Chief Judge Lee Rosenthal denied label of 'Vexatious Litigant' with at least 9 foreclosure filings spanning 18 years, including 6 since 2017.
If you are facing foreclosure in Texas Federal Court, there's a lot of legalese to learn. But will you receive access to...
The Court finds that it should award Plaintiffs $1,000.00 in statutory damages, $9,000 in punitive damages, attorney fees and expenses.
Engagement of Attorneys allowed Plaintiffs to submit a feasible plan, disburse a total of $105, 877.52 to creditors and receive a discharge.
Mr. Cooper violated Massachusetts Law by engaging in deceptive debt collection practices on a debt previously discharged in bankruptcy.
Goodwin have avoided all the main arguments raised by the pro se Burkes because they have no legal answer, so instead they...
Initial Conference set for 2/16/2022 at 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison. That's 154 days - Conferences are set for...
Who's ready to take over the corrupt gavel of Senior Judge David Hittner? Well it's apparently Judge Alfred Homer Bennett, S.D. Tex.,...
Judge Higginson (9) leads, followed closely by Judges Stewart (8) Southwick (7) Smith, King, Jolly and Costa (6) on foreclosure appeal panels
Pro se Harriet Nicholson's Drop Mic Moment in Texas Federal Court.
LIT suggests a Class Action is necessary to prevent further Injustices and theft of property belonging to hard-working Citizens of America.
LIT has previously highlighted this attorney and law firm. Now they are going bold and stepping up the challenge to PHH Predatory...
John Coleman joined the CFPB just after its inception and had his hand in almost every case the agency tried. Now he's...
The scope of judicial immunity in the Eleventh Circuit is now made clear. Judicial immunity is complete, unqualified, and without exception.
Kim Naimoli v Ocwen Loan Servicing, now PHH Mortgage Corporation receives response from CFPB at request of Second Circuit Panel on Appeal.
Ocwens' Consent Judgment had two sets of obligations: complying with federal and state law, and complying with the fencing-in provisions.
Even under a traditional res judicata approach, Marra appropriately considered the terms of the Consent Judgment. CFPB’s claims are barred.
Judge Marra's analysis of the res judicata effect of the Consent Judgment using traditional principles shows that method is inappropriate.