC, No. 1:18-cv-04539 (N.D. Ga. filed September 28, 2018)
REPUBLISHED BY LIT: JAN 9, 2022
On September 28, 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged Russell Craig and his company, OneStep Financial Services, LLC with violating the anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws by promising investors profits in return for depositing funds into escrow for the purchase or development of real estate properties, and then misappropriating investor funds.
The SEC’s complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, alleges that in one of the schemes, Craig defrauded an investor of more than $900,000 between 2014 and 2016 and misappropriated over $600,000.
Craig misrepresented that the investor’s funds would remain in escrow and be used only for the purpose of obtaining a “proof of funds” to purchase a condominium property known as the Heritage Condominiums in Atlanta, Georgia.
Craig also misrepresented that, after the property was purchased, the investor would receive a return of the principal plus a profit of approximately 30% in a short period of time.
Despite these promises, Craig almost immediately transferred these funds to bank accounts that he controlled or to third parties.
The SEC’s complaint also alleges that Craig encouraged the investor to take out loans to further fund the investment, misrepresenting that Craig would make payments on the loans with his own funds until the real estate transaction closed.
Instead, Craig allegedly used the investor’s escrowed funds to make the payments.
The SEC further alleges that Craig and OneStep engaged in a similar scheme in late 2017.
In this scheme, Craig and OneStep defrauded at least five investors, who were told that their funds were being used for a real estate development project, of $460,000 by guaranteeing high profits and then misappropriating the funds for other purposes.
The SEC’s complaint charges Craig and OneStep with violations of the antifraud provisions of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.
The SEC’s complaint seeks a judgment against the defendants providing for permanent injunctions, disgorgement with prejudgment interest, and civil penalties.
The complaint also names Peter Baker, Elizabeth Oharriz, Prestige Global Trading, Ltd., and Diversified Initiatives Consulting & Logistics, Inc. as relief defendants, seeking disgorgement with prejudgment interest against them.
The SEC’s investigation is led by Christina McGill and Matthew B. Reisig, with assistance from Richard G. Lill, and is supervised by Timothy England and Melissa Hodgman. The litigation will be led by Melissa Armstrong.
Eleventh Circuit: Federal Judge Abused His Powers By Documented Perjury, But He Can Still Preside Over Case
A 3-Panel consisting of familiar Judges Charles Wilson, Kevin Newsom and R Lanier Anderson defies logic and the law in this perverted opinion.
Redlining: Goodwin Law Bankin’ On Corrupt Federal Judge(s) and They’ve Been Blessed in Illinois
AG Merrick Garland announced he would stop redlining. LIT told him the first case should be this one in Illinois. Here’s what happened next.
Attorney General Merrick Garland and Redlining Pits Wall St Banks and BigLaw Against the DOJ
Cooked Up: Goodwin Procter suborned perjury from the confidential witnesses by obtaining false declarations under penalty of perjury
