Debt Collector

Cronenwett and Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Stubblefield, S.D. Tex.

Defendant Mark Stubblefield appeared pro se at the court hearing, but no subsequent answer to Deutsche Bank’s Complaint has been filed.

Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Stubblefield

(4:20-cv-02577)
District Court, S.D. Texas

JUL 22, 2020 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: AUG 15, 2021

10 Apr 2022 Update: Summary Judgment Granted by Judge Hanks, (31 Mar 2022) allowing foreclosure, case closed.

15 Jan. 2022 Update: Pretrial conference was scheduled for Friday, 14 Jan at 3pm. We’re waiting to see if an order follows and who attended.

5 Jan. 2022 Update: Judge Hanks has approved second request by DB foreclosure mill Mackie Wolf to extend docket call until May 13, 2022 ….

31 Oct. 2021 Update: Judge Hanks has approved request by DB foreclosure mill Mackie Wolf to extend pre-trial conference until 14 Jan 2022 ….

Combined Docs; Motion for Summary Judgment by Deutsche Bank, Order re Zoom Conf. due to Pandemic, Executed Summons and Summons Request.

Texas Law Professors on Bankruptcy and Civil Rights Won’t Confront Premeditated Judicial Misconduct

Three lauded Texas University law schools employ these academics. Despite their resumes centered on civil rights, they refuse to defend them.

Second Quick-Fire Ruling by Federal Magistrate Judge Challenges Integrity of Her Own Scheduling Order

Uneven Treatment: Judge Allows Longer Response Time for Opposing Party and their Counsel Despite Previous Restrictions on Pro Se Plaintiff.

TRO Cash Bond Amounts in Harris County District Court: A New Era Begins

LIT’s Continuous Monitoring Uncovers the Fall of the TRO $100 Cash Bond Which Will No Longer be Universally Adopted.

Cronenwett and Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Stubblefield, S.D. Tex.
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To Top