This Stanford Report Confirms the Obvious in 2020. Foreclosures are Devastating and Destroy Families.

These results are highly relevant in today’s climate Diamond said. There are huge, long-term harms of foreclosure that have not been on policymakers radars.

Stanford study finds home foreclosures can have devastating, long-term impacts

Stanford economist Rebecca Diamond compiled a unique dataset to uncover fresh research insights into foreclosure’s effects on homeowners, landlords and renters.

Originally Published: 22 June, 2020

A new study led by Stanford economist Rebecca Diamond sheds new light on what economists know about foreclosure’s impacts amid a brewing housing crisis due to the economic repercussions of COVID-19. (Image credit: Getty Images)

In a new working paper, Stanford economist Rebecca Diamond finds that foreclosures make homeowners less likely to buy another house in subsequent years. Their living arrangements become less secure, and they default on other debts more often.

Diamond and her co-authors – Rose Tan, a Stanford PhD student, and Adam Guren of Boston University – also identify a subset of homeowners who suffer the most: Mortgage holders who are on the margin.

These are the homeowners who are behind on their payments but could likely make good on their loans if given a breakthrough debt restructuring or government support. These marginal homeowners, who exist at all income levels, are far more likely to divorce and relocate to lower-quality neighborhoods as a result of foreclosure.

Diamond’s findings, released as a working paper on June 22 by the National Bureau of Economic Research, shed new light on what economists know about foreclosure’s impacts. They also come amid a brewing housing crisis due to the economic repercussions of COVID-19, with many housing experts predicting a rise in residential foreclosures that could pressure lawmakers to intervene.

“These results are highly relevant in today’s climate,” Diamond said. “There are huge, long-term harms of foreclosure that have not been on policymakers’ radars or, until now, understood from an academic perspective.” Diamond is a senior fellow at the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR) and an associate professor at the Stanford Graduate School of Business.

In her study, Diamond also looked at how foreclosure affects landlords and their tenants. She found that landlords take a monetary hit that is similar to homeowners but avoid the added pain of having to leave their primary residence. For renters, the disruptions are limited. While they are often evicted, that inconvenience tends to be short-lived and they avoid any long-term consequences.

“What’s particularly interesting is that landlords just get the financial shock and renters just get the eviction shock, but homeowners get both shocks and the effects are far more severe,” Diamond said. “It’s the combination of the financial hit and eviction that can devastate homeowners.”

Building on prior research

Media reports often detail the social ramifications of home foreclosures, but in the past, economists and regulators have looked only at the bottom-line costs, according to Diamond.

A 2010 report by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development found that foreclosures during the Great Recession averaged $51,000. About $41,000 of that accounted for bank losses and drops in neighboring home values. Meanwhile, the homeowners going into foreclosure shouldered the other $10,000 worth of the cost.

Previous studies on housing foreclosures have tracked foreclosures by comparing owners whose lenders moved to seize their homes with those who stayed current on their mortgage payments. Credit reports, however, allow only for foreclosure analyses and do not reveal much about longer-term impacts, according to Diamond.

To overcome these drawbacks, Diamond, Tan and Guren built a large dataset around foreclosure filings recorded in Chicago’s Cook County between 2005 and 2016. Illinois requires foreclosures to go through its courts.

Next, Diamond’s team linked other key data sources to the filings, including records on bankruptcy, crime, divorce, individual address histories, credit scores, incomes by zip code, and school test scores.

The researchers then used two methods for analyzing the data. One approach allowed them to measure the average financial and non-financial effects of foreclosure on all homeowners over time. The other enabled them to look at the subset of homeowners, or about 7 percent of all foreclosure cases studied, who were on the cusp of foreclosure versus a debt restructuring. In other words, they didn’t face a severe hardship that would make it impossible for them to make good on their mortgages.

This second approach was especially significant. Because Cook County randomly assigns foreclosure cases to judges, the outcomes for marginal cases vary depending on the judge. This meant Diamond could match and then track homeowners with similar characteristics, but different outcomes based on how lenient or strict their designated judge was.

“That’s as close as we can get to an experiment that is naturally occurring in the data,” she said.

The need for new policy considerations

Marginal homeowners who went through foreclosure, she found, had the most to lose. They typically lived in higher-income neighborhoods and had larger mortgages. They were also twice as likely to be divorced after five years compared with owners whose homes were ultimately not foreclosed on. They tended to relocate to significantly poorer-quality neighborhoods, based on zip code incomes and school test scores.

Diamond found that the differences in neighborhood quality between foreclosed owners and their non-foreclosed peers widened over time. “For marginal homeowners, the negative effects compared to average homeowners were huge,” she said.

Average homeowners and landlords did not escape unscathed. Both experienced significant financial distress in terms of lost assets and delinquent payments on other forms of debt. Foreclosed-upon homeowners of all kinds were not forced to downsize, but they were significantly less likely to own their future home. Landlords, meanwhile, typically stayed in their primary residence but had higher rates of DUI convictions post-foreclosure.

Diamond said her findings suggest the need for a different cost-benefit analysis by policymakers when considering programs for helping underwater homeowners. This includes designing programs with marginal homeowners – and the additional risks they face – in mind.

“As with any government policy, only a share of people who are eligible for a benefit ever try to take it up,” Diamond said. “My guess is that the people who would take up an offer of help would be the most to gain.”

Media Contacts

Adam Gorlick, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research: (650) 724-0614;

Egoist Judge Alan Albright’s Refusal to Transfer IP Cases Infuriates the Federal Circuit

As of late June 2021, Judge Alsup had significantly fewer cases on his docket (157 cases) than did Judge Albright (1053 cases).

Sanctioned Lawyer Crystal Gibson of BDF Provides Bennett With A Reason to Stay the Foreclosure Case

Crystal Gibson of BDF requests the Court stay deadlines, docket call and bench trial pending a ruling on Cenlar’s Motion for Summary Judgment.

Mackie Wolf’s 3rd Abatement in this Foreclosure Case with Judge Hoyt has Expired. Is Summary Judgment Next?

 After lengthy abatement, it looks like this case is about to fire into action. LIT is tracking the case. Bookmark for updates.

Billy Deramus v. Shapiro Schwartz LLP before Judges Bryan and Rosenthal, S.D. Tex.

It took five months for the Chief Judge Lee Rosenthal to write her order denying Billy’s motion to disqualify MJ Bryan. Why?

PHH via McGlinchey Are Bounced From Federal Court by Judge Xavier Rodriguez

PHH’s proposed measure of the amount in controversy—the market value of property—is inapposite based on the claims actually asserted.

LIT Cannot Obtain the Order Re BDF Attorney Fees Dated 24 Sep. 2021 from Pacer And That’s Concerning

So what we have here is the court missed the fact that sanctioned lawyer Gibson did not provide a declaration affidavit for fees.

This Stanford Report Confirms the Obvious in 2020. Foreclosures are Devastating and Destroy Families.
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Laws In Texas is a blog about the Financial Crisis and how the banks and government are colluding against the citizens and homeowners of the State of Texas and relying on a system of #FakeDocs and post-crisis legal precedents, specially created by the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to foreclose on homeowners around this great State. We are not lawyers. We do not offer legal advice. We are citizens of the State of Texas who have spent a decade in the court system in Texas and have been party to during this period to the good, the bad and the very ugly.

Donate to LawsInTexas. Make a Difference.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

We keep your data private and share your data only with third parties that make this service possible. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

© 2020-21 LawInTexas com is an online trading name which is wholly owned by Blogger Inc., a nonprofit 501(c)(3) registered in Delaware. | All Rights Reserved.

To Top