LIT COMMENTARY
Seth Castillo <scastillo@bigstatebuyers.com>
Mon, Mar 6, 5:25 PM (13 days ago)
to justice@lawsintexas.com
Given the extreme nature of your allegations, without any first hand knowledge of, or from the party you are claiming to be at fault in these articles, a phone conversation is a very reasonable thing to ask of you before I take the time to respond to the items you have requested.
Do you have the desire to know the truth? Or am I wasting my time and you are just hoping to have a little more information to misconstrue?.
I am giving you the benefit of the doubt in reaching out, and I am hopeful your intentions are not as malicious as they seem face value. Either way, please let me know and I am more than happy to discuss in a manner that is fair.
—–Original Message—–
From: justice@lawsintexas.com <justice@lawsintexas.com>
Sent: Monday, March 6, 2023 6:03 PM
To: Seth Castillo <scastillo@bigstatebuyers.com>
Subject: RE: Laws In Texas “Article Inquiry”
[You don’t often get email from justice@lawsintexas.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
Not how we work.
You should re-read the reply.
—–Original Message—–
From: Seth Castillo <scastillo@bigstatebuyers.com>
Sent: Monday, March 6, 2023 4:55 PM
To: justice@lawsintexas.com
Subject: RE: Laws In Texas “Article Inquiry”
I am happy to address all three articles. I would like to setup a time to discuss. What is a good number to reach you at?.
Thank you,
—–Original Message—–
From: justice@lawsintexas.com <justice@lawsintexas.com>
Sent: Monday, March 6, 2023 3:10 PM
To: Seth Castillo <scastillo@bigstatebuyers.com>
Subject: RE: Laws In Texas “Article Inquiry”
[You don’t often get email from justice@lawsintexas.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
Howdy,
If you wish to submit your documents and written arguments contesting LIT’s article, we’ll gladly review.
We would request you address the other two articles on LIT pertaining to your company at the same time.
Another Off Market LLC, DBA Big State Home Buyers Unconscionable Ten Dollar Contract
e.g why substituted service has not been executed since Jan 5, when the court granted your request by Order.
e.g. why you non-suited.
++++
From: Seth Castillo <scastillo@bigstatebuyers.com>
Subject: Article Inquiry
Message Body:
Hello,
I am reaching out in regard to this article (see link below). I can certainly appreciate an effort to keep companies honest, as I can imagine there are some cases out there where the seller was in fact in the right. While that is not the case here, I would be happy to have a conversation and share the full facts of this transaction with you so you can make your own determinations. Please reach out to the email provided and I’ll follow up with you directly.
Thank you, and I look forward to hearing from you.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/lawsintexas.com/texas-real-estate-scams-off-market-llc-dba-big-state-home-buyers-unconscionable-ten-dollar-contract/%3famp
—
This e-mail was sent from a contact form on Laws In Texas (https://lawsintexas.com)
202271949
OFF MARKET LLC DBA BIG STATE HOME BUYERS vs. BROWN, LAURICE C.
NOV 2, 2022 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: NOV 2, 2022
The TREC Contract was Signed on Oct. 22, 2022
The home is valued at $243k and the buyer offered $160k, that’s $83G’s equity (before closing costs). Quite the return on your investment. Yet for this low-ball offer, the cash tendered to consummate the contract is a pittance, $1,100.
The seller didn’t wait to reject the offer, clearly she has let the buyers know and been transparent about the fact she’s changed her mind. After all, suit has been filed within 10 days of the contract.
Whether it’s because she obtained a better financial offer is of no relevance here, the only question which is not answered in the petition is did she cancel within “3 days” allowed under law?
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR NON-SUIT WITHOUT PREJUDICE
COMES NOW, Plaintiff Off Market, L.L.C., a Texas limited liability company, d/b/a Big State Home Buyers [“Plaintiff”] and files this Motion for Non-Suit Without Prejudice and would respectfully show the Court as follows:
Plaintiff no longer wishes to pursue this claim at the present time.
Respectfully submitted,
The Law Offices of Aaron D. Bieber, PLLC
2245 Texas Drive, Suite 300
Sugar Land, TX 77479 Tel: (281) 566-2534
By: /s/ James F. McMartin IV
James F. McMartin IV, of counsel
State Bar No. 24065727
E-Mail: james.mcmartin4@gmail.com
By:/s/ Aaron Bieber
Aaron D. Bieber
State Bar No. 24093969
E-Mail: aaron@aaronbieberlaw.com
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
No movement since filing.
No movement since filing.
No movement since filing.
The Real Scumbag Series: Investigating Nanik Bhagia’s 10-Year Connection to 5709 Langley
Questionable Oversight: PHH Mortgage’s Disinterest in 5709 Langley Houston, TX 77016 Amid Foreclosure Concerns
LIT’s Real Scumbag Series: The Bandit Shack and The Lucious Doc File Lawsuit Again
The first lawsuit was dismissed for want of prosecution on Dec. 30, 2022. Now they decide its worth refiling again.
A Real Scumbag Lawyer in Michigan Scams a $300k+ Home for $2,000 from 81 Yr Old Widow
LIT’s Title Deed Fraud Series reaches beyond Texas for this story of a lawyer scamming a recently widowed old woman. It’s Elder Abuse.
