Appellate Judges

Federal Court Pilot Scheme for Discovery in Foreclosure Cases Confirms It’s A Division of Wall St.

The discovery protocols are biased in favor of the bank or non-bank and the gag order is in violation of the first amendment.

LIT UPDATE (see docket in published article herein)

Jan 11, 2022:

A lot of conferring and meetings about more conferring but no substantive issues addressed. That’s the new pilot scheme’s calendar…

Lewis v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company

(4:21-cv-02348)

District Court, S.D. Texas

JUN 20, 2021 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: SEP 20, 2021

INITIAL DISCOVERY PROTOCOLS FOR RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE CASES

PART 1: INTRODUCTION

In cases involving claims relating to residential mortgage loan defaults or foreclosures, this court requires the parties to use these Initial Discovery Protocols. The purpose of these Initial Discovery Protocols is to require the exchange of the most relevant information and documents early in the case, to assist in framing the issues to be resolved and to plan for more efficient and targeted discovery.

These Initial Discovery Protocols supersede the parties’ obligations to make initial disclosures under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1), but do not preclude a party from seeking additional discovery under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

These Initial Discovery Protocols apply only if a Borrower is a party to the case.

Texas Supreme Court Ruling Reinforces Jurisdiction is Always First

A claim for fees and sanctions under the TCPA can prevent an appeal from becoming moot, but only if a court has subject-matter jurisdiction.

Texas Rustlers: Corralling Calculated Legal Bandits and Villainous Practices by Courtroom Outlaws

Behind Closed Doors: The Coordinated Efforts of Legal Bandits and Complicit Courts to Deprive Homeowners of Their Rights and Property.

A Wild West Blunder: PHH’s Hired Bounty Hunters at Hopkins Law Deliver a Cockamamie Response

Gunsmoke and Legal Misfires: PHH’s Reply Misses the Mark. Hopkins Law’s Cockamamie Response Turns Legal Logic into High Noon Nonsense.

U.S. District Court
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS (Houston)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 4:21-cv-02348

Create an Alert for This Case on RECAP

Lewis v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Assigned to: Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal

Case in other court:  215th JDC of Harris County, 21-40221

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Date Filed: 07/20/2021
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 290 Real Property: Other
Jurisdiction: Diversity

 

Date Filed # Docket Text
09/03/2021 12 Minute entry for proceedings before the Hon. Lee H. Rosenthal. Initial conference held on September 3, 2021. There will be another hearing on November 5, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. by Zoom, unless the parties notify the court before then that they have settled. Thank you, Appearances: Jennifer Juergens and Brandy Alexander.(Court Reporter: M. Malone), filed.(leddins, 4) (Entered: 09/03/2021)
11/05/2021 13 Minute entry for proceedings before the Hon. Lee H. Rosenthal. Status conference held on November 5, 2021. The court and the parties conferred. A status conference is rescheduled for January 10, 2022, at 10:00 AM by video. A zoom link will be sent separately. Appearances: Brandy Alexander for Pltf. and Jennifer Juergens for Deft.(Court Reporter: G. Dye), filed.(leddins, 4) (Entered: 11/08/2021)
01/10/2022 14 Minute entry for proceedings before the Hon. Lee H. Rosenthal. A status conference was held on January 10, 2022. The court and the parties conferred. A status conference is rescheduled for February 28, 2022, at 9:00 AM by video. A zoom link will be sent separately. Appearances: Brandy Alexander for Pltf. and Jennifer Juergens for Deft.(Court Reporter: N. Forrest), filed.(leddins, 4) (Entered: 01/11/2022)
Federal Court Pilot Scheme for Discovery in Foreclosure Cases Confirms It’s A Division of Wall St.
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To Top