A disgruntled residential property investor gets no sympathy at the Fifth Circuit, keeping Deutsche Bank and Ocwen as the winners in this opinion.
“Plaintiff–Appellant Janos Farkas initiated this action against Defendants–Appellees Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, and Power Default Services, Inc., claiming that foreclosures of his two residential investment properties were barred.
Ocwen and Deutsche Bank filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c).
In ruling on this motion, the district court decided that Farkas will take nothing from all three defendants. We AFFIRM.“
Farkas v Ocwen, Deutsche Bank et al
Before KING, ELROD, and HIGGINSON
Former Bookkeeper for Distressed Real Estate Flippin’ Side-Businesses Fallin’ Out Over Money
The Jet fuel owner and real estate investor, who’s house went up in flames in 2019, claims $121k was finched. Lugo says it was split profits.
Eight Reasons Why You Cannot Trust a Federal Judge to Follow Their Oath nor The Rule of Law
Self-dealing caused Judge Bennett to enter judgment against Plaintiffs and equity will not enforce judgments procured by fraud.
Highlands Residential Mortgage Wants It’s $300K Sign-On Incentive Back from a Top-Producing Loan Officer
Miller represented to Highlands during his employment interviews that he generated approximately $130 million dollars in mortgages in 2020.
Post Edited: The Law of Restitution and Unjust Enrichment Explained https://t.co/8eGfWdoRiV
— LawsInTexas (@lawsintexasusa) December 26, 2020
