CoreLogic Provides MLS and Real Estate Data and Analytics. What the Report fails to tell you is that after evicting millions of families from their Homes, Real Estate Investors like Steve Mnuchin, Joseph Otting, Mick Mulvaney and Wilbur Ross who are Cabinet Members in Donald Trumps’ Government couldn’t rent the residential homes as they had destroyed citizens credit ratings and so now they are ‘remarketing’ to “small investors” to try and dump residential stocks that are not moving.
Home purchasing activity[i] among investors is on the rise. In 2018, the share of home sales bought by investors reached its highest level in two decades. However, this increase isn’t from big institutional buyers, but rather from smaller investors just getting into the game. What’s more, these investors appear to be focusing in the starter-home tier, giving first-time homebuyers a run for their money while also chasing homes in markets with relatively high rents.
In this CoreLogic special report, we take a deep dive into investor homebuying activity. Not only do we investigate investor homebuying nationally, we also identify investor activity by home price tier. Additionally, we examine why investors are more active in some markets than others, and if increasing investor activity tightens market conditions.
Investor Activity in the U.S. Housing Market Reaches Record Highs
By the end of 2018, the investment rate in the U.S. housing market reached 11.3% – the highest rate since CoreLogic started tracking these data in 1999. The investment purchase rate in 2017 was the second highest on record at 11%, which was above the investor buying fury of 2012 – 2014 when purchase rates reached 10.3% – 10.9%.
Smaller investors are responsible for increasing investor homebuying activity. This is in sharp contrast to the rise in large institutional investors in the years following the recession. When looking at investor activity based on the total number of properties purchased over our study period, we found small investors – those who purchased 10 homes or less between 1999 and 2018 – have increased their share of homebuying more than large- and medium-sized investors. These so-called “mom-and-pop” investors grew from 48% of all investor-purchased homes in 2013 to more than 60% in 2018. Large investors – those who purchased more than 101 homes – nearly doubled their activity between 2000 and 2013 but have pulled back since the foreclosure crisis and now sit at 15.8% of purchases. Medium-sized investors – those who purchased between 11 and 100 homes – have also seen their share steadily fall, from a peak of 30% in 2010 to 22.7% in 2018.
We also found investor purchase rates were much higher among starter-homes. The share of starter homes purchased by investors peaked at over one-in-five homes over the past two years, with a rate of 20.3% in both 2017 and 2018. These rates are 2-3 times the investor purchasing rates of move-up (middle tier) and high-end (upper tier) homes that also peaked in 2018 at 7.8% and 6.3%, respectively.
Investor Activity Highest in Eastern Half of the U.S., Lowest in West
We also found investor homebuying rates vary sharply across the country, with the highest rates east of the Mississippi River and the lowest rates to its west. Each of the top 10 metros with the highest investor purchase rates is in the eastern half of the country, with Detroit, Philadelphia and Memphis, Tennessee leading the pack at 27%, 23.3%, and 19.7%, respectively. Just two of the top 10 are western markets, with Des Moines, Iowa and Oklahoma City, Oklahoma at 18.7% and 17.2%, respectively.
Investor activity tends to be lowest in the West, although two East Coast markets and one Midwest market also had lower levels of activity. The five markets with the least amount of investor activity are all west of the Rockies, including Ventura, California, Boise, Idaho, Oakland, California, San Jose, California and Sacramento, California at 4.8%, 4.8%, 5.1%, 5.2% and 5.3%, respectively. The three non-western markets with lower activity include Elgin, Illinois, Frederick, Maryland and Worcester, Massachusetts at 5.4%, 5.6% and 5.9%, respectively.
No Surprise: Investors Attracted to High-Rent Markets
Why are investors buying homes at high rates in some markets and lower rates in others? While there are several plausible explanations, we found investors are attracted to markets where rents are relatively high compared to purchase prices. The inter-market variation in median cap rates – which is the ratio of annual rent collected on a property compared to its value – is highly correlated with the share of investor activity in a given market. Across our sample of the 100 largest markets between 2012 and 2018, the correlation is quite strong, with a Pearson’s R of 0.55 for you stats nerds out there.
