With so many cases percolatin' with so many judges, the departing (retiring) judge Vanessa Gilmore put herself forward to deal with Kafi.
After allowing the lawyers to arbitrate without court oversight, Judge Eskridge pings out an order that stirs the parties into action.
Deutsche Bank filed voluntary dismissal of case due to a foreclosure hold placed in the loan instituted by the FEMA and HUD....
One can't help but notice that Snr Judge Hoyt obtains foreclosure complaints 'of color' despite the random 'blind draw' assignment system.
PHH is authorized to bring this litigation as the Insured and/or the Servicer, on behalf of the owners and/or investors, under the...
Incredibly, Altisource for Deutsche Bank contacted Pepco Electric and had the power company change the account into the name of Altisource.
Justice Barrett is originally from Louisiana and while sitting on the Seventh Circuit was keen to cite to published 5th Cir. Precedent...
Deutsche Bank AG is accused of turning a blind eye to a massive Ponzi scheme that involved fraudulent real estate investments in...
LIT has witnessed a decade of foreclosures. The motto on the highest court's building - Equal Justice for All - has become...
Chase’s 2013 proposed repayment plan and its 2014 request for less than the full amount owed is an intent to abandon its...
The Chief Judge is Janet DiFiore and she is a client of Greenberg Traurig, who represented two lenders on appeals she reversed...
Illinois: The “single-refiling rule,” which prohibits actions that have been voluntarily dismissed from being refiled more than once.
If you notice, all the arguments re acceleration are based on post 2008 financial crisis opinions by the corrupt Fifth Circuit judges.
The scope of judicial immunity in the Eleventh Circuit is now made clear. Judicial immunity is complete, unqualified, and without exception.
Kim Naimoli v Ocwen Loan Servicing, now PHH Mortgage Corporation receives response from CFPB at request of Second Circuit Panel on Appeal.
Ocwens' Consent Judgment had two sets of obligations: complying with federal and state law, and complying with the fencing-in provisions.
Even under a traditional res judicata approach, Marra appropriately considered the terms of the Consent Judgment. CFPB’s claims are barred.
Judge Marra's analysis of the res judicata effect of the Consent Judgment using traditional principles shows that method is inappropriate.