In this foreclosure appeal, the court sua sponte includes arguments of res judicata not brought up at the lower court and returns...
Austin Attorney Mark Hopkins arrives in Judge Erza's court of Counsel for Codilis in this local foreclosure in W.D. Tex. federal court.
John Coleman joined the CFPB just after its inception and had his hand in almost every case the agency tried. Now he's...
LIT has witnessed a decade of foreclosures. The motto on the highest court's building - Equal Justice for All - has become...
Obviously, the clerk in charge of this opinion wasn't very good at arithmetic at school and left it undisturbed from the lower...
Chase’s 2013 proposed repayment plan and its 2014 request for less than the full amount owed is an intent to abandon its...
When Tommy Bastian is included as a party by a homeowner, the judges rally around like the US Marshals to protect their...
Senior Judge David Erza in Austin, W.D. Tex. issued his order of summary judgment in favor of Lakeview 4 days after attorney...
The Chief Judge is Janet DiFiore and she is a client of Greenberg Traurig, who represented two lenders on appeals she reversed...
Illinois: The “single-refiling rule,” which prohibits actions that have been voluntarily dismissed from being refiled more than once.
Here, the Fifth Circuit is, in effect, reaching the merits to issue remand instructions. Perhaps that is what is meant by 'gamesmanship'.
There is NO AFFIDAVIT on the docket at the N.D. Tex. district court which qualifies as PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE of service in...
The Panel does not mention the fact that Judges HIgginbotham and Stewart were on the panel for the 2017 appeal against Wells...
If you notice, all the arguments re acceleration are based on post 2008 financial crisis opinions by the corrupt Fifth Circuit judges.
The scope of judicial immunity in the Eleventh Circuit is now made clear. Judicial immunity is complete, unqualified, and without exception.
Kim Naimoli v Ocwen Loan Servicing, now PHH Mortgage Corporation receives response from CFPB at request of Second Circuit Panel on Appeal.
Ocwens' Consent Judgment had two sets of obligations: complying with federal and state law, and complying with the fencing-in provisions.
Even under a traditional res judicata approach, Marra appropriately considered the terms of the Consent Judgment. CFPB’s claims are barred.