Investors are likely attracted to markets with high-cap rates because cap rates are simply a measure of expected returns. For example, on an initial investment of $100,000, a property with a 10% cap rate will be expected to deliver an annual return of $10,000 in rent, and a property with a 2% cap rate would be expected to deliver $2,000. While there are certainly other considerations for investors, cap rates are simple but powerful indicators of market dynamics because they also capture other market-level opportunities and risks, such as expectations of future home value growth, vacancy rates, tenant risk and physical conditions of properties. All things being equal, investors tend to prefer higher over lower returns, and those in the housing market – especially smaller investors – are no different.
Increase in Investor Activity Associated with Tighter Housing Market Conditions
Additionally, we found larger increases in investor activity from the housing market bottom (2012) to the most recent calendar year (2018) are also strongly correlated with tightening housing market conditions. Across the largest 100 markets, there is a moderate correlation (Pearson’s R of 0.35) between the change in investor activity over these six years and the change in market velocity (the rate of sales divided the number of new listings) over the same period. In other words, markets that witnessed an increase in the share of active investors also experienced a similar increase in how fast homes were selling.
Does this mean investors snapped up supply that would have otherwise been bought by owner-occupiers? Maybe, but the evidence isn’t conclusive because there’s a possible chicken-or-egg relationship between the two. While an uptick in investors into a market perhaps increases competition and lowers supply relative to demand, the opposite is also possible: markets with tightening supply could draw investors as they perceive markets with a dwindling supply to be safer bets than those with more plentiful supply.
The Gist
While we found investor activity is at an all-time high and concentrated in the lower end of the market, we can’t definitively conclude this increase leads to excessive competition for owner-occupiers. This is because it’s also possible investors are filling a void in markets where there is less owner-occupier demand. Maybe not so coincidentally, the places with the most investor activity – like Detroit, Philadelphia and Baltimore – had less demand and slower price growth in the latest economic expansion compared to regions with less investor activity and higher price growth, such as San Jose, Oakland and Ventura. Either way, it’s a truism that homebuyers today are more likely to cross paths with investors during an open house than at any other time in the past two decades.
Readers interested in the full data release can download it here.
[i] We define investors as buyers of homes that use a corporate or non-individual identifier on the deed. This includes LLCs, CORPs, and INCs, to name a few. We have removed identifiers that are likely to be government agencies or banks, as these are likely to be non-arm’s length transactions, including REO acquisitions, repossessions, and/or foreclosures rather than open-market transactions.
DOJ demands CoreLogic hand over MLS data amid antitrust concerns
The multiple listings service vendor was targeted earlier this month
The U.S. Justice Department is demanding multiple listings service vendor CoreLogic hand over data, as scrutiny intensifies over antitrust claims in the sector.
CoreLogic, a financial services and analytics firm, notified clients of the request this week, according to Inman. The company stated that the Justice Department had asked for MLS data relating to buyer broker commissions and its policy language around the appropriate handling of the data. Other vendors have also received similar requests, the outlet reported, citing a blog by 7DS Associates.
The goal of the inquiry was not immediately clear, but it follows a class action lawsuit filed against the National Association of Realtors, accusing it of conspiring with the country’s largest brokerages to determine buyer agents’ compensation. The suit, led by multiple home sellers, named Realogy, HomeServices of America, RE/MAX and Keller Williams as co-defendants.
Earlier this month, CoreLogic was targeted in a lawsuit brought by the Austin Board of Realtors in Texas, which accused the firm of selling home sale data to a local appraisal organization.
US Courts Blame Homeowners for the 2008 Foreclosure Crisis. No Mention of Bank Greed.
This bias article examines foreclosure case activities in U.S. district courts during the Great Recession and the subsequent recovery period.
This Stanford Report Confirms the Obvious in 2020. Foreclosures are Devastating and Destroy Families.
These results are highly relevant in today’s climate Diamond said. There are huge, long-term harms of foreclosure that have not been on policymakers radars.
Over 4 Million Mortgages Past Due Per May 2020 Statistics. Foreclosure Mills Are Smiling. Homeowners are Crying.
There was a total of 4.123 million loans that were 30 days or more past due in May, 723,000 more than in April and 2.36 million more than a year earlier.